Author Topic: one more idea from me.  (Read 6702 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TopAce

  • Stalwart contributor
  • 212
  • FREDder, FSWiki editor, and tester
Harbringers don't have that firing range.
My community contributions - Get my campaigns from here.

I already announced my retirement twice, yet here I am. If I bring up that topic again, don't believe a word.

 

Offline Peter

  • 24
Just drop one near a planet and let gravity do the rest... who needs a radar lock when you are sitting over a planet anyway? Its woudn't imagine a planet is that easy to miss from orbit.

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
A Harbinger would most likely do tectonic damage to the planet anyway :)

 

Offline Flaser

  • 210
  • man/fish warsie
Quote
Originally posted by TopAce
Harbringers don't have that firing range.


Read the technical data: it IS an orbital bombardment device.
"I was going to become a speed dealer. If one stupid fairytale turns out to be total nonsense, what does the young man do? If you answered, “Wake up and face reality,” you don’t remember what it was like being a young man. You just go to the next entry in the catalogue of lies you can use to destroy your life." - John Dolan

 

Offline Black Wolf

  • Twisted Infinities
  • 212
  • Hey! You! Get off-a my cloud!
    • Visit the TI homepage!
Quote
Originally posted by Flipside
A Harbinger would most likely do tectonic damage to the planet anyway :)


Actually, given its size, it probably wouldn't, at least, not major stuff.

*Has been reading some interesting Geology books has he* :D
TWISTED INFINITIES · SECTORGAME· FRONTLINES
Rarely Updated P3D.
Burn the heretic who killed F2S! Burn him, burn him!!- GalEmp

 

Offline TopAce

  • Stalwart contributor
  • 212
  • FREDder, FSWiki editor, and tester
Quote
Originally posted by Peter
Just drop one near a planet and let gravity do the rest... who needs a radar lock when you are sitting over a planet anyway? Its woudn't imagine a planet is that easy to miss from orbit.


Ops, I forgot about gravity. :)
My community contributions - Get my campaigns from here.

I already announced my retirement twice, yet here I am. If I bring up that topic again, don't believe a word.

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Simply dropping missiles from orbit wouldn't work too well unless you don't care what you hit. There is a lot of time during the entry for the bomb to be blown quite far off of course.

Of course the original harbinger probably had a guidence system to compensate for that.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline TopAce

  • Stalwart contributor
  • 212
  • FREDder, FSWiki editor, and tester
Would a heat-seeking something work? Let's guess hostile installations have hostile IFF so that the missile could detect it.
My community contributions - Get my campaigns from here.

I already announced my retirement twice, yet here I am. If I bring up that topic again, don't believe a word.

 

Offline DragonClaw

  • Romeo Kilo India Foxtrot
  • 210
Quote
Originally posted by TopAce
*Imagines a grey GTD Orion*


*envisions a fenris with shark teeth*

 

Offline StratComm

  • The POFressor
  • 212
  • Cameron Crazy
    • http://www.geocities.com/cek_83/index.html
Quote
Originally posted by karajorma
Simply dropping missiles from orbit wouldn't work too well unless you don't care what you hit. There is a lot of time during the entry for the bomb to be blown quite far off of course.

Of course the original harbinger probably had a guidence system to compensate for that.


When you're dropping gigaton+ bombs, you don't particularly care what you hit.  If the Harbringer were to miss by a couple of miles, who cares?  You're still going to destroy whatever it is that you were targeting and everything else nearby.
who needs a signature? ;)
It's not much of an excuse for a website, but my stuff can be found here

"Holding the last thread on a page comes with an inherent danger, especially when you are edit-happy with your posts.  For you can easily continue editing in points without ever noticing that someone else could have refuted them." ~Me, on my posting behavior

Last edited by StratComm on 08-23-2027 at 08:34 PM

 
StratComm: without at least basic targetting and wind compensation, you're going to miss by more than just a mile or two.  You could well end up hitting the wrong city entirely.

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
True but hitting the jet steam could easily push a bomb more than a couple of miles out of range. Remember that the harbinger is powered. With no attitude control it could end up anywhere :D
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 
NICO, How could you insult that fine legacy. For shame! :mad:
Don't think of it as being outnumbered. Think of it as having a wide target selection !

ICQ#: 5256653
[email protected]

Projects: Gundam TC, Trek BTFF, REF, and Beyond Redemption
http://photo.starblvd.net/Star_Dragon

 

Offline Peter

  • 24
a single 25Mt bomb would totally destroy everything within 16.9 miles of ground zero assuming a airburst. (that dosen't include the outer area where the overpressure is under 3psi )

so, according to what I have just read, I can make a 901 square mile area uninhabitable with a single 250mt bomb (thats around twenty times less powerfull than the Harbinger than we are looking at)

I would just drop a few dozen harbingers and take my chances with hitting something.

Hey, I don't even need to hit my target. After a couple of explosions like that there's going to so much of the planet left permantly uninhabitable that whoever I missed wouldn't be able to survive for long anyway. If the explosion wouldn't get them the radiation would (not to mention the EMP's going to fry anything electronic so they can't do a runner with a ship)

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
I agree with you there. If you don't particularly care what you hit then unguided harbingers are fine :)
« Last Edit: May 27, 2004, 05:25:17 am by 340 »
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Nico

  • Venom
    Parlez-vous Model Magician?
  • 212
Quote
Originally posted by ShadowDrakken
StratComm: without at least basic targetting and wind compensation, you're going to miss by more than just a mile or two.  You could well end up hitting the wrong city entirely.


So what? The harbinger, from what I remember, is in the gigaton range, no? You can level a whole region with that, if not a full piece of country :p
We're not talking chirurgical strikes here ;)
Anyway, like the GTVA would not be able to have a gidance system for that :p
SCREW CANON!

  

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Quote
Originally posted by Nico
Anyway, like the GTVA would not be able to have a gidance system for that :p


That's basically what the whole discussion was about. Why the Harbinger had to be guided. It wouldn't work as an unguided weapon as the only way you could use it was to simply obliterate the planet you dropped it on.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Peter

  • 24
lets face it, your not going to do a precsion drop on one target with a multi gigaton weapon.

At the time when you drop one you are pretty much accepting your going to wipe out a noticible portion of the planet, such weapons wouln't be used to blow up one target.

I am sure they did have a guidence system though.

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
"aim away from face"

 

Offline Peter

  • 24
"Not tested on animals"