Author Topic: Anti-gravity: why don´t they research it?  (Read 3667 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline FireCrack

  • 210
  • meh...
Anti-gravity: why don´t they research it?
the mag in maglev stands for magnetic. Not antigravity (unless you consider somthing as rudimentary as picking somthing up antigrav)
actualy, mabye not.
"When ink and pen in hands of men Inscribe your form, bipedal P They draw an altar on which God has slaughtered all stability, no eyes could ever soak in all the places you anoint, and yet to see you all at once we only need the point. Flirting with infinity, your geometric progeny that fit inside you oh so tight with triangles that feel so right."
3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944 59230781640628620899862803482534211706...
"Your ever-constant homily says flaw is discipline, the patron saint of imperfection frees us from our sin. And if our transcendental lift shall find a final floor, then Man will know the death of God where wonder was before."

 

Offline vyper

  • 210
  • The Sexy Scotsman
Anti-gravity: why don´t they research it?
Oddly enough it still qualifies.
"But you live, you learn.  Unless you die.  Then you're ****ed." - aldo14

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Anti-gravity: why don´t they research it?
Yes, but I think the original experiments in Anti-Gravity involved investigating the repulsion of magnetic fields in the hope it would explain something about gravity, I'm not certain though.

 

Offline Nico

  • Venom
    Parlez-vous Model Magician?
  • 212
Anti-gravity: why don´t they research it?
Random link from the first page given by google of something I heard on radio this morning:

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/9844

w00t, 1300 wackos who knows **** about what they're talking about!

Mmh... make sail!
SCREW CANON!

 

Offline Flaser

  • 210
  • man/fish warsie
Anti-gravity: why don´t they research it?
Quote
Originally posted by Flaser


Bobb yer in love with a technology mothernature invented a long while ago.

Ethanol be also removes th'pollution it creates.
The reason be that th'plants are perfect carbon sythesizer - they build themselves out o' thin air. All th'carbon ye burn comes from th'air, so th'net added CO2 be zero.

Thermal depolemerisation can be a godsend t'chemistry, but burnin' th'oil ye produce be th'worth thin' anyone could do with it.
There are myriads o' plastics an' other oil products that also badly need it as a base material.

Ethanol be lot better t'burn as fuel as it be a lot simpler an' lighter molecule than average petrol.


WHAT THE ****!? :nervous:  :wtf: :eek2:
"I was going to become a speed dealer. If one stupid fairytale turns out to be total nonsense, what does the young man do? If you answered, “Wake up and face reality,” you don’t remember what it was like being a young man. You just go to the next entry in the catalogue of lies you can use to destroy your life." - John Dolan

  

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Anti-gravity: why don´t they research it?
Ahoy!