[Rampage]

Here, these are funny cartoons of the Gore Endorsement of Dean.

God Bless the Republican Party!













Cheers!

Rampage

[aldo_14]

I don't get it.  Guess I'm not suppossed to, though.

Is that suppossed to be kilt in the first one?  If so - why?

[01010]

I really don't know what to say. So I won't.

[IceFire]

Those are quite good!  I get them and I'm not even American

[mikhael]

Originally posted by aldo_14
I don't get it.  Guess I'm not suppossed to, though.

Is that suppossed to be kilt in the first one?  If so - why?

ITs a schoolgirl showing a doctor her doll, Aldo.


Overall, I'd have to say that none of them are terribly funny. Of course, I don't care who Gore endorses. I'll vote for Vadar_1 before I vote for Bush.

[Stryke 9]

Uh... let's see, accusing Dean of "anger" because he's not fellating Bush enthusiastically while Bush methodically ****s over everyone not himself and his cronies as he's been doing since the last election, complaining about Lieberman's "betrayal" even though he's a **** and there's really no reason for Republicans to give a damn except that everyone knows nobody'd vote for a **** like Lieberman, and a reference to a scene from the last election better left forgotten for our wounded collective psyche.

If this is the funniest Republicans can get, I gotta say, it's no wonder you lot get so much joy out of slaughtering foreigners and starving the poor. 'S all you've got. When the opposition party manages to be harsher, and infinitely funnier, towards its own candidates than you can summon up you're in trouble.

[Liberator]

Those are good.

Explain this to me:  Just because GW won't fall on his knees before the EU(particularly the French and the Germans(how quickly we forget?)) and all of a sudden he's a ####up?  

GW is acting like what he is, the leader of the most powerful nation on Earth and leading by example.  

Is it going to take a nuke in Paris or Berlin to get you guys to realize that this is a them or us war?

[Stryke 9]

Uhm... how about managing to raise taxes while at the same time killing social services? How about planning a better health care and education system for the occupied Iraqis than was ever in place here while slashing education and health care budgets to basically nothing? How about bringing the economy down to depression levels?

How about declaring a wholly unnecessary war grounded on blatant and insulting lies, then pretending those lies never existed? How about exposing a CIA operative as revenge when her husband pointed out that they were, in fact, lies?

How about setting up the first concentration camps since WWII, denying all who fall under the incredibly vague term "suspected terrorists" of any form of judicial rights at all, installing oppressive near-Orwellian security measures including wiretapping and suspension of fifth-Amendment rights to harass the populace while simultaneously torpedoing national security as a whole?


How about rejecting nearly all of our international alliances, establishing the US as a de facto imperialist nation, thus exposing it to far more terrorist attacks, killing our soldiers on a daily basis for no real reason he has satisfactorially explained, bogging us down in a situation that is, as predicted, very nearly as bad as Vietnam was and certain to get much worse should he continue, rejecting every single environmental protection we ever put in place on the failed pretext that they were bad for industry, and then turning around and demanding every other nation back him up in all his actions again?

What, exactly, has he done right, aside from giving Halliburton and the lot millions of dollars of our tax money, and breaking down the separation between church and state? Everything he's done out of any motivation other than sheer greed and hate has been a total failure- education's a mess, the cities are a mess, infrastructure's a mess, the new Department's a mess, and this from a President who was supposed to be all about education and national security.

Hell, he sucks so bad he's basing a large part of his campaign on hating gays. We haven't had a president this horrible almost in the entire history of the United States. Nixon was far and away better than this.

[Bobboau]

and the fact that nobody else stands a chance of beating him is almost funny

[mikhael]

Bob, I think the word you're looking for is "pathetic", not "funny".

Its pathetic how easy it is to tell lies and make the populace at large believe them. Look at the way the guy's original presidential campaign: he took credit for introducing an education bill in Texas. Just two tiny little problems. It wasn't his bill, and as governor, he vetoed the bill. Examine his anti-terrorism record BEFORE Sept11.  The Bush administration, at Bush's urging, tore down almost the entire apparatus the Clinton administration had put in place for combatting terrorism. It was a "waste of taxpayer money". Post Sept11, Bush brought back a Clinton administration plan to create the Office of Homeland Security--and then he claimed credit for creating it after originally preventing its creation (a pattern, I think).

And yet, somehow, this is the guy we're going to be stuck with for another four years? I promise, if he gets elected (or re-appointed, really), I will leave the country before the inauguration.

[Bobboau]

I'd vote for Lieberman, he is the only democrat that I think has a snowballs chance, but he won't be given the shot

[Stryke 9]

He's very nearly as bad, anyway.

[Ace]

"GW is acting like what he is, the leader of the most powerful nation on Earth and leading by example."

If he's an example for how the whole world should act then the creationists are right. There is no evolution, but devolution!

Good thing I get to vote the son of a ***** out of office

[Goober5000]

The Rockwell painting...


I'll refrain from commenting on the rest of the thread.

[karajorma]

Originally posted by Liberator
Explain this to me:  Just because GW won't fall on his knees before the EU(particularly the French and the Germans(how quickly we forget?)) and all of a sudden he's a ####up?  

GW is acting like what he is, the leader of the most powerful nation on Earth and leading by example.  

Is it going to take a nuke in Paris or Berlin to get you guys to realize that this is a them or us war?

Sounds like the brainwashing really worked here. Since when has America been at war with France or Germany? In fact WHEN has the US ever been at war with France?

All France and Germany have done is excercise there democratic right to say no. But then Bush has never believed in democracy.

[Bobboau]

I think he meant that they arn't takeing the threat seriusly and that it will take a Al Qeda nuke in Paris to get them to pay atention.

and while Gemany did little more than express there extreem dissatisfaction at our actions (I'm cool with that), France was activly working aganst us (I don't eat yoplait any more)

[Blaise Russel]

I'd like to say this reminds me why I hate parties in democracy, but I can't say I've ever forgotten.

Tribalism is so much fun. Wait, no, it isn't.

[Stryke 9]

Um, France and Germany had no problem when we went bin Laden huntin'. They were behind us 100%, as were all sane nations. They drew the line at the baseless attack on Iraq, which had nothing to do with terrorism or indeed anything else of that nature.

I mean, come on. All of our major evidence was known to be a fraud in Europe only a coupla months after the whole movement got rolling. It'd be hard to say anyone in Europe did the US in an offense in any way, while we've acted nothing but disgustingly from the start (demanding that France turn over the bodies of US soldiers buried overseas, striking the name "French" from anything in the Congressional cafeterias, the huge number of insults we've officially leveled at both countries, banning companies from said countries from the "reconstruction" in Iraq on the grounds that they'd "compromise security"? If this were grade school like Bush seems to think it is the US'd be getting its ass kicked by everyone by now).

[Bobboau]

'compromise security'?
I thought we flat out said it was becase they were opposed to us going in in the first place, and still are.

[Stryke 9]

No, that'd be a different story. That'd be Bush being flat-out vindictive, this is more a "we think you're potential terrorists" sorta thing.

Also, it just struck me... isn't the portrayal of Sharpton in the second one down just a tad racist? As in, quite a bit? I guess it could be a really obscure quote, but I've never heard him sing James Brown or anything of the sort.