Author Topic: 2003, year of movie sequels?  (Read 6599 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stryke 9

  • Village Person
    Reset count: 4
  • 211
2003, year of movie sequels?
Matrix I'm fervently hoping doesn't suck so bad as the trailers make out. If it does, it'll suck so much my entire town's gonna be destroyed by the smallish black hole of suckage that will be generated the first time it's played in the local theater.

Terminator 2? You kidding me? You don't think the Terminator series falls under the "cheesy action/horror movie" genre? Along with Aliens?

Star Wars was actually the exception I was thinking of when I wrote that. There are damn few others.

 

Offline Stunaep

  • Thread Necrotech.... we bring the dead to life!
  • 210
2003, year of movie sequels?
Quote
Originally posted by diamondgeezer

Terminator 2,

The original had Arnold Spell-o-negger as the chief character. I think that classifies as camp/cheesy
"Post-counts are like digital penises. That's why I don't like Shrike playing with mine." - an0n
Bah. You're an admin, you've had practice at this spanking business. - Odyssey

 

Offline diamondgeezer

2003, year of movie sequels?
Quote
Originally posted by Stryke 9
Terminator 2? You kidding me? You don't think the Terminator series falls under the "cheesy action/horror movie" genre? Along with Aliens?

T2 and Aliens always get five stars when they're shown on TV. They're hailed as two of the very best action films ever. I've never heard them called 'cheesy' before.

 

Offline Stryke 9

  • Village Person
    Reset count: 4
  • 211
2003, year of movie sequels?
Uh-huh. They're veritable Schindler's Lists, all right. Plenty of plot and background in there.


Dude, it doesn't have to be a movie hated on by the critics to be a cheesy movie. Pretty much every action movie is one. It's not a ratings thing, it's a movie type- some of the best movies ever made were cheesy as hell. If not most of them- movies are pretty bad at having points.

 

Offline diamondgeezer

2003, year of movie sequels?
Quote
Originally posted by Stryke 9
Uh-huh. They're veritable Schindler's Lists, all right. Plenty of plot and background in there.

Look out folks, he's armed with sarcasm.

Sorry to dissapoint you, but I don't go to a film for its moving story or subtle plot. I like to see space ships and dudes with guns zapping alien beasties or robots, or robots zapping aliens, or any other combination thereof. I like sci-fi action films and not a lot else - I rarely watch a comedy or drama unless someone makes me. If I put a film on because I want to watch it, it'll be space ships and guns, believe me :nod:

Quote
If not most of them- movies are pretty bad at having points. [/B]

:wtf: I know those words, but that made no sense...

 
2003, year of movie sequels?
Its worth noting that Tolkien never wanted LotR published in three volumes. He felt it should be one book but he had to concede the point to get it published.

On a related note I wanna see The Ring 2. I just saw the first one yesterday and I wanna see more of that creepy ass kid. Muhahaha. Crap movie really although the end was better than I thought it was going to be. Everyone told me it was scary. Bollocks. In the scary stakes that kid aint fit to tie Damien Thorne's shoes.

 

Offline diamondgeezer

2003, year of movie sequels?
Watch the japanese ones. In middle of the night.

 

Offline Stunaep

  • Thread Necrotech.... we bring the dead to life!
  • 210
2003, year of movie sequels?
Quote
Originally posted by diamondgeezer

Look out folks, he's armed with sarcasm.

Sorry to dissapoint you, but I don't go to a film for its moving story or subtle plot. I like to see space ships and dudes with guns zapping alien beasties or robots, or robots zapping aliens, or any other combination thereof. I like sci-fi action films and not a lot else - I rarely watch a comedy or drama unless someone makes me. If I put a film on because I want to watch it, it'll be space ships and guns, believe me :nod:

If that extends to books, then I'm not surprised why you haven't read "All quiet on the western front" :doubt:
"Post-counts are like digital penises. That's why I don't like Shrike playing with mine." - an0n
Bah. You're an admin, you've had practice at this spanking business. - Odyssey

 

