[Corsair mk. 2]

And let us have a moment of silence in memory of Alpha 1.

[an0n]

I think beyond all human levels of comprehension.

Notice that I said 'beyond' and neither 'above' nor 'below'.

[Bri_Dog]

I'm not racist, I hate everybody

[an0n]

I'm racist. I hate everybody.


A/S/L??!?!1111

[Corsair mk. 2]

Well... as long as you treat everyone the same....
Heh. Reminds me of Remember the Titans...
"Now I may be a mean cuss but I am the SAME mean cuss to everyone on this team." - Coach Boone

[magatsu1]

Full Metal Jacket:

"Here, you are all equally worthless"

[Mr. Vega]

No, Athens won. Don't believe me? Take a look at the white house. Hell, Sparta is so famous because Athens was defeated by them.

And the compassion tribe would have a much higher quality of life with the technology and stuff. These things will be wanted by the hate tribes. It doesn't matter who rules, cultures are the only things that can truly conquer.

[diamondgeezer]

Which is why America dominates the globe today. Not cos of their stealth bombers and wepaon satellites but because their culture is appeals to most people on the world. Even Saddam enjoyed American TV and whatnot. It's exactly what happened with Rome

[Whitelight]

Well you never hear of someone killing another because they love them, except maybe pull the plug because the person has no brain acitivity which is why love shouldn`t even be in this topic..
If a person says they killed them out of love, well then they are not balanced but mentally sick or mentally unstable...

[vyper]

Love is as dangerous as it is wonderful.

[Bobboau]

I never said the love tribe was doevoide of hate, when it comes to each other they are both equaly vitriolic and violent

[an0n]

That's impossible.

By having love and compassion they'd be weaker and less likely to fight.

All that matters is how much your intelligence can enhance your sense of self-preservation.

[Pez]

Originally posted by Windrunner


you said it mag.

here in sweden the racisim is  not so big problem beacuse we don't have many colored humans. but the nacisim is a growing problem in whole scandinavia.

I must say that I disagree on both your statements. I say that we have a problem with racism here today. In Sweden about 1 million are first or secondgeneration immigrants. The swedish integration of immigrants have pretty much been a big failure (as in most western countries). Most immigrants live in suburbs to Stockholm or any of the other big cities. They have harder to get a job than the average swede. And we gonna need more immigrants in the future. In about ten years a whole generation of postwar persons will retire.

The problem with racism in Sweden today is not that people dismiss a whole race or a whole nation of people. The problem is the growing "everyday-racism" (svenska: vardagsrasism) which means that though a person who not is a racist still can have some hostile thoughts of immigrants (which makes one more of a xenophobe than a racist).

So the biggest problem we stand before is how the immigrants can adapt to a life in Sweden and how the citizens will deal with the newswedes.

About the growing problem of nazis in scandinavia is atleast for me a minor problem (if you compare to the racism and integrationproblem above). There are about 3000 active nazis today in Sweden and probably about 20000 more who support them but are not active. I agree that it's a problem but as any other politcalgroups they have the right to express their political thoughts. I see the extremeleft as equally big problem as the nazis but the difference between the two groups is that the extremeleft have more people who support them.

[Pez]

I don't know how it's in other countries but in Sweden a racistinsult is worse than an insult on for example a fatguy. If I call a black guy "you black motherf****r" I would get a more severe punishment that if a black guy would call me "you white motherf****r", that's because the blacks are a minority group. Doublestandards? Yes!

[an0n]

Who gives a ****?

Sooner or later something will come along, be it a race-war, a virus or just genetic degredation that'll wipe out the weaker sub-species. Then there'll be no more hypocrisy and I'll finally get some peace from all these grea-sy thugs.

[aldo_14]

Majority power requires protection of minorities.... i.e. the minority is more vunerable because of it's reduced numbers & influence, and thus extra measure are required.

Fat people, dumb people, etc, don't get attacked in the street or have their houses firebombed.  Sadly, ethnic minorities often do.

Incidentally, love is a necessarry part to keep the human species alive.  Firstly, it's important for stimulating reproduction.  Secondly, it's required to ensure parents take care of their offspring - a human child is too weak to care for itself for the first - probably - 7 or 8 years or even longer.  Hatred is negative for humanity, because it destroys the group dynamic required to survive... whilst it may guarantee a degree of short-term survival, eventually it would destroy the species.  Humans are simply unable to survive in true isolation.

[an0n]

No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. Catergorically: No.

Kids as young as 1, left to fend for themselves in decaying urban areas have been known to survive. The adapt.

Sure, they can't talk and ****, but they survive.

And as for parental love, the children would be cared for as once they reach maturity they would become a possible source of a mutual-defence kinda deal. And if not that, then the child would become the defender of the parent upon realising that it could benefit from the knowledge of the parent. So it becomes the muscle behind the parents brains. There's no love, just a lust for more abilities which could aid its own survival.

Lately (universally speaking) this has been perverted somewhat by the 'need' that people have to bestow their knowledge on their children so that they will, in some way, live on after death.

And as for the 'isolation' thing, just because you lack love doesn't mean you're doomed to isolation.

People cluster together for protection. They group together under an unspoken deal saying "I'll defend you if you defend me". And this was extended to things like trust and honour, which are fairly good qualities if they're applied properly. But then trust and honour were combined and perverted to form love. Which can be summed up in one sentence: "No greater love hath a man, than that he would lay down his life for his brother".

See, so love destroys.

All it does is serve to make you place the survival of others above your own. Which, by anyones standards, is ****ing stupid.

[magatsu1]

Originally posted by diamondgeezer
[BWhich is why America dominates the globe today. Not cos of their stealth bombers and wepaon satellites but because their culture is appeals to most people on the world. Even Saddam enjoyed American TV and whatnot. It's exactly what happened with Rome[/B]

Freedom appeals to people. American culture is another thing.
I think America dominates 'cos freedom is a natural instinct and
Communisim/USSR collapsed.

Hell, even China is becoming more Capitalist.

[an0n]

Like I've been saying for years. No man can have power unless it is given to him freely by the people.

Yes, I am saying all dictators were put there by the people. Yes, I am going to give you the finger if you disagree.

[Stunaep]

and France,  Germany, Estonia, Egypt, ****ing Kaplachtotchistan don't have freedom? Right now, the US has probably the least freedom of said countries, because of 9/11.

No, culture (or semi-culture, or culture for dummies, or whatever you call it) is what it's about. Makes sense too, considering that the US is 99% immigrants, from all over the world. They've done an excellent job wiping out the natives, back in the industrial revolution period. So, of course, if a great number people from all around the globe get together, their cultures is mixed, and some half-baked **** forms that appeals to idiots all over the globe.

And then there's the thing that their economic progress was about 4 times as fast as the rest of the world back in the 20th century, which made it possible to spread that culture.