Originally posted by Xelion
You'd understand what I mean't if you've flown real aircraft before
Actually, perhaps in a civilian vehicle, sure. But in a fighter, its a different story. Perhaps if you'd ever been in the cockpit of the real deal, you'd have a different story.
Originally posted by Odyssey
[color=cc9900]Usually because plane manufacturers realise that it would be terminally dumb to cover the throttle with buttons. Not only is your hand rarely anywhere near the throttle, when your hand is near the throttle it's handy to be able to just grip it and move it without having to look for fear of your life in case you hit the trim rocker when you're a few metres above the runway.
Of course, with computers it's a different matter, and hence the design ethics go all screwy. [/color]
You are correct--if you're limiting yourself to civilian craft.
Throttle from an F16:

Throttle from an F4:

Throttle from an Su-27:

You have to keep in mind that a fighter puts as much stuff on the stick and throttle as possible, so that in a stressful moment, the pilot doesn't have to go looking for the critical gear. My stick and throttle are taken directly from the cockpit of an F16, design wise. All the buttons, knobs, hats and switches are in the same places as they are in the real deal. None are added and none are removed. The only differences are in the rotation of some of the hats, and the orientation of the speedbrake switch. Trim, for example, is on the joystick, where it belongs.
Please, gentlment, if you're going to talk about hardware--especially HOTAS hardware--get your facts straight and know what you're talking about.