Against all of the manifestations of drama and hysteria around, I refuse to acknowledge that this situation is anything more then typical, political quarrel which happens all the time.
The infamous thread that's being discussed containted nothing, but pitiful accusations against Goob without anykind of hard evidence. Despite the fact, that he refused to acknowledge support for anykind of "white suprematism", more nonsense accusations emerged. The most concerning thing about it, is the fact that some memebers of moderation crew took part of this, despite the fact, that in such situations their responsibility is to remain impartial and objective.
Do you know what's cool about Axem? I have no bloody idea about his political beliefs. His moderation style is so subtle and impartial, that nobody is ever aggrieved. That's how moderation should work. Too bad that not everybody acknowledge this style of moderation.
Sorry guys, but somebody's support for this or another political option does not mean acceptance or support for everything that this particular political option proclaim. In my life I voted lots of options, from far-right to social-democrat. Sometimes you agree with part of postulates of one option, sometimes you just vote against somebody. I think it's rare kind of privilege to support a political option we completely agree with.
To be fair: I do not support anykind of far-right beliefs, being on the liberal side. I do not support any possible legal threats from Goob against any members of the community, but also I don't support anykind of unfounded accusations against Goob with little to no evidence supporting those accusations.
Goober is supportive admin and welcoming member of the community. I certainly do disagree with him regarding certain topics, but I also disagree with other admins and moderators. It doesn't mean that contradicting beliefs implicate anykind of hate towards anybody. Nothing Goober display renders him unappropiate for his function and none of his personal beliefs renders him violating anykind of law nor rules of the HLP.
There will always be people you disagree with. Exaggerating will not change a thing. I strongly suggest to both sides to reconsider their statements, and rethink if opposing political beliefs are more important, then obvious respect to other human being.