Author Topic: For the Physics Geeks  (Read 3902 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Shrike

  • Postadmin
  • 211
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp
Quote
Originally posted by Styxx
* hums Evangelion theme *
*CAMs Eva*
WE ARE HARD LIGHT PRODUCTIONS. YOU WILL LOWER YOUR FIREWALLS AND SURRENDER YOUR KEYBOARDS. WE WILL ADD YOUR INTELLECTUAL AND VERNACULAR DISTINCTIVENESS TO OUR OWN. YOUR FORUMS WILL ADAPT TO SERVICE US. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

 

Offline Styxx

  • 211
    • Hard Light Productions
Quote
Originally posted by Shrike
*CAMs Eva*


Bah.
Probably away. Contact through email.

 

Offline Setekh

  • Jar of Clay
  • 215
    • Hard Light Productions
Quote
Originally posted by Shrike
*CAMs Eva*


*initiates Instrumentality and leaves Shrike behind*

Anyway, last I heard, there were 9 dimensions. What does this limit it to?
- Eddie Kent Woo, Setekh, Steak (of Steaks), AWACS. Seriously, just pick one.
HARD LIGHT PRODUCTIONS, now V3.0. Bringing Modders Together since January 2001.
THE HARD LIGHT ARRAY. Always makes you say wow.

 

Offline mikhael

  • Back to skool
  • 211
  • Fnord!
    • http://www.google.com/search?q=404error.com
This doesn't limit the number of possible dimensions, Steak. Other math does that.

If gravity is proved to be propogate at c, that means that it is explicitly not instantaneous. Brane-world theory suggests that some phenomena (like gravity) could take shortcuts through "rolled up" dimensions to get around the lightspeed limit. It also intimates, but doesn not outright state, that Einstein holds true for rolled up dimensions.

I'm curious as to whether the speed of gravity is constant (ie exactly c) or if it is merely approaches the limit with the interval determined other factors.

Also, a limit to the speed of gravitational propogation also may prevent Alcubierre's "warp drive" from being possible (of course, some of its other requirements may render that impossible before gravity even comes into play).

Quote
From Eishtmo:
You just found this out?

The experiment only confirmed what is generally excepted my most physists anyway, so it's nothing new.


The whole point of such experiments is to try to find circumstances where the theory breaks. "generally accepted" things MUST be tested, else you're not performing science, you're adhering to religion.

Venom, had  they shown a different result, I would not have laughed, I'd have wanted a deeper examination of the experiment, and repeats of the experiment. Finding a place where Einstein's theory breaks down would be the biggest news to date in the fields of cosmology and physics.
[I am not really here. This post is entirely a figment of your imagination.]

 

Offline Thorn

  • Drunk on the east coast.
  • 210
  • What is this? I don't even...
Maybe the speed of gravity is based on the mass of the object?
I dunno.. I slept through most of my phisics classes, so I really have no idea what the hell I'm talking about..

 

Offline vyper

  • 210
  • The Sexy Scotsman
Quote
Originally posted by Setekh


*initiates Instrumentality and leaves Shrike behind*

Anyway, last I heard, there were 9 dimensions. What does this limit it to?


42? :D Joke.

I thot it was 11 or something like that.
"But you live, you learn.  Unless you die.  Then you're ****ed." - aldo14

 

Offline wEvil

  • The Other Good Renderer
  • 28
    • http://www.andymelville.net
26 "compressable" to 11 using supersymmetry.

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
yeah, 26 was the number I heard before too. So is it really 26 or 11? (i.e. how many actual properties are needed to describe a quark/string?) I wish I knew more about this stuff...

 

Offline wEvil

  • The Other Good Renderer
  • 28
    • http://www.andymelville.net
its generally accepted to be 11, because in the 26 dimensional model you need a number of totally different methods to come out with a hollistic idea, whereas in the 11-d method you wind up without all the "fiddly bits". dont ask me about the equations behind it - I don't have a sodding clue, i'm not into rows and rows of funny math symbols on blackboards.

 

Offline CODEDOG ND

  • Dark Agent
  • 27
nerds! nerds! nerds!
It's a fact.  Stupid people have stupid children.  If you are stupid, don't have sex.  If you insist on having sex.  Have sex with animals.  If you have sex with an animal.  Make sure the animal is smarter than you are.  Just encase of some biological fluke you and the animal have offspring, they won't be as stupid as you are.   One more thing.  Don't assume the animal is protected.  If the animal has a condom, or if female some interuterian device, insist they wear it.  Help stop this mindless mindlessness.  Keep your stupidty to yourself.  This message was brought to you by the Committee of Concerned Citizens that are Smarter than You are.

 

Offline Grey Wolf

Quote
Originally posted by Styxx
* wonders about the effects of that on the next Honor Harrington book *

:D
You're right. There goes the grav sensors, the grav pulse communications, possibly the whole propulsion system.
You see things; and you say "Why?" But I dream things that never were; and I say "Why not?" -George Bernard Shaw

 

Offline mikhael

  • Back to skool
  • 211
  • Fnord!
    • http://www.google.com/search?q=404error.com
Quote
Originally posted by wEvil
26 "compressable" to 11 using supersymmetry.


26, 14, 11, 10 or 12, depending on which version of A) string theory, B) brane-world theory and C) supersymmetric theory you personally seem to subscribe too. Switch up components and you end up with different numbers. Last I heard, the "accepted" number was 10 or 12, not 26 and 11.
[I am not really here. This post is entirely a figment of your imagination.]

  

Offline diamondgeezer

« Last Edit: January 10, 2003, 11:35:27 pm by 170 »