Poll

Which MBT is superior?

Merkava Mk IV (Israel)
5 (7.4%)
Callenger 2 (Great Britian)
8 (11.8%)
M1-A2 Abram (USA)
16 (23.5%)
T-90A (Russia)
5 (7.4%)
Leopard 2 (Germany)
17 (25%)
Snuffulpagus Dreadnought (Other)
17 (25%)
Awesome Face Mega Tank (Other)
0 (0%)
Type-10 (Japan)
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 68

Author Topic: Which Main Battle Tank is better? (Personal Opinion counts!)  (Read 17119 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Which Main Battle Tank is better? (Personal Opinion counts!)
The governor is probably the first thing a crew takes off the tank in case they ever need the extra speed/power.
And the turbine engine is claimed to reach up to 2000 HP when ungoverned.

Sure the final drives and transmission would be about as reliable as those of an early Panther D tank (which is the reason for the 1500 HP limit), but it pretty much makes the Abrams a 63-ish metric ton tank that could rival a Christie in performance.


Edit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5XUQ2beGfM
« Last Edit: February 09, 2012, 04:33:40 pm by BengalTiger »
'Teeth of the Tiger' - campaign in the making
Story, Ships, Weapons, Project Leader.

  
Re: Which Main Battle Tank is better? (Personal Opinion counts!)
Remember reading in newspaper or online article that in a recent (Maybe 1-2 year old now) Army competition that the Swedish Leopard 2 beat out all the other MBT's in the world and basically outperformed them by 3x the efficiency and speed etc.

Swedish Leopard 2???? LEOPARD 2 IS GERMAN!!!!

Ok now to vote:

I would choose the Leopard 3, if you could vote for him.  ;7
I am sleeping very well in my qietschie Bettgestell :D
-------------------------------------------------------------