Author Topic: New air speed record - 5000 mph!  (Read 6261 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
Quote
Originally posted by Kalfireth
They need standard rockets/jets to get it up to operational speed/height though - don't they?

Um.... well, based on vague memory and this document - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3575561.stm - the advantage of a scramjet is that it doesn't need to carry an oxygen source.  i.e. saving weight.

 

Offline diamondgeezer

New air speed record - 5000 mph!
Possibly as a booster ofr stuff like Space Ship One, but that uses a 'basic' ramjet AFAIK. Scrams would be used for sub-orbital atmospheric stuff

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
Scramjet to orbit, ion-drive in space?

 

Offline Liberator

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 210
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
Conventional jets to get to altitude
Scrams for cruising
Rockets for Orbital Insertion
Ion Drive for spacial manuvering
So as through a glass, and darkly
The age long strife I see
Where I fought in many guises,
Many names, but always me.

There are only 10 types of people in the world , those that understand binary and those that don't.

 

Offline diamondgeezer

New air speed record - 5000 mph!
Watch out, Burt

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
Quote
Originally posted by Kalfireth
But who knows, in time it could be possible to take this technology and refine it into something more plausable. I fail to believe that Concorde is the fastest way to get civilians from one side of the planet to the other.


British Aerospace planned a plane with a hybrid rocket/air engine  called HOTOL  a while back. Apparently this thing could make it to Australia from the UK in 30 minutes.

No one was willing to put any money into the idea :rolleyes:

And people wonder why engineers and scientists train in the UK but work abroad! :mad:
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Nico

  • Venom
    Parlez-vous Model Magician?
  • 212
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
Quote
Originally posted by Kalfireth
I fail to believe that Concorde is the fastest way to get civilians from one side of the planet to the other.


Well, you're right: it's something slower, coz the concorde is on retired status :p
SCREW CANON!

 

Offline Fineus

  • ...But you *have* heard of me.
  • Administrator
  • 212
    • Hard Light Productions
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
Exactly, talk about a step backwards for humanity... we can spend time making war with eachother - but when it comes to moving people from one place to another we're stuck with 747s or nothing.

 

Offline Zarax

  • 210
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
The next jumbo generation is coming...
Fear the new Airbus!
The Best is Yet to Come

 

Offline Setekh

  • Jar of Clay
  • 215
    • Hard Light Productions
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
Quote
Originally posted by karajorma
No one was willing to put any money into the idea :rolleyes:

And people wonder why engineers and scientists train in the UK but work abroad! :mad:


It's the same with Australia. All of our cool inventions get sold overseas. :sigh:
- Eddie Kent Woo, Setekh, Steak (of Steaks), AWACS. Seriously, just pick one.
HARD LIGHT PRODUCTIONS, now V3.0. Bringing Modders Together since January 2001.
THE HARD LIGHT ARRAY. Always makes you say wow.

 

Offline Petrarch of the VBB

  • Koala-monkey
  • 211
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
I'm going to change all that.

In recent months I've invented Pogo-Crutches, Ghandi Shandy and Brucifixion, all of which I'm going to sell to British companies.

Yes

 
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
Quote
Originally posted by Ghostavo
Sorry, either way, is there anything new about this engine that could have an effect in future space travels?



:nod:  
Scram jet propulsion is the most efficient form of propulsion in the mach 5 - 11 (ish) range. The only other option for propulsion at this speed is a rocket - and they are crap, with respect to efficiency.  Unfortunatly scram jets need a minimun speed to opperate, so you can't launch one from the ground.  Scram jets can't acheive orbital speed (or height) either, but they can get you most of the way there.

Scram jets are a big step towards combined cycle launch vehicles, that use the most efficient engine over its respective speed range. Ie, a highly efficient launch vehicle could...

From 0 to mach 0.5 (400mph) use a turboprop (propellor) engine. However they cannot go faster, really.

So from mach 0.5 - mach 0.9 use a turbofan (normal civil jet engine).

From mach 0.9 - mach 2.5/3 use a turbojet (military tyoe jet engine)

Mach 3-6 ramjet.

Mach 6-11 scramjet.

Mach 11 - orbital speed, rocket.

This sort of launch vehicle utilises the most effective form of propulsion over the relevant speed range.  Problem is, no single engine can preform in all of these modes, and 6 seperate engines is going to weigh so much its not even worth thinking about.

A good solution (though there are a few) is to carry your launch vehicle to high altitude, 50000ft or so, on the back of another aircraft, powered by efficient jet engines.   Launch vehicle then seperates,  flies under scramjet power as high and as fast as it can, then kicks in a rocket motor for the final burn to space.
This is highly effective, as the jet aircraft can be re-used, and is relatively cheap to fuel.  The launch vehicle itself gets a 'free ride' some of the way there, and only has to carry 2 types of engines. This sort of vehicle could carry roughly 10-15% of its weight as cargo - compaired to conventional rockets which are luck to get 3% (payload mass fraction), making getting anything into orbit considerably cheaper.

