Originally posted by CP5670
That might have made sense if I could figure out what in the world his main point was; he just ranted incoherently about any random topic and the piece as whole did not hold together at all.
No...it seemed pretty coherent to me. A rant....and one that I do not agree with at all but I do give the guy credit for being coherent and at least having a point to make.
Just because we aren't a bunch of fanatical lunatics (i'm a moderated lunatic thank you!) running around chopping peoples heads off and being bold of every minute of every day doesn't mean thats a bad thing (skulls in the stree is not what I'd call making architecture more interesting).

, he's highlighted some of the "better" things that we do. No, we haven't got the tolerance thing down properly...but at least there's a bit of air of caution before running rampant over someone elses culture because it isn't ours.
Suggesting that we go beyond extreme is ludicrous. A balanced, considered, and reasoned approach is more preferable than jumping over the cliff first and asking if it were a good idea later.
Sorry, not like minded at all. But once again, I give credit where credit is due. This was definately something well written as well as ranted.