Author Topic: From the sketchbook (Read 4984 times)

Turnsky · **on:** April 08, 2003, 06:46:27 am

done during a 'MCSE' grade class (out of sheer bordom mind you)

Fetty · **Reply #1 on:** April 08, 2003, 06:50:21 am

thats what i ment with talented

Stryke 9 · **Reply #2 on:** April 08, 2003, 05:06:37 pm

Her legs, they are bendy and jointless.

Turnsky · **Reply #3 on:** April 08, 2003, 07:24:06 pm

those are PANTS covering the legs...

Stryke 9 · **Reply #4 on:** April 08, 2003, 08:33:11 pm

Yes; I am familiar with the technology, used to use it myself back in my clothes-wearing days.

It's still wrong. Wind resistance (or, in a vaccuum, straight inertia would do) would cause the cloth to press against the leg in such a movement, and thus would conform more or less to its shape- NOT flare outwards ahead of everything else, and certainly not so only towards the end.

Oooh, I love having hard-format art people to kick around.

Nico · **Reply #5 on:** April 09, 2003, 02:20:33 am

maybe the guy/girl is falling backward.

Turnsky · **Reply #6 on:** April 13, 2003, 01:40:11 am

Here's another one, a concept piece for foxfire, i was experimenting with heavy weapons and thier balance on a body etc... (i think i may move the minigun further back along if i do somthing simular in foxfire)...

Stryke 9 · **Reply #7 on:** April 13, 2003, 01:47:33 am

Better. Though I'd like to see the frame ten seconds later- that difficult-to-attain "flying backwards" stance.

Turnsky · **Reply #8 on:** April 13, 2003, 01:52:05 am

I acually made it a smaller caliber than that weapon of the 'old painless' variety... 5.56mm caseless AP round.

Stryke 9 · **Reply #9 on:** April 13, 2003, 01:54:34 am

5.56 at rates of a couple hundred a second is still gonna make you temporarily airborne. After all, that's about 60 pounds of directed force going at you all of a sudden, by my estimate (guess). As opposed to 120, that's pretty good, but it's still roughly the strength of an inexpertly wielded baseball bat.

An expertly would be closer to the 120, and you wouldn't likely be getting back up in a hurry.

Maybe you should work that into the story or summat.

Turnsky · **Reply #10 on:** April 13, 2003, 04:41:41 am

i'll think about it.... the design of the gun itself certainly makes it lightweight.. as well as the ammo it should hold

... as it is of low caliber.. but will go through it like nothing else...

Nico · **Reply #11 on:** April 13, 2003, 04:55:31 am

bah, if you really want a minigun, make up some **** like me, and get a rail or gauss minigun

Turnsky · **Reply #12 on:** April 13, 2003, 05:17:28 am

yeah, but it doesn't fit in to the timeline for foxfire.... too advanced

Turnsky · **Reply #13 on:** April 17, 2003, 08:39:38 pm

here's another one, slightly more mundane though, but i'm thinking of photoshopping it... (after i finish with this foxfire eps...)

Nuclear1 · **Reply #14 on:** April 17, 2003, 08:59:17 pm

Artistic genius, as usual

Stryke 9 · **Reply #15 on:** April 17, 2003, 09:40:23 pm

[starts muttering something that rhymes with "blurry corn"

Turnsky · **Reply #16 on:** April 17, 2003, 09:42:25 pm

*mutters something about ripping Stryke9's arms off and beating him to death with them*

Stryke 9 · **Reply #17 on:** April 17, 2003, 09:44:15 pm

Hey, I'm not your S&M sex toy, sicko. Go find a sheep.

Sheepy · **Reply #18 on:** April 17, 2003, 09:51:29 pm

...you called ..... agh crap not again

Knight Templar · **Reply #19 on:** April 17, 2003, 11:45:45 pm

mmmmmm fox titi-- ... err.. yey

News:

Author Topic: From the sketchbook (Read 4984 times)

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook

From the sketchbook