Alright, time for pictures. Since most of the primary shape is there, relying on this for fine details wouldn't be prudent, especially when considering that the drawing hasn't been tested critically to ensure that all the details line up. However, there are some things which it points out effectively. Note that the quality on this isn't great, as it was scanned at work...
Again, there is a slight rise to the canopy, and another subtle rise in the rear fuselage. The canopy also arcs out slightly on the center panels, along with the rest of the central hull plating. Again, it's a very subtle curve. The main lines down the side of the nose profile remain straight until the tip of the nose is reached, where a slight curve is permissable.
The cut-outs on the side of the hull are probably over-exaggerated. However, you need to make sure you join the missile launcher/engine pods to the main hull properly - a small cut out is probably the only way to do that.
And yes, I do advocate keeping the canopy framing. Why? The fighter was originally designed with framing, and it looks at home with it. It's an assault fighter, remember, and the frame, however light, keeps that well-armored canopy securely mounted to that well-armored hull. Unlike other Imperial fighers, the AG is a tough cookie.