Scramjets are a major leap forward to this sort of launch, and cheaper space travel.

So, "is there anything new about this engine that could have an effect in future space travels?" - yes.

"Your cynicism appauls me Collosus - I have ten thousand officers and crew willing to die for pants !"

"Go to red alert!"
"Are you sure sir? It does mean changing the bulb"

 
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
beatspete, I find thine reasoning a twinge incorrect.

Turboprob engines, be they ye simplest form known to man, can indeed reach out into the yonder at mach .5 . Their average airspeed velocity does not exceed that of an unladen african swallow.

Turbofan engines, be they ye product of times past the second war, can reach into the high sub-Mach speeds, but they be not of civilian creation. I remindeth thee of the F-4 Phantom and the A-10 were both of turbofan construction.

Military engines can indeed reach Mach 3, but them as achieved it hath been known to undertake speeds even higher, from mach 3.2 by a russian Foxbat to that of an SR-71 Blackbird, which reacheth speeds past Mach 5.

Ramjets and scramjets indeed can be used from a range of Mach 5 beyond, but them that are used needeth high altitude to launch. Sixty thousand feet being the minimum, rarely reached by any plane. The knowledge contained within the engines hath potential uses, but many moons will pass until the knowledge be put to use.
A Seth is a terrible thing to waste. The reverse applies for Shivans.

"Look at you, Hacker... a pathetic creature of meat and bone, panting and sweating as you run through my corridors... How can you challenge a PERFECT, IMMORTAL MACHINE?"
        -- Shodan, the Devil of Citadel Station, 2072 AD

-= Freshly hooked on LSD... er, DSL=-

 

Offline StratComm

  • The POFressor
  • 212
  • Cameron Crazy
    • http://www.geocities.com/cek_83/index.html
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
This old english technobabbel is a bit confounding, I must admit.  At any rate, the fastest air-speed by a turbofan engine is the blackbird, at approximately Mach 3.5.  The engine can probably goest faster, but the structural composition and design of the aircraft prohibit anything faster.  Ramjets work from about 400mph (Mach .6 or so, about the speed of a commercial airliner) up to relatively fast speeds, often hitting a material limit at Mach 3.5 as well though this can probably be improved upon.  Scramjet engines, though (at least as far as I can tell) don't even start to work until Mach 5, so there's still a bit of a gap in getting up to speed.  One could envision a multi-stage vehicule jettisoning everything but orbital boosters and scramjet boosters once this speed has been achieved, but I think that only chemical rockets wilt actually goest fast enough to start the things.
who needs a signature? ;)
It's not much of an excuse for a website, but my stuff can be found here

"Holding the last thread on a page comes with an inherent danger, especially when you are edit-happy with your posts.  For you can easily continue editing in points without ever noticing that someone else could have refuted them." ~Me, on my posting behavior

Last edited by StratComm on 08-23-2027 at 08:34 PM

 
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
Quote
Rebuttal originating from the wisdom of Stealth[cro]
beatspete, I find thine reasoning a twinge incorrect.

Turboprob engines, be they ye simplest form known to man, can indeed reach out into the yonder at mach .5 . Their average airspeed velocity dost not exceed that of an unladen african swallow.


How do you know so much about swallows?
But how fast can it go carrying a coconut? :D (my mate is monty python finatic)

Quote
Rebuttal originating from the wisdom of Stealth[cro]

Turbofan engines, be they ye product of times past the second war, can reach into the high sub-Mach speeds, but they be not of civilian creation. I remindeth thee of the F-4 Phantom and the A-10 were both of turbofan construction.


Balderdash I sayeth! Balderdash! (spelling?)

A-10's max speed is around 420mph. Other than this being the official speed from the powers that be, an a-10 will never go supersonic in level flight.  If you dropped it nose down, it might, but the engines dont have supersonic intakes, without the diffusion required to reduce the flow speed to something acceptable for the fan.  
The formation of localised supersonic shockwaves would probably stop the aircraft going supersonic through the drag, regardless of the engines ability.

http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=70

As for the F-4 Phanton, it was flying before turbofans were invented - 1958 first flight.
"Power plant:  Two 17,900-pound-thrust General Electric J79-GE-17 jet engines
Speed:  1,485 mph (max.) "
from... http://www.boeing.com/history/mdc/phantomII.htm

"The J79 is a single-shaft re-heated turbojet engine "
Not a turbofan then.  (from www.mtu.de)

Doesnt mean that there are no supersonic turbofans.  Low bypass ratio turbofans, are used by the Euro Fighter (rolls royce EJ2000), and a few others...
However a high bypass ratio turbofan will never go supersonic, in the way that a propellor (unless specially designed) will not. The speed of the flow into the engines needs to be quite low, and unless you built a massive intake duct, with huge drag, might i add, supersonic will never happen.

