Author Topic: A challenge to all recreational mathematicians  (Read 6044 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Razor

  • 210
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
Ah crap. Math sucks. If I were like CP, and did all this math crap, I would have gone crazy 2 days later. :shaking:

 

Offline Neon

  • 26
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
*picks up shotgun from under the seat and tries to shoot down this thread*

  

Offline Sandwich

  • Got Screen?
  • 213
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Brainzipper
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
Guys, quit the math/CP bashing - now.  :mad: Like Venom said in his Anime render thread - if you don't like it, don't go there. Personally, while I don't understand a single thing here, I find it fascinating that people are applying their minds to something actually useful outside of render and 3D modelling techniques. I can understand if this was a thread about something else, and maths was brought into the discussion just out of spite, but it isn't, and it wasn't, so cut it out.
SERIOUSLY...! | {The Sandvich Bar} - Rhino-FS2 Tutorial | CapShip Turret Upgrade | The Complete FS2 Ship List | System Background Package

"...The quintessential quality of our age is that of dreams coming true. Just think of it. For centuries we have dreamt of flying; recently we made that come true: we have always hankered for speed; now we have speeds greater than we can stand: we wanted to speak to far parts of the Earth; we can: we wanted to explore the sea bottom; we have: and so  on, and so on: and, too, we wanted the power to smash our enemies utterly; we have it. If we had truly wanted peace, we should have had that as well. But true peace has never been one of the genuine dreams - we have got little further than preaching against war in order to appease our consciences. The truly wishful dreams, the many-minded dreams are now irresistible - they become facts." - 'The Outward Urge' by John Wyndham

"The very essence of tolerance rests on the fact that we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Stretching right back to Kant, through the Frankfurt School and up to today, liberalism means that we can do anything we like as long as we don't hurt others. This means that if we are tolerant of others' intolerance - especially when that intolerance is a call for genocide - then all we are doing is allowing that intolerance to flourish, and allowing the violence that will spring from that intolerance to continue unabated." - Bren Carlill

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
Thanks, Sandwich, although I don't really mind it too much. ;) :D

Quote
Some of us less enlightened (but no less interested in mathematics) haven't heard of some of these things. Links are A-1 SUPAR. :) For example, what is G, the gamma function, the beta function, and Khinchin's Law?

On that note, thanks for describing K(x). :) What is it used for?


Sure; I don't have much time at the moment, but I will point you to some links.

The gamma function is basically an extension of the usual factorial to noninteger arguments, and the two are related by G(x+1) = x! . There is a bunch of information about this one available here:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GammaFunction.html

There exist several formulas and identities for this function as well, some of which can be used to prove that product result I gave earlier.

G is called Glaisher's constant and is actually defined by that limit; I think it is not known whether the constant is irrational, (although it is likely to be). It can be written in terms of derivatives of the zeta function, but not in terms of any of the usual functions or constants. I would post a link for this as well but the site I usually go to for constant-related information is currently down.

Here's one neat identity I can remember at the moment:

(pi and e you know, G is Glaisher's constant, and g is Euler's constant)

As for Khinchin's Law, it has to do with continued fractions. A CF is an "infinite fraction" of the following form:


Just like there is a decimal representation for every number, there is also a CF representation. For rational numbers, the CF does not go on forever but terminates. It turns out that, while irrational numbers have no periodic repeats in their decimal form, such patterns do frequently exist in CF form, and many common roots and constants can be expressed as CFs with some pattern in them. What Khinchin found is that, for almost all real numbers, taking the geometric mean of the numbers in the CF (a1, a2, a3, etc.) actually yields a special constant that is independent of the original number. In fact, if you select a real number completely randomly, the probability that it will satisfy Khinchin's law is actually 100%. (there are numbers that do not satisfy it, but there are infinitely more that do satisfy it) The constant is called Khinchin's constant and is given by the following infinite product:


It is not known to be expressible in terms of any other functions or constants, although there are a few really messy integrals and sums that give it.

I am not too experienced with this stuff myself so I do not know exactly why this law is true, but you can find some more information here: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/KhinchinsConstant.html


If you find this stuff interesting, let me know, as I can go on about this all day. :D

Quote
Are you sure you have the series correct?


:o looks like I wrote that one in all wrong; it should be ( ep - e-p ) / (2p), or sinh(p)/p. sorry about that; I think those errors got buried in all the html/vb tags. :p
« Last Edit: November 08, 2002, 11:49:50 am by 296 »

 

Offline Joey_21

  • 28
    • http://denebsystem.cjb.net/
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
Quote
Originally posted by CP5670
:o looks like I wrote that one in all wrong; it should be ( ep - e-p ) / (2p), or sinh(p)/p. sorry about that; I think those errors got buried in all the html/vb tags. :p


Ah, ok, that works. :)

I went to the 100000000th term in the series and came up with 3.1415926460901864... after applying the inverse hyperbolic sine to it.



