Originally posted by IceFire
Actually Dave Baranec said that...and that was many months after I had asked that type of question.
I always figured they were hinting that subspace was the bigger problem. Capella was an attempt to salvage another situation perhaps...
Well, since they've associated mass with subspace (artificial jumps having to be done in a large gravity well like a star's) it's got something to do with that.
Using that as an idea, you can see why they hinted at planet-sized spaceships in FS3 that you'd be flying around the surface of and strategically blowing subsystems up. (That comment was a response to fan suggestions for FS3 being simple stuff like a new ship class or two, not the standard fanboi comments like: "A DYSON SPHER3 WOULD BE SO KEWL!!!111")
Afterall, the Shivans might be having super-uber sized installations to fiddle with the fabric of subspace.
Needless to say, vote for me for FS3 writer/designer!