Quote
Rebuttal originating from the wisdom of Stealth[cro]

Military engines can indeed reach Mach 3, but them as achieved it hath been known to undertake speeds even higher, from mach 3.2 by a russian Foxbat to that of an SR-71 Blackbird, which reacheth speeds past Mach 5.


SR-71, from aerospaceweb.org...
"PERFORMANCE:  
Max Level Speed  at altitude: 2,275 mph (3,660 km/h) at 80,000 ft (24,385 m), Mach 3.35 [world record]"

Not mach 5. Thats a rumour for people who live too close to airbases and take too many drugs.


Quote
Rebuttal originating from the wisdom of Stealth[cro]

Ramjets and scramjets indeed can be used from a range of Mach 5 beyond, but them that art used needeth high altitude to launch. Sixty thousand feet being the minimum, rarely reached by any plane. The knowledge contained within the engines hath potential uses, but many moons wilt pass until the knowledge be put to use.


More balderdash! Stratcomm seems to know his stuff, however.


Beatspete - resident Aerospace Master.  Would 'Aero-Lord' be more fitting, given the recent theme?

Well, unchallenged HLP Aero-lord as yet. Interesting title...

hint hint...?

"Your cynicism appauls me Collosus - I have ten thousand officers and crew willing to die for pants !"

"Go to red alert!"
"Are you sure sir? It does mean changing the bulb"

 
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
Quote
Originally posted by beatspete


How do you know so much about swallows?
But how fast can it go carrying a coconut? :D (my mate is monty python finatic)

Exactly my point ;) But one swallow can't carry a coconut around! It's not the trouble of where to grip it, it's a matter of weight ratios! A three-ounce bird can't carry a one-pound coconut! :lol:



Quote
Balderdash I sayeth! Balderdash! (spelling?)

A-10's max speed is around 420mph. Other than this being the official speed from the powers that be, an a-10 will never go supersonic in level flight.  If you dropped it nose down, it might, but the engines dont have supersonic intakes, without the diffusion required to reduce the flow speed to something acceptable for the fan.  

Negative. An A-10 has a top speed of 805 km/h (497 mph), and as I already said, it's a turbofan engine. You said turbofans went over Mach 1, which they never do.

Quote
The formation of localised supersonic shockwaves would probably stop the aircraft going supersonic through the drag, regardless of the engines ability.

Besides, the Thunderbolt-II wasn't MEANT to go supersonic, it's supposed to kick the dirt up and make it stay that way. Plus, with THAT airframe it's not going anywhere. :D

Quote
Doesnt mean that there are no supersonic turbofans.  Low bypass ratio turbofans, are used by the Euro Fighter (rolls royce EJ2000), and a few others...
However a high bypass ratio turbofan will never go supersonic, in the way that a propellor (unless specially designed) will not. The speed of the flow into the engines needs to be quite low, and unless you built a massive intake duct, with huge drag, might i add, supersonic will never happen.

Well, that would explain the huge intake under the EF. I wonder if the russian MiG-35 uses the same, knowing how it looks.



Quote
SR-71, from aerospaceweb.org...
"PERFORMANCE:  
Max Level Speed  at altitude: 2,275 mph (3,660 km/h) at 80,000 ft (24,385 m), Mach 3.35 [world record]"

Not mach 5. Thats a rumour for people who live too close to airbases and take too many drugs.

Mea culpa. It is 3.35 as you mentioned. But not even close to a world record, not to mention the fact it's a recon jet which doesn't give it much benefit. It's odd how the world's fastest direct-combat jet is a russian pile of metal over thirty years old...
A Seth is a terrible thing to waste. The reverse applies for Shivans.

"Look at you, Hacker... a pathetic creature of meat and bone, panting and sweating as you run through my corridors... How can you challenge a PERFECT, IMMORTAL MACHINE?"
        -- Shodan, the Devil of Citadel Station, 2072 AD

-= Freshly hooked on LSD... er, DSL=-

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
A west african or european swallow?

  
New air speed record - 5000 mph!
As I already said, it has to be african, nevermind it being non-migratory ;)
A Seth is a terrible thing to waste. The reverse applies for Shivans.

"Look at you, Hacker... a pathetic creature of meat and bone, panting and sweating as you run through my corridors... How can you challenge a PERFECT, IMMORTAL MACHINE?"
        -- Shodan, the Devil of Citadel Station, 2072 AD

-= Freshly hooked on LSD... er, DSL=-