Author Topic: Dx9  (Read 4311 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
will it ever get used?
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline Taristin

  • Snipes
  • 213
  • BlueScalie
    • Skelkwank Shipyards
8

We're using DX8... not 9!!! But since 9 supports 8, you'll be ok.
Freelance Modeler | Amateur Artist

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
if there was a good reason, we might upgrade but it seems as though there realy wasn't anything important added so, we'll just stick with 8
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 

Offline IceFire

  • GTVI Section 3
  • 212
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ce
DX9 mostly just addds support for programmable pixel shaders.  Something we can't even do.  DX9 was a modest upgrade from 8...its not worth the upgrade at this point.
- IceFire
BlackWater Ops, Cold Element
"Burn the land, boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me..."

 

Offline Fry_Day

  • 28
Actually, DirectX 9 was the first DirectX with true programmability. PS2.0 is the first decent pixel shader that actually lets you do stuff without using texture lookup for everything, and there's definitions for PS2.x and VS2.x (which stand for version 2 extended, if you wonder), and the definitions for VS3.0 and PS3.0, which means there will be at least three more generations of graphics hardware that will do only DirectX 9. Of course, after VS and PS 3.0 are implemented on every platform, and blending operations are made available for floating-point framebuffers, all that's needed is just to wait for everyone to get VS/PS3.0 hardware, 'cause that has everything - dynamic branching, booleans, texture lookups at the vertex shader, and whatnot.
Basically, that level of hardware could have a compiler that can compile any Renderman script for it (Renderman is a language used for shaders in some commercial 3d graphics programs), even if it may be multi-pass.

What I meant to say is, that while FS2 uses DirectX 8, DirectX 9 IS a significant upgrade, even if there don't seem to be any "new" features, like the original introduction of shaders in DirectX 8, or Fixed-Function TnL in DirectX 7.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2003, 09:00:01 pm by 791 »

 

Offline Starks

  • 29
You never know... Maybe when fs2_open 4.0 comes along, they'll update it to 9.0...
Formerly of the Dark Wings and Legion of Apocalypse

 

Offline diamondgeezer

Narol keeps trying to convince me that DX9 would be faster than 8. But then he has a TNT2 so his opinions are less valid than mine :nervous::D

 

Offline RandomTiger

  • Senior Member
  • 211
It looks like it wouldnt be as much work to take D3D8 to D3D9 as it was to take D3D5 to D3D8 but..

DX9 could well be slower than DX8
DX9 is not officially compatible with w95
It would throw open a whole new series of compatibility problems and bugs just when fs2_open is getting stable.
How long can the rest of the DX code stay static while D3D races on without causing some kind of problem?

I will hopefully have something to say on this topic in a few weeks.

 
The version of DirectX the SCP uses isnt compatable with win95 either.

 

Offline RandomTiger

  • Senior Member
  • 211
No? Is that official for 8.1 or is that a bug.
Please e-mail me.

If that is the case then no one complained and its not an issue

 
The Windows 95 compability issue was just briefly discused when deep_eyes released the his first readme draft. Never heard more about it.

Ive stated in the readme that fs2_open wont work with windows 95 and nobody has corrected me, so I asumed this was correct.

Would be nice to clear this up.
When will I learn?  The answer to life's problems aren't at the bottom of a bottle, they're on TV! -- Homer,  "There's No Disgrace Like Home''
I sometimes find myself here on this forum, late at night constantly pressing "Reload" over and over again

 

Offline RandomTiger

  • Senior Member
  • 211
Quote
Originally posted by bottomfan
Would be nice to clear this up.


Yes. Would be good to know if its because of DX8.
If it is perhaps it could run under OGL instead.

Anyone with win95 want to speak up?

 
Ive got win95, but is on a very old and slow machine(133mhz). I sorry to say ive havent got the time nor thr energy to install FS2(thou it is rather heavy).

DirectX 8 works on Windows 95, or so they say:
System Requirements
* Supported Operating Systems: Windows ME
* This download applies to customers running Microsoft Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows Me.
* The DirectX installation process requires approximately 50 megabytes (MB) of free space on your hard drive.
   After installation, the DirectX download takes approximately 15 MB of hard drive space. If you have an earlier version of DirectX installed on your system you will see little difference in used space on your hard drive following installation of DirectX 8.0.
    * DirectX 8.0 will overwrite the earlier versions.

Anyone with a blank partition willing to try it out? :)
When will I learn?  The answer to life's problems aren't at the bottom of a bottle, they're on TV! -- Homer,  "There's No Disgrace Like Home''
I sometimes find myself here on this forum, late at night constantly pressing "Reload" over and over again

 

Offline RandomTiger

  • Senior Member
  • 211
I might be able to manage it at some point with my space machine.

 

Offline Carl

  • Render artist
  • 211
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/
you can run fs_open with DX9 though, right?
"Gunnery control, fry that ****er!" - nuclear1

 
Quote
Originally posted by Carl
you can run fs_open with DX9 though, right?


Ive tested FS2_open with all released versions of DX9( dident plan to, It just happend that way) and all of them work.
When will I learn?  The answer to life's problems aren't at the bottom of a bottle, they're on TV! -- Homer,  "There's No Disgrace Like Home''
I sometimes find myself here on this forum, late at night constantly pressing "Reload" over and over again

 
Quote
Originally posted by RandomTiger


Yes. Would be good to know if its because of DX8.
If it is perhaps it could run under OGL instead.

Anyone with win95 want to speak up?


Yes, i do. DX8 works with win95, however the SCP wsnts 8.1, which does not work with win95. I did have win 95 until the start of this year and I have pointed this out before (though due to e-mail problems it prob wasnt noticed).

 

Offline RandomTiger

  • Senior Member
  • 211

 

Offline Inquisitor

I think SCP will stick with dx8 for the foreseeable future.

You need the new .NET dev environment for dx9, and I see no reason to buy that just for this :)

SCP will run with DX9 runtimes.

And, I am sorry your still on Win95 :(
No signature.

 
no, i was on win95, I'm now on XP. ooooo pretty colours!!:D