Author Topic: Need help controlling fighter beams :(  (Read 1824 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Need help controlling fighter beams :(
I'm attempting to scale down all the trek models so they all can be piloted like fighters. I'm aware that the AI for fighter ain't exactly top notch, but the fight is much more fast paced.

So far I shrunk the Galaxy and the Vorcha cruiser to the size of a Medusa bomber. They also have at most 5 AI turret controlled weapons. I put gun points of course so you can have manual forward fighter beams or pulse weapons.

My problem:

Its actually funny. When these Mini-Me starships start shooting each other, they knock each other around with each blast. I can't even aim because my ship keeps spinning like crazy when it gets hit.

Attempted solutions:

I've tried to match the POFs' mass with a cruiser sized vessel.
I've lowered the mass and damage of all the beam weapons I've made for Trek. (could some one explain mass to me)

All attemps failed to resolve this issue.


Does FSO base Beam impact strength by size ratio?

 

Offline Deepblue

  • Corporate Shill
  • 210
Need help controlling fighter beams :(
:lol:

 

Offline Singh

  • Hasn't Accomplished Anything Special Or Notable
  • 211
  • Degrees of guilt.
Need help controlling fighter beams :(
not really. Reduce the mass of the weapons to 0.1 or 0.2 in the .tbls. Anything higher than >1 will cause this problem.
"Blessed be the FREDder that knows his sexps."
"Cursed be the FREDder that trusts FRED2_Open."
Dreamed of much, accomplished little. :(

 
Need help controlling fighter beams :(
Nope. Tried that already. I did notice that Modelview has the "moment of inertia" settings that PCS doesn't. Unfortunately, any model created by Styxx's 3dsmax plugin refuses to be modified by Modelview. It smply crashes on save.

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
Need help controlling fighter beams :(
try opening and saveing in PCS then try model view
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 
Need help controlling fighter beams :(
Tried that already. I have the latest version of Modelview as well.

  

Offline Getter Robo G

  • 211
  • Elite Super Robot Pilot
That's what you get for such blasphemy!

  (Joking!)

   "Sir the Klingons are telling us to surrender!"

   "Really? Tell Mini-Chang to kiss my ass, IF he can reach that high!"

:lol:
"Don't think of it as being out-numbered, think of it as having a WIDE target selection!"

"I am the one and ONLY Star Dragon..."
Proof for the noobs:  Member Search

[I'm Just an idea guy, NOT: a modeler, texturer, or coder... Word of advice, "Watch out for the ducks!"]

Robotech II - Continuing...
FS2 Trek - Snails move faster than me...
Star Blazers: Journey to Iscandar...
FS GUNDAM - The Myth lives on... :)

 
Need help controlling fighter beams :(
Blasphemy??? Against what? Truespace? The pathetic excuse for a 3d program?

 

Offline StratComm

  • The POFressor
  • 212
  • Cameron Crazy
    • http://www.geocities.com/cek_83/index.html
Need help controlling fighter beams :(
I just tried Aurora too, it fails on loading a MAX generated model as well.  Of course, said model also happens to crash the game, so it's hardly a suprise that it doesn't work.  I'm trying to get one that was converted without anything but the most basic heirarchy information, to see if it's model related or if it's something else.
who needs a signature? ;)
It's not much of an excuse for a website, but my stuff can be found here

"Holding the last thread on a page comes with an inherent danger, especially when you are edit-happy with your posts.  For you can easily continue editing in points without ever noticing that someone else could have refuted them." ~Me, on my posting behavior

Last edited by StratComm on 08-23-2027 at 08:34 PM

 

Offline Solatar

  • 211
Need help controlling fighter beams :(
in the Flags section, add like "no_beam_whack" I think it is. I had this same problem with making a beam version of the ML-16 Laser. I'm pretty sure it's in the newer SCP builds.

 

Offline StratComm

  • The POFressor
  • 212
  • Cameron Crazy
    • http://www.geocities.com/cek_83/index.html
Need help controlling fighter beams :(
That said, we still need to get the moment of inertia thing straightened out.  It's that last setting that makes a ship complete, and if it isn't set it becomes obvious pretty quickly.  Either the MAX plugin needs to calculate it manually, or something needs the ability to edit them that can also edit everything else.
who needs a signature? ;)
It's not much of an excuse for a website, but my stuff can be found here

"Holding the last thread on a page comes with an inherent danger, especially when you are edit-happy with your posts.  For you can easily continue editing in points without ever noticing that someone else could have refuted them." ~Me, on my posting behavior

Last edited by StratComm on 08-23-2027 at 08:34 PM

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Need help controlling fighter beams :(
So far, AFAIK noone has figured out MOI.  I remember digging about in the code when it was first released, trying to figure out how to set it.... but to be honest I didn't know enough about the structure to find anything concrete.  My impression was that it was being used as a multiplier for a very large number, IIRC.

 

Offline StratComm

  • The POFressor
  • 212
  • Cameron Crazy
    • http://www.geocities.com/cek_83/index.html
Need help controlling fighter beams :(
No one knows what it does but everyone knows what happens when it's left blank, especially on fighters.  You get the bouncy-ship-of-doom, exactly as Omni is describing.  If memory serves, CoW got some flack when it was released because the fighters in it suffered from a lack of decent MOI data.  I usually just copy it from another ship of similar size myself, since that is more than enough to stabilize the ship in-game.
who needs a signature? ;)
It's not much of an excuse for a website, but my stuff can be found here

"Holding the last thread on a page comes with an inherent danger, especially when you are edit-happy with your posts.  For you can easily continue editing in points without ever noticing that someone else could have refuted them." ~Me, on my posting behavior

Last edited by StratComm on 08-23-2027 at 08:34 PM

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Need help controlling fighter beams :(
Quote
Originally posted by StratComm
No one knows what it does but everyone knows what happens when it's left blank, especially on fighters.  You get the bouncy-ship-of-doom, exactly as Omni is describing.  If memory serves, CoW got some flack when it was released because the fighters in it suffered from a lack of decent MOI data.  I usually just copy it from another ship of similar size myself, since that is more than enough to stabilize the ship in-game.


Actually, all the MOI (and center point and mass) data in CoW was copied from similar ships, or at least the closest ships I could find.

 

Offline StratComm

  • The POFressor
  • 212
  • Cameron Crazy
    • http://www.geocities.com/cek_83/index.html
Need help controlling fighter beams :(
Really?  I must be thinking of a different release.  No offense intended by that of course, aldo :)
who needs a signature? ;)
It's not much of an excuse for a website, but my stuff can be found here

"Holding the last thread on a page comes with an inherent danger, especially when you are edit-happy with your posts.  For you can easily continue editing in points without ever noticing that someone else could have refuted them." ~Me, on my posting behavior

Last edited by StratComm on 08-23-2027 at 08:34 PM