Last night I was watching a program about Nero and how Rome burned. During the last parts of the program they were talking about how Nero blamed the Christians for the fire and why he would have chosen them for it. This I had no problem with because it's good reporting. Though since I read a book recently about bias in TV, the books name is "BIAS". So I was expecting the program to be more condemming of the Christians. Then much to my supprise they had a guy on there that said Nero might have been right. He said that a Christian reading the letters Paul and the others wrote to them spured extreamist/terrerist like feelings in them to burn Rome. He cited Revelations for this. Now I saw a few problems with this guy's theory.
#1 this guy is citing a book that was written (Bible scholars believe it was written around 69 A.D.)
after the burning of Rome (about 64 A.D.). Now his threoy is invalid.

loser.
#2 He and others said that the Christians were not Roman but Mediterranean something-or-other. Why would a bunch of these people move to Rome when they just could have stayed where they were? And why would a christian burn his home, friends, and family? Now I can see a few Mediterranean something-or-other's there to tell the Romans about Jesus.
#3 On top of all of this he had no, I repeat, no archeological evidence to support his claim.
His only source, the Bible.
There I think my thoughts are in order. I'll try to clarify if any have questions.