[Ashrak]

I added the glows to Ed's model

[Tiara]

1). The lense flare... well...

2). Nebula is... too bright

3). The lense flare... well...

4). The Sovereign

I love star trek ships (although not the series )

[Ashrak]

uhhuh so whats WRONG with the flare?

[Tiara]

Originally posted by Ashrak
uhhuh so whats WRONG with the flare?

Its just

Its not like you use your poloroid to take pictures in space. Maybe its just me, I just don't like outher space renders with lense flare. Now animations is a whole different story.

[Ashrak]

ahhah BTW without the flare it would suck worse TRUST ME i tried it i re rendered that thing like what 5 times or so different suns nebula ETC and the left side of sovie has a hole in the hull so i couldnt get full use of neb

[Warlock]

Originally posted by Tiara


Its just

Its not like you use your poloroid to take pictures in space. Maybe its just me, I just don't like outher space renders with lense flare. Now animations is a whole different story.

Isn't a render implied as a still image of an animation thou ?

Besides ,.. even though one might not use a polaroid in space...I'm quite sure whatever device was choosen to capture an image would indeed include a lens on it

[Ashrak]

thanx warlock

[Ashrak]

Tiara Special

[Tiara]

I like it better already

But ofcourse another nitpick Motion blur would be nice...

[Ashrak]

how much motion blur?

[Warlock]

Unless the ship's entering warp I wouldn't do much....think of the shows,... for the most part the larger ships seemed to actually be going slow at Impulse speeds.

So say if your motionblur setting was 0-100 .... I'd stay below 40

[Carl]

it's really not "new"; i mean, it debuted 8 years ago.

[Ashrak]

carl........im watching TNG just now and i have NEVER seen a ST film or series before so PARDON ME but im new at this