See, here's the problem. It's the attitude. In fact I did have to go and read the ****ing manual. Since the webconfig for SAMBA refused to work, I had to go and manually create a conf file.
And I'm perfectly aware that linux uses the x protocol. But what you arguing about is semantics. If I used the wrong term, you immediately jump all over me when my meaning is still quite clear.
And even the x thing isn't that clearcut anymore, not with xfree86 changing their licensing and some people up at arms about it.
Did I say xChat was inferior? No, I said it wasn't as good as mirc. This obviously meant that, _to me_ , xChat wasn't what I had in mind since I wanted a client that had scripts available easily. Again you jumped at this and lashed out.
And you just proved my point. So resolution and colour depth is now hot changeable. Great. Why don't you just quickly state how it could be done instead of screaming at me? I didn't find it in the documentation and it wouldn't be that hard to put a quick explanation (like "the controls for that is hidden in xyz" or "type this into a terminal").
The linux community isn't even as good as the HLP about FS3. At least there's a single FAQ you could point to for people asking about FS3. There isn't such a thing for linux that everyone likes to point to. For a group so rabid about getting people off windows they sure don't do a good job of it.
