[colecampbell666]

You can't argue about taste.

By that you mean?

[karajorma]

You can't argue about taste.

Of course you can. This is the internet. You're meant to flame and ridicule anyone for not having exactly the same taste in music, films and TV programmes as you do.

[achtung]

You can't argue about taste.

Of course you can. This is the internet. You're meant to flame and ridicule anyone for not having exactly the same taste in music, films and TV programmes as you do.

I flame people who do have the exact same views as me.

I don't like doppelgangers.

[chief1983]

You're wrong, and I'm not leaving until I've proven it.

[Ford Prefect]

I did. They really needed the cash.

I doubt he was too satisfied:

Ford Prefect
8D

I see no connection between my ability to satisfy Bon Jovi and my existence in eight dimensions.

[colecampbell666]

I always though that was supposed to be a smiley.

[S-99]

You can't argue about taste.

You can't argue about that nasty smell and taste in the morning that results from sleeping with your mouth open?

[Janos]

I always though that was supposed to be a smiley.

it's flabby tits and a spare tire

[Polpolion]

I flame people who do have the exact same views as me.

I don't like doppelgangers.

Quite frankly, that is one of the stupidest reasons for flaming someone I have ever heard. I could understand not liking doppelgangers, or not liking people who post stuff like "QFT" all the time, but if they have a valid opinion and it just happens to be the same as yours, it's IMHO moronic to just blatantly flame them for it.

Of course I can't tell if that really was just what you meant; not liking QFT-esque posts, rather than people who's opinions coincidentally coincide with yours. And now that I posted this, I bet it is what you meant.