Originally posted by Zeronet
Im a Republican, i was just stating the facts. Still we could never get rid of them funny as they run that religion.
Also World War 4 would not be fought with sticks and stones, because we have computer power. We can store information in bunkers(which they did/do during the late 20th) etc and store equipment for war.
About Saddamn, the only thing keeping him around is the Muslim states around him and pretty soon its going to turn sour for him, when we start bombing all his complexes. Saddamn is luckily enough so insane, he believes he could win, Saddamn has never had the chance to nuke anyone because theres a big no fly zone which we patrol. Stability in Iraq? Well i dont know what you call stability these days oh yes, he used to bomb and use bio/chem weapons his own people before we set up the no-fly zone, such a "brilliant" leader isnt he?
I really don't know where to begin- whether with the fact that nuclear weapons have a tendency toward catastrophic electromagnetic distortion, which would wipe everything computer-based within a quite large radius, or whether to point out that Saddam isn't really very popular with his neighbors, either, and doesn't think he could win, and has made that fact quite apparent.
And when, exactly, did he use bioweapons on his own people? Part of the problem with saying asnything coherent about Saddam is that in the past few decades literally NO solid infarmation has gotten to the public about him, and what there is is given an obvious, and rather silly, propogandic spin. Perhaps he really is the Antichrist and planning to dominate the world and kill everybody including himself with an incurable anthrax plague, but if that's not true, next to nothing that is ever reported about him is, and considering how he has yet to actually USE any bioweapons, it seems to me to be highly unlikely. In short: You don't know ****, I don't know ****, nobody knows ****, so let's talk about something else.