Originally posted by Sandwich
The location of the Al-Aqsa Mosque (and the Dome of the Rock) happens to be the Temple Mount, pretty much the holiest site on earth for Jews and Christians as well as the 3rd holiest site for Muslims, after Mecca and Medina.
Its the
supposed site of the temple mount, its also not part of Israel.
"Hudna", first link in Google: http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/critiques/Hudna_With_Hamas.asp
Oh an Israeli site, telling us a palestinian ceaseifre is meaningless.
Two nations that agree to a cease-fire without planning to attack later on is surrendering?? Are you speaking the same English I'm speaking?
One nation agreeing to a ceasefire without planning to attack later is surrendering Sandwich, unless your tring to tell me that Israel will dismantle all the settlements when this happens?
http://www.google.com/search?q=hamas+threatened+america
What they actually said does not contstrue a threat. It could be taken that way but they later clarified it.
I don't want to stir this up again, so I'm editing my reply in here as opposed to replying properly. I've been absent from HLP for a week or so, which is why I never replied until now.
The location of the Temple Mount isn't disputed.
So you're saying that settlements = attacking? Weird.
And quit running around in circles with definitions and redefinitions. The Hamas threatened America, and then thought better of it and tried to take it back by saying it wasn't a threat to begin with. Puh-leese.
// Sandwich
