Then again, what right is there to say such a thing? Iran is a country as much as we are and they can make their own decisions, if you believe in what America is for.
Iran has the right to make its own decisions, but I have the right to not agree with them. Since the majority of Iranians would agree with me that the Iranian government isn't the best government the country could have, then I'd say Iran is spot-on to make some new decisions.
While Iran does have the right to make its own decisions, does that make what it does in violation of any sort of natural or human right correct? Doesn't unjustly convicting and hanging a 16-year-old girl on bogus charges purely inspired by religious fanaticism
somehow violate what government is about?
I'm not intolerant of other cultures, as you seem to think I am; I'm intolerant of governments oppressing their constituents and citizens and then attempting to place some big bad other country as the scapegoat for all the country's internal and external problems when, in reality, it's the country's own government attempting to abuse religion in order to have its citizens blindly obey or be ostracized.
And yes, I'm referring to both the US and Iran, since there's a lot of problems with both. However, the US is in a position to actually
fix itself--elections, the Supreme Court, Congress, and the First Amendment. Iran, on the other hand, is ruled by an ultra-conservative wacko who constantly tempts the West into bombing his country back to the Stone Age just to prove a point about "The Great Satan." Religion, not the the rule of law, dominates; human rights are dictated by the Qu'ran, in some cases inaccurately... As JFK said, those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable. The way Iran's going, I'm afraid we're going to see violent revolution inevitably...