How do you generate Gamma(x) in terms of a series and whatnot?
« Last Edit: November 07, 2002, 12:43:34 pm by 34 »

 

Offline Goober5000

  • HLP Loremaster
  • 214
    • Goober5000 Productions
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
Yeah, this is cool stuff. :)

 

Offline Sandwich

  • Got Screen?
  • 213
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Brainzipper
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
Quote
Originally posted by CP5670
G is called Glaisher's constant and is actually defined by that limit; I think it is not known whether the constant is irrational, (although it is likely to be). It can be written in terms of derivatives of the zeta function, but not in terms of any of the usual functions or constants. I would post a link for this as well but the site I usually go to for constant-related information is currently down.


Y'know, you should offer your services as a tech description writer - you certainly have a handle on all the techno-jargon. ;)
SERIOUSLY...! | {The Sandvich Bar} - Rhino-FS2 Tutorial | CapShip Turret Upgrade | The Complete FS2 Ship List | System Background Package

"...The quintessential quality of our age is that of dreams coming true. Just think of it. For centuries we have dreamt of flying; recently we made that come true: we have always hankered for speed; now we have speeds greater than we can stand: we wanted to speak to far parts of the Earth; we can: we wanted to explore the sea bottom; we have: and so  on, and so on: and, too, we wanted the power to smash our enemies utterly; we have it. If we had truly wanted peace, we should have had that as well. But true peace has never been one of the genuine dreams - we have got little further than preaching against war in order to appease our consciences. The truly wishful dreams, the many-minded dreams are now irresistible - they become facts." - 'The Outward Urge' by John Wyndham

"The very essence of tolerance rests on the fact that we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Stretching right back to Kant, through the Frankfurt School and up to today, liberalism means that we can do anything we like as long as we don't hurt others. This means that if we are tolerant of others' intolerance - especially when that intolerance is a call for genocide - then all we are doing is allowing that intolerance to flourish, and allowing the violence that will spring from that intolerance to continue unabated." - Bren Carlill

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
Quote

How do you generate Gamma(x) in terms of a series and whatnot?


For numerical computations, there is something called Stirling's asymptotic series that is valid for about z>1/2, and gets very accurate for higher values: (this is actually based on the limit I posted with the factorial; it converges on order x-5)



To get negative values using that, use the following relation: (this one is an exact formula)

G(-z) = - p csc( pz ) / G(z+1)

Quote

Y'know, you should offer your services as a tech description writer - you certainly have a handle on all the techno-jargon.


lol thanks, maybe I should try writing bits of this stuff in the weapon descriptions... :D
« Last Edit: November 08, 2002, 11:51:16 am by 296 »

 

Offline Joey_21

  • 28
    • http://denebsystem.cjb.net/
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
Quote
Originally posted by CP5670


For numerical computations, there is something called Stirling's asymptotic series that is valid for about z>1/2, and gets very accurate for higher values: (this is actually based on the limit I posted with the factorial; it converges on order x-5)



To get negative values using that, use the following relation: (this one is an exact formula)

G(-z) = - p csc( px ) / G(z+1)


Would you mind posting a link to where I could find this series? :p

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
:wtf: it looks like all the images on that site were switched around; I better edit my posts... :p

one moment...

[edit] okay, I updated the links; let's hope they stay like that now... :p

 

Offline Joey_21

  • 28
    • http://denebsystem.cjb.net/
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
hmm how exactly do you get

(1+1/(12z)+1/(288z²)-139/(51840z³)-571/(2488320z4))

aka how are those values computed so i can find the nth term?

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
There are both recursive and explicit evaluations of the coefficients, but they are extremely complicated and themselves involve several gamma functions. :p However, there is a fairly simple series for the logarithm of the gamma function, of which taking the exponential yields direct gamma function values. (this can be derived directly from Binet's second formula) I also added in the above series with a few more terms on it:

« Last Edit: November 08, 2002, 03:03:00 pm by 296 »

 

Offline Cannikin

  • 800 Gigatons of Whoop-Ass
  • 26
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
Bleh, forget these stupid expressions. Here's a simple challenge: write out googolplex (10^(10^100)) :p

 

Offline Petrarch of the VBB

  • Koala-monkey
  • 211
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
You fool, Graham's number is much higher than a googolplex!

 
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
triple integrals anyone?
"I am about to drop the hammer and dispense some indiscriminant justice!" -Starcraft

"First rule of government spending, why build one for the price of one, when you can have two for twice the price." - S.R. Hadden (Contact)

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
just use the dirichlet multiple integral reduction on those; it works well for most of the common regions and integrands. :nod:

 

Offline Cannikin

  • 800 Gigatons of Whoop-Ass
  • 26
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
Quote
Originally posted by Petrarch of th VBB
You fool, Graham's number is much higher than a googolplex!


I never said it was higher. I said it was a "simple challenge". And if it's so much smaller, write it out :p
« Last Edit: November 11, 2002, 06:06:42 pm by 783 »

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
still big enough to eat up all of gamespy's webspace though... :p

 

Offline Joey_21

  • 28
    • http://denebsystem.cjb.net/
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
< nevermind > this is too risky for my processor :D
« Last Edit: November 11, 2002, 09:50:53 pm by 34 »

 

Offline Goober5000

  • HLP Loremaster
  • 214
    • Goober5000 Productions
A challenge to all recreational mathematicians
That would be 100*100*100 = 1,000,000.  A lot less than a googolplex.

A googol is
10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

And a googolplex is 10 raised to that. :D

EDIT: ARGH!  Why is the number all chopped up?