[Woomeister]

Originally posted by Goober5000
EDIT: So you're scrapping the mission with the Het-Ka, as well as the ship itself.  Are you getting rid of the entire Het-Ka subplot?  If so, can you tell us the original plans for it?

Yes we are.

The Het-Ka subplot leads into the original plan for INF2. Later you find out they where more than just a bunch of rogue Vasudans.

[phreak]

ok we scrapped the vasudan subplot? kinda news to me

That makes the SOC mission i did slightly obsolete.  You can put that in the archives if you want

[Goober5000]

Originally posted by Woomeister
The Het-Ka subplot leads into the original plan for INF2. Later you find out they where more than just a bunch of rogue Vasudans.

So they would be...?

No harm in telling us the original plot if it's no longer being used, is there?

[neo_hermes]

meep...

[Triple Ace]

Finish soon, I'm bored.

[DeepSpace9er]

Are you hoping to have this out by, say, March? February? or in July like R1?

[Woomeister]

I want R2 or maybe even 3 by July.

[Woomeister]

I ripped apart the new MkII and made a new MkI from it. Haven't converted it yet.

[Woolie Wool]

I don't like it.

[Knight Templar]

First one:

Second one:

Third one:

[Trivial Psychic]

I just thought I'd mention this in this thread:

A few weeks ago, a new telescope recently orbited by NASA returned some of its first infrared images, and one shot was of Formalhaut (sp?), which is the newly discovered system the other side of Ross 128 for the Inferno campaign (R1 as it stands right now, if not for R2).  Those images show that Formalhaut is a star with a planetary formation disk around it.  I'm not sure if you had any plans for or have completed any missions for Formalhaut for R2 (R1+R2), but if you haven't, would you plan on including this newly discovered data, by possibly having Formalhaut as a nebulous and asteroid-filled region?  The images also suggest the presence of a planet, but considering what the visual range is in an FS nebula, even using the planet pof would be useless unless you are effectively right on top of the planet, which would be dangerous (as far as the mission goes) and require extremely detailed textures (at least in one section).  Perhaps having some larger, hi-poly asteroids created that are more cap-ship sized would be a cool feature... possibly for even some SW:ESB style persuit!

Later!

[SadisticSid]

All three look pretty good! Doesn't really fit the EA 'look' though, however, they're definite improvements on the originals.

[Woomeister]

Gets rid of a lot of maps too

[Corsair114]

Claymore 1&3 are beauties in that pic, Woo. Not too sure about that remade Mk. II, though. The engine/weapon pods seem too far from the main fuselage. Perhaps if you made them each gulll wings(the top pair wings come up a bit then come back down at an angle, and vice-versa for the lower pair of wings).

[Woomeister]

The guns aren't on those pods, so no more modifications to it should be needed.

[Setekh]

Those Claymore remakes are fine, Woomeister. Love it.

[Woolie Wool]

The first of your modified Claymores (the one with two wings) is the only good one, but the delta-shaped winglike projections ahead of the main wings need to be shrunk considerably. The other new Claymores look horrible.

[Woomeister]

Originally posted by Woolie Wool
The other new Claymores look horrible.

Why?

[Goober5000]

I don't really like them either.  I'm not sure why, but I think they look kind of crumpled.  I prefer the crisp look of the originals.

[Woolie Wool]

Originally posted by Woomeister

Why?

Just look at them! They're weird and ugly and nothing like a FreeSpace fighter. I miss the old ones.