[an0n]

HAW HAW

[deep_eyes]

yay another reason to not vote for bush in 04!

VIVALA CLARK!

[Beowulf]

Originally posted by deep_eyes
yay another reason to not vote for bush in 04!

VIVALA CLARK!

Ohh, you mean the guy that gave the go ahead for the Waco, TX massacre? Ohh, you didn't know that, did you?

[an0n]

Bush is gonna walk the election, but lets not have this turn into a politics thread. I want it to be a 'damn all that American propaganda' thread.

[mikhael]

I'm a skeptic.

Is there any corroboration for this anywhere but this one article?

[Baron MacDoblin]

As long as we got him in the end, I don't care if he was captured by the Duchy of Bum-Fuqq.

[Solatar]

Originally posted by an0n
Bush is gonna walk the election, but lets not have this turn into a politics thread. I want it to be a 'damn all that American propaganda' thread.

Damn all that mother****ing American propaganda!


I'm American BTW... It's a shame to see what people I know have come to believe just because the media said it.

[Knight Templar]

err.. that doesn't mean Americans didn't capture him.. it just implies that they didn't capture him first.

[an0n]

The Kurds caught him, got the Americans to agree to some land-deals, then let them 'seize the evil tyrant'.

Who's betting that in 5-6 years those very same Kurds will be invading Iran with American weapons?

[Bobboau]

yes, damn that.. uh, American?... propaganda!

if this gets any coroboration or shows even the slightest chance of beeing true, this just might slay Bush's re-election plans, but for that reason I don't see why Bush would have been so stupid as to try this stunt, he would have gotten nearly identical boost no mater how he was captured, but lieing about it would almost asureidly get out before the election, so I don't see why he'd risk it. this seems like that 'find the boeing' thing that claims that the plane hitting the pentegon on 9-11 was faked, it seems like too much of a political risk to fake somethinging in a manner that wouldn't make a diference in the end result.

but then again, Bush is a moron, so I supose it's posable, and if it is I just hope we can get one of the better contenders (like Lieberman or McCain) to replace him, but that seems unlikely

you know I think the story of him being captured by his own people as a result of his (son's) brutality makes for a better story, than us just finding him and him surendering. so this just doen't make any sence

[edit]hey, when did our terror alert placebo thingy go up?[/edit]

[Beowulf]

Originally posted by Bobboau
...but then again, Bush is a moron...

This will be my last post on this thread I promise....

But if Bush is such a moron, how come he has managed to so completely hasten the death of the Democrat Party? He has carefully taken away all issues accept for the issue of himself.

We all know it's dying. And for good cause, the Republicans are hardly any different! Time now for the Constitutionalists to fill the void!

[Bobboau]

just becase the democrats are complete ****ing brain dead tards doesn't make Bush a genius.
the dems dug there own hole

[an0n]

The Kurd-capture thing appears to be somewhat breaking news. Musta started when then Iraqi papers went out (which, seen as the UK papers are being run and delivered now, should be the same as whatever their GMT off-set is).

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/12/21/1071941612613.html

http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,8231507%255E954,00.html

[karajorma]

Originally posted by an0n
Who's betting that in 5-6 years those very same Kurds will be invading Iran with American weapons?

Arming the Kurds would be the most stupid move possible. They wouldn't attack Iran. If they attacked anyone it would be Turkey who is already a member of NATO and will shortly be a member of the EU.

By NATO treaty any attack on a NATO nation is considered an attack on them all (with the possible exception of France) so the whole of NATO would then have to go in and fight the Kurds.

Just cause it's stupid doesn't mean Bush won't do it. I just wanted it on record that I detected the stupidity

[aldo_14]

The source is quoted as the Sunday Express, though - which quadruples the chances of it being made up bollocks.  

Even if it seems to make sense...... if it's in the Express, it's most likely made up.

[diamondgeezer]

That was my first thought - it's the Express. Not even tramps will pick up an Express if they find it lying in a park.

[aldo_14]

If you put fish & chips in an Express, they taste worse.

[diamondgeezer]

True dat

[aldo_14]

It's not fit for wiping your arse on, that paper.  I could probably launch a page long tirade about how it embodies the worst of humanity and deserves a cruiser missile, but that'd require me actually looking at the thing.  And that'd likely cause me to vomit.

Oh, and on the subject of newspapers in general - Piers Morgan = dickhead.

[Taristin]

Originally posted by karajorma


By NATO treaty any attack on a NATO nation is considered an attack on them all (with the possible exception of France) so the whole of NATO would then have to go in and fight the Kurds.

I don't know why I find this line especially funny...