Author Topic: Cockpit ~ Bridge  (Read 2970 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Knight Templar

  • Stealth
  • 212
  • I'm a magic man, I've got magic hands.
Had an Idea, dunno if it's been brought up.

Say I want to put the subsystem "Birdge" on my capship and "cockpit" on my fighter.

Well I was thinking, maybe we could get it to where when subsystem 'Bridge' is destroyed (only on 'big' ships [i.e. it wouldn't work with a bridge on a fighter] ) then the Capship loses 2 levels of AI and when the subsystem 'cockpit' is destroyed on a fighter, its AI goes to none or in the players case, you die.

What say you?
Copyright ©1976, 2003, KT Enterprises. All rights reserved

"I don't want to get laid right now. I want to get drunk."- Mars

Too Long, Didn't Read

 

Offline OldMan

  • 24
    • http://www.lisha.ufsc.br/~tiago
Since in a capital ship the BATTLE bridge (no... they would not be so stupid to use the normal bridge with glass windows during a battle) would be far deep inside the hull, it should not be possible o hit it. It would add a nice possibility to the game the bridge subsystem.. but would be far irrealistic.
If brute force does not solve your problem.... you are not using enough!!!

 

Offline Knight Templar

  • Stealth
  • 212
  • I'm a magic man, I've got magic hands.
Yea, I know, i actually thought of this. We don't know that they have a battle bridge like Star Destroyers or the Enterprise (star trek) but that's why I only suggested two ai levels or maybe even one or something, rather than making it dead.

Also rather than making it dead, killing the bridge would be a blow to command, but it wouldn't completely shut down the ship.
Copyright ©1976, 2003, KT Enterprises. All rights reserved

"I don't want to get laid right now. I want to get drunk."- Mars

Too Long, Didn't Read

 

Offline OldMan

  • 24
    • http://www.lisha.ufsc.br/~tiago
We would have lots of A-Wing ramming at Executor`s bridge style maneuver. Imagine that.. the huge Satanas Class.. nothing can stop it... nothing but a single "head shot" at its bridge... tha would make it so dumb that  he would spend his time shooting at fighters instead of capital ships :)  

It would be far more realistic and effective to target computer systems (supposing it uses a large core likein star treck).  Os better.. life support sub system.. hitting this would be great!
If brute force does not solve your problem.... you are not using enough!!!

 

Offline Knight Templar

  • Stealth
  • 212
  • I'm a magic man, I've got magic hands.
Those are good ides to, but you don't have to have a bridge on it. I wasn't planning on having bridges on shivan ships anyway. You can add the bridge to and where ever you want on the pof.

MY idea was just to have the code be "if [subsytem [cockipit] is destroyed-lower ai to none] [if subsystem [bridge] is destroyed-lowerai by 2] " or something to that affect.
Copyright ©1976, 2003, KT Enterprises. All rights reserved

"I don't want to get laid right now. I want to get drunk."- Mars

Too Long, Didn't Read

  

Offline IceFire

  • GTVI Section 3
  • 212
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ce
I always thought a lifesupport subsystem would be more useful.  Once its gone, the ship's abilities slowly die until its not doing anything at all.
- IceFire
BlackWater Ops, Cold Element
"Burn the land, boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me..."

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
You could always do it manually by measuring the subsystems strength and change-ai-class.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Knight Templar

  • Stealth
  • 212
  • I'm a magic man, I've got magic hands.
yeah, but it would be a ***** to put it on every cap ship for every mission.

even more so with fighters.
Copyright ©1976, 2003, KT Enterprises. All rights reserved

"I don't want to get laid right now. I want to get drunk."- Mars

Too Long, Didn't Read

 
In defense of stupid bridge designs
Galactica has to lower a shield in battle in case a cylon feels the urge to Kamikaze. Also most anime ships (Yamato/Nadesico) also place their command in harms way. Something about leading by example. I really like the idea of a cockpit subsystem cause later on when we get mecha, destroying the cockpit will kill the pilot! Unless the mech is sentient (then you just killed its partner and it's really pissed now! ;)
Don't think of it as being outnumbered. Think of it as having a wide target selection !

ICQ#: 5256653
[email protected]

Projects: Gundam TC, Trek BTFF, REF, and Beyond Redemption
http://photo.starblvd.net/Star_Dragon

 

Offline Nico

  • Venom
    Parlez-vous Model Magician?
  • 212
Quote
Originally posted by IceFire
I always thought a lifesupport subsystem would be more useful.  Once its gone, the ship's abilities slowly die until its not doing anything at all.


not really... destroying life support wouldn't affect the ship much for the battle: it's not like everything vanishes as soon as the systems don't work.
SCREW CANON!

 

Offline Sandwich

  • Got Screen?
  • 213
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Brainzipper
If it's not too complicated to do, I say go for it. It's be great to have for the Star Wars Conversion, if nothing else. :D
SERIOUSLY...! | {The Sandvich Bar} - Rhino-FS2 Tutorial | CapShip Turret Upgrade | The Complete FS2 Ship List | System Background Package

"...The quintessential quality of our age is that of dreams coming true. Just think of it. For centuries we have dreamt of flying; recently we made that come true: we have always hankered for speed; now we have speeds greater than we can stand: we wanted to speak to far parts of the Earth; we can: we wanted to explore the sea bottom; we have: and so  on, and so on: and, too, we wanted the power to smash our enemies utterly; we have it. If we had truly wanted peace, we should have had that as well. But true peace has never been one of the genuine dreams - we have got little further than preaching against war in order to appease our consciences. The truly wishful dreams, the many-minded dreams are now irresistible - they become facts." - 'The Outward Urge' by John Wyndham

"The very essence of tolerance rests on the fact that we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Stretching right back to Kant, through the Frankfurt School and up to today, liberalism means that we can do anything we like as long as we don't hurt others. This means that if we are tolerant of others' intolerance - especially when that intolerance is a call for genocide - then all we are doing is allowing that intolerance to flourish, and allowing the violence that will spring from that intolerance to continue unabated." - Bren Carlill

 

Offline OldMan

  • 24
    • http://www.lisha.ufsc.br/~tiago
So would be necessary to add a new command order to wingmed..  " ram that dammit str destroyer Bridge, Pilot! " And add this maneuver to a-wing AI :)
If brute force does not solve your problem.... you are not using enough!!!

 
Re: In defense of stupid bridge designs
Quote
Originally posted by Star Dragon
Galactica has to lower a shield in battle in case a cylon feels the urge to Kamikaze. Also most anime ships (Yamato/Nadesico) also place their command in harms way. Something about leading by example. I really like the idea of a cockpit subsystem cause later on when we get mecha, destroying the cockpit will kill the pilot! Unless the mech is sentient (then you just killed its partner and it's really pissed now! ;)


sorta like robotech.... one fighter flew into it and BOOM! SHIP EITHER DEAD.........or derelict.

 

Offline Knight Templar

  • Stealth
  • 212
  • I'm a magic man, I've got magic hands.
*ahem*

so SCP guys, is this doable in the next release?
Copyright ©1976, 2003, KT Enterprises. All rights reserved

"I don't want to get laid right now. I want to get drunk."- Mars

Too Long, Didn't Read