Well its a form of art isn't it? I don't know if it makes a whole lot of sense yet, but ive just scratched the surface. Right now its just dealing with grammer:
Language of the AncientsLvi Ciusoa-sYhsiaThe Ancient's language is different then our own in many different ways, so it is neccesary to adapt to a new form of grammer. For example, as seen above, the word "Ancients" is replaced by what the Ancient's actually call themselves, the "sYhsia". Ciusoa rougly translates to language, but expands to the global term "speaking". Lvi is a linking word, used before a linked set of words. In english, we put the actual linking word between words, for example, this and that. The "and" connects this, that. The Lvi initiates the link, then the required words are linked together using a dash (-). This allows multiple words to be linked it series, in english we could go this, this and that. In Ancients it would be Lvi sia-sia-aops'v. More details will be discussed later. There are no acronymes in Ancient's, instead, a generalization is formed, and preceeded by PraS. For example, SJ Sathanas, would be broken down into Shivan vessel Sathanas. In ancient's it would be PraS Kaiufo Tr'a Deiso. Generalization can be useful in other situations, but the preceeding word is changed accordingly. For example, cat and dog are both animals, so this can be broadly catagorized when the physical examples of "cat" and "dog" are irrelvent. So in Ancient's it would be PrAs fisoaU. As you probably have noted, capitalization is highly relevent. PraS and PrAs are two different words, and mean two different things, but belong to the same idea. In fact, when describing the words in Ancients, we could generalize them, they are both the same string of characters, ignoring case (PrAs Lvi lkus-faimz).
Words that have multiple meanings that are just amplifications or downsizing of the core word are expressed as compounds seperated by commas (,). For example, if something is unpleasent, that is just downsizing hate. vissas is used to increase the meaning of a word, and isovus is used to decrease the meaning. The severity of the increase or decrease of the word is expressed as the amount of letters that are capitalized in the modifier. For example, unpleasent would be expressed as ISOVus,cau. Plural words are expressed as how many objects the word is actually refering to. An unknown, or infinite amount is simply expressed by adding si' to the start of the word. If a direct amount is refered to, the amount is added after the si. For example, talking about three cats would be siao'Fisvusa, but just talking about cats would be si'Fisvusa. This would not be correct: Gavao si'Fisvusa, as it adds unneccesary words, but would mean "three cats" in a direct transformation to english. As you can see in that last example however, Gav was added to the word three. This is because the word has become seperated from its core function, and therefor Gav has been added to show independence. So potentially, saying "three threes" would result in aosi'Gavao.
----
opinions?
