[Stealth]

i heard US is on red alert, since monday i heard.

that's the second highest level, the next level and the US goes to war

anyone heard more about this?

[CP5670]

I thought orange was the second highest? (red is highest)

I don't know why they have this threat level system at all; the common people cannot really do anything about any terrorist attack even if they are informed of it, and it just serves to create unnecessary worrying.

[Ashrak]

theyr at defcon 2 or 3 cuz 1 means OUCH for the planet....

[an0n]

Meh. Old news. They turned on the air defences around New York about an hour ago IIHC.

So they'll be at, what, DEFCON 2?

[Stealth]

yeah orange they were on for a long time, then i THINK monday then went to red, and the next level (defcon) means they ARE going to war

[Ulundel]

Code red should be the highest, yes. But don't know more about it than you Stealth.

[an0n]

Methinks they're trying to bully France and Germany (and the rest of the UN) into backing down and saving face.

[Stealth]

i also heard that they're sending 180,000 soldiers to like some country in the middle east... they're sending them all by civilian airlines, and by the end of the week

[Thorn]

I'm with CP..
I probably couldnt do much to stop an attack, so why worry about it? If something does happen then it would have happened anyway. Nothing you can do. Enjoy what you have while it lasts.

[an0n]

Originally posted by Stealth
i also heard that they're sending 180,000 soldiers to like some country in the middle east... they're sending them all by civilian airlines, and by the end of the week

...........That is quite possibly the single stupidest thing I have ever heard.

They do realise that they've made civillian aircraft a valid target now, don't they?

[Stealth]

i also heard that Korea declared the right to "preemptive" (!?) action (i.e. they can attack a country before the country attacks them... such as attacking the US without any warning or anything)

[Ulundel]

*is very happy that he lives in Estonia*

*again prognosticates the WW3*

[Stealth]

Originally posted by an0n

...........That is quite possibly the single stupidest thing I have ever heard.

They do realise that they've made civillian aircraft a valid target now, don't they?

actually they do that quite often, haven't you heard?  they use that method all over the world, all countries.

why would someone shoot down an aircraft that has the CHANCE of containing a dozen or so soldiers


All the equipment and stuff is still done by military aircraft, but they can't transport 180,000 troops in one week with a few military aircraft, they don't have enough apparently

[an0n]

Originally posted by Stealth
i also heard that Korea declared the right to "preemptive" (!?) action (i.e. they can attack a country before the country attacks them... such as attacking the US without any warning or anything)

I hope to God they do.

If America declare war on North Korea, all public support for the war will evapourate instantly.

[an0n]

Originally posted by Stealth
why would someone shoot down an aircraft that has the CHANCE of containing a dozen or so soldiers

Uh.....to possibly kill a dozen or so soldiers.

[Stealth]

Originally posted by an0n


I hope to God they do.

If America declare war on North Korea, all public support for the war will evapourate instantly.

that's the way i feel too!

as it is enough people (countries particularly) hate the US... and a lot of people in the US are against the war

[Stealth]

Originally posted by an0n
Uh.....to possibly kill a dozen or so soldiers.

no... they wouldn't... it's been done for years, i've heard of countries transporting soldiers by civilian airlines for years now, this isn't the first time they've done it

[an0n]

Originally posted by Stealth
no... they wouldn't... it's been done for years, i've heard of countries transporting soldiers by civilian airlines for years now, this isn't the first time they've done it

.......No. That's "Soldiers taking civillian air-lines to get to their new assignment", not "The army putting troops on civillian aircraft and flying them to the target area".

[kasperl]

ok, i don't want to turn this in another monkey bashing thread, but oh well:

remember this all IMHO, don't take this as an offence, ok?

the way Bush is handling politics lateley, it won't take long before he's fighting at least two fronts, Iraq and Korea. i late;ey heard something about a large poll in the UK, wich stated that most people tought that bush is the biggest danger for world peace. the said that saddam was a madman, but wasn't a danger for worldpeace.

the way i see it, this is gonna happen:

1) the war in Iraq errupts, big mess al over the place, and a lot of civilians dead.
2) after a few days, about a 100 US  troops get killed, and Bush suddenley looses al support.
3) after all this, the EU drops away from bush, blair stays, and looses all support from the UK population
4) korea yell's something, but is ignored
5) heads start to roll in the US, bush goes down in the war scandal, and takes most of is staff and Blair with him.
6) completely ignored in the begiining, the refugees from northern iraq, die in camps in Turkey, they're mostly Kurds (sp?)
7) EU gives support, lot's of tear asking things in EU TV, the US is to bussy with bush going down
8) korea yell's something, but is ignored again
9) about this time, a lot of people got kiled, are being killed, and are going to get killed. use youre imagination for the rest


just my $0,02, don't take this as an offence, ok?





just my humble opinion, don't take this as =an offence, ok?

[an0n]

Originally posted by kasperl
ok, i don't wnat to turn this in another monkey bashing thread, but oh well: