Author Topic: anyone have the old pof specs on hand  (Read 3142 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
anyone have the old pof specs on hand
I need the old POF specs for soemthing, I know there up on D-net somewere but it seems to be down, at the moment all I need is the header but I will need all the origonal data types (and anychanges anyone may have made, other than my self, though I think I'm the only one who has changed anything)
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 

Offline Inquisitor

anyone have the old pof specs on hand
Look at the web cvs for the file(s) in question, there will be a changelog for the file.

Can you make your decal code optional for the time being? Unless you are working on fixing that rendering bug?

Want to get a build out for folks :)
No signature.

 

Offline Rampage

  • Son Of Rampage
  • 211
  • Urogynaecologist
anyone have the old pof specs on hand
I was just looking at them.  Click Here.

Also Bobboau, check out the MODELVIEW32 source code, in case if you haven't looked at them already.  
I'm So Bored!

Rampage
« Last Edit: December 26, 2002, 09:58:15 am by 255 »

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
anyone have the old pof specs on hand
well the page is back up,
odds are the uploading / updateing of the MV source is what was causeing the problems I was haveing

well technicaly the decals should be totaly optional right now if you don't indicate a decal in the tables for a weapon it should never make a decal and if there are no decals made it will never render them, and if it doesn't render them then there is no slowdown,
if it isn't that needs to be fixed though
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 

Offline Goober5000

  • HLP Loremaster
  • Moderator
  • 214
    • Goober5000 Productions
anyone have the old pof specs on hand
Quote
Originally posted by Inquisitor
Can you make your decal code optional for the time being? Unless you are working on fixing that rendering bug?


I just ran the most recent release build and didn't notice any slowdown - interestingly enough, the framerate was faster with fs2_open than with FS2 itself!  Must be something with the debug configuration that slows it down.

But that beam/shield bug is still there... :doubt:

 

Offline Solatar

  • 211
anyone have the old pof specs on hand
How do you specify a decal for a weapon?

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
anyone have the old pof specs on hand
after the explosion ani entry add

$decal:
   +texture:   name_of_texture
   +radius:   the radius of the decal

but if there are more than a few decals on a ship it will slow down dramaticaly
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 

Offline diamondgeezer

anyone have the old pof specs on hand
So... can you limit the number a ship can display at any one time? And is it a case of decals-per-object, or decals-per-square foot (so that a warship can show many more decals than a smaller fighter). Or, again, is it the total number of decals displayed in the game at any one time?

Just curious...

 

Offline Inquisitor

anyone have the old pof specs on hand
Beam bug, eh?

Well, if the decals are indeed optional, lets double check that beam bug.

Goober's earlier release is offical enough for me if we can live with that beam bug...
No signature.

 

Offline Goober5000

  • HLP Loremaster
  • Moderator
  • 214
    • Goober5000 Productions
anyone have the old pof specs on hand
I checked it - under identical missions, several shield quadrants dropped to zero when a beam was fired in fs2_open. :rolleyes: That bug is rather elusive, isn't it?

Perhaps someone could squash that, and then we could have the "official" release.

EDIT: The fix was never committed. :wtf: I'm testing it now.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2002, 11:09:40 am by 561 »

  

Offline Goober5000

  • HLP Loremaster
  • Moderator
  • 214
    • Goober5000 Productions
anyone have the old pof specs on hand
This is very odd.  DTP committed a fast fix a week ago, but CVS never showed me I had to update.

Well, it now works the way Bobboau intended - and it's committed to CVS.  Inquisitor, you may want to check out a fresh module to make sure you have everything up to date, then post the build.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2002, 11:57:12 am by 561 »

 

Offline DTP

  • ImPortant Coder
  • 28
    • http://www.c4-group.dk
anyone have the old pof specs on hand
sry for being late here, but i think that would be some kind of "merge" error perhaps.

I got a logmail here saying i committed it.

indeed strange.
VBB member; reg aug 1999; total posts 600.
War is a lion, on whos back you fall, never to get up.
Think big. Invade Space.

 

Offline Inquisitor

anyone have the old pof specs on hand
Yeah, watch your status window for "C" errors, which indicate conflicts you have to manually correct ;)
No signature.

 

Offline Goober5000

  • HLP Loremaster
  • Moderator
  • 214
    • Goober5000 Productions
anyone have the old pof specs on hand
Well, here's the thing.  When I went looking for that bug, CVS indicated that everything was up-to-date.  Once I fixed it, I tried to commit - and then CVS squawked that I hadn't updated.  I thought that perhaps someone might have committed something during the short time that I was working on the bug, but DTP had committed his thing almost a week earlier.

So I updated, fixed the conflict that popped up, and committed the final result.  It all works now, but I'm rather surprised that CVS didn't show me the update status correctly.