Offline kode

  • The Swedish Chef
  • 28
  • The Swede
    • http://theswe.de
2003, year of movie sequels?
Quote
Originally posted by Stunaep

would you prefer the animated version?


of course. All hail Ralph Bakshi.
anyone seen his "Wizards" by the way? It makes the animated LotR seem sane.
Pray, v. To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf of a single petitioner confessedly unworthy.
- Ambrose Bierce
<Redfang> You're almost like Stryke 9 or an0n
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."
- Aldous Huxley
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

 

Offline diamondgeezer

2003, year of movie sequels?
Quote
Originally posted by Stunaep
If that extends to books, then I'm not surprised why you haven't read "All quiet on the western front" :doubt:

Nah, books I'm more an S&F kind of guy. Tolkien and Pratchett mainly, though these days I don't read as much as I'd like to.

Thing was, at school we got 'classics' like Lord of the Flies and Mice and Men forced on us. Drove me nuts, especially since I'd always read the bloody thing four times by the time the rest of the class had gotten thorugh 'em. So now I tend to stick with the fantasy and sci-fi stuff. Now Fade-Out, there's a good read :nod:

And, to be honest, there was no need to drag your argument out of one thread in to another, was there?
« Last Edit: April 21, 2003, 03:16:39 pm by 170 »

 

Offline Stryke 9

  • Village Person
    Reset count: 4
  • 211
2003, year of movie sequels?
Stu: Spaceships and robots in "All Quiet"? Maybe I read the wrong version...:D

 

Offline diamondgeezer

2003, year of movie sequels?
Er... he was suggesting I hadn't read it

 

Offline Stryke 9

  • Village Person
    Reset count: 4
  • 211
2003, year of movie sequels?
I'm aware of that.

Not everything is about you, grasshopper.

 

Offline diamondgeezer

2003, year of movie sequels?
Granted, but it looks to me like you made a mistake... or just a point to subtle for me to grasp.

  

Offline J.F.K.

  • 29
2003, year of movie sequels?
Quote
Originally posted by Visionism
Its worth noting that Tolkien never wanted LotR published in three volumes. He felt it should be one book but he had to concede the point to get it published.


Actually, that's half true. The publisher's pre-teen son, who Tolkien asked to be his critic, suggested they split it into 3. Tolkien took the suggestion.
.
[font="SerpentineDBol"]. . . . W H O . I S . T H E . M A N , . W H O . I S . T H E . M Y T H ?[/font]

 
2003, year of movie sequels?
Behold the power of Stanley Unwin. The point remains though that they chose to split the first two books at a rather odd point. The place they split the movies makes more sense.

 

Offline TheCelestialOne

  • Man of Exceptional Taste
  • 28
Re: 2003, year of movie sequels?
Quote
Originally posted by J.F.K.
Shanghai Knights (I love Jackie Chan :D)


Yeah, but Owen Wilson
"I also like to stomp my enemies, incite rebellions, start the occasional war, and spend lazy hours preening my battle aura."

~Supporter of the The Babylon Project~

Like Babylon 5? Like Star Trek? Like science fiction? Go HERE

 

Offline Nico

  • Venom
    Parlez-vous Model Magician?
  • 212
2003, year of movie sequels?
Quote
Originally posted by karajorma
By that logic the two extra matix movies aren`t really sequels either cause it was always planned as a trilogy too.


that's bollocks :doubt:
They didn't even expect the first one to be that successfull.
SCREW CANON!

 

Offline Stealth

  • Braiiins...
  • 211
2003, year of movie sequels?
Quote
Originally posted by Razor
I also heard that there is Jackass the movie :shaking:, coming to cinemas here in a few weeks.


really?  Jackass left theaters months ago.  came out on DVD a few weeks ago

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
2003, year of movie sequels?
Quote
Originally posted by venom2506


that's bollocks :doubt:
They didn't even expect the first one to be that successfull.


They didn`t expect it to be as successful as it turned out to be but apparently the stuff in Zion that will be in the second movie was supposed to be in the first but would have made the movie too long.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]