[Blitzerland]

Originally posted by Kamikaze
I suppose said method involves a hatchet.

At the bottom of your post it says "last edited by Setekh"...what else involving a hatchet did you post?

You should know from the request thread that when admins edit posts, that tag doesn't appear after the edit. // Setekh

[Knight Templar]

Ugh. Tool. He put tha... err.. never mind.

And the film is only 82 minutes long? wtf?

[Blitzerland]

Originally posted by Knight Templar
Ugh. Tool. He put tha... err.. never mind.

And the film is only 82 minutes long? wtf?

That means you only have to suffer for a short amount of time.

[an0n]

The fool-proof way to destroy Creationism lies within their own logic.

Everything in the Bible is taken as being 100% true. No metaphors. No synonyms. All word-for-word accurate, God's honest truth.

And they also state that all animals were created and no biological adaptation can take place and result in the formation of a new species.

Also stated in the Bible are the exact measurements of Noah's Ark.

Now, take the volume of every known species of non-flying, non-amphibious, non-marine (salt water, you'd still need to Ark freshwater ones) animal on the Earth today.

By Creationist logic, all those animals have always existed. And the only way they could still be around, thanks to there being no evolution, is if Noah physically saved them by bringing them aboard the Ark.

Now, double the volume of all those animals and I'm betting it's at least an order of magnitude greater than the maximum possible volume of the Ark, not accounting for required food, fresh water and waste.

Since there is no evolution, the measurements stated for Noah's Ark must be wrong. So the Bible is wrong. This is a direct contradiction of their morale foundation from which they take the high ground.

So even going by their own beliefs it doesn't make a ****ing lick of sense.

[Stealth]

it was over-rated.  i went in expecting to see a great film.  it had its good parts, its funny parts, but overall i was disappointed

[an0n]

I feel physically ****ing sick whenever I so much as think about the pile of ****e.

I'd rather staple my nuts to a stack of crackers, than watch so much as a second of it.

[Bobboau]

dude, that isn't going to stop a creationist, it's almost like you've never argued with one before, though I know you have, the responce would be a simple "it was a mirical" you see if you point out how something in the Bible is imposable they turn it around to actualy make there case stronger (from there perception) it is imposable to try to convince them of anything other than there dogma.

[Blue Lion]

Originally posted by Knight Templar
Ugh. Tool. He put tha... err.. never mind.
 

You know the dates kinda line up, so I would have probably thought the same thing.

[an0n]

Originally posted by Bobboau
dude, that isn't going to stop a creationist, it's almost like you've never argued with one before, though I know you have, the responce would be a simple "it was a mirical" you see if you point out how something in the Bible is imposable they turn it around to actualy make there case stronger (from there perception) it is imposable to try to convince them of anything other than there dogma.

It's never about convincing them, it's about converting innocent bystanders.

[Ace]

You mean protecting innocent bystanders from the ruinous forces of stupidity

[Carl]

Originally posted by an0n
The fool-proof way to destroy Creationism lies within their own logic.

Everything in the Bible is taken as being 100% true. No metaphors. No synonyms. All word-for-word accurate, God's honest truth.

And they also state that all animals were created and no biological adaptation can take place and result in the formation of a new species.

Also stated in the Bible are the exact measurements of Noah's Ark.

Now, take the volume of every known species of non-flying, non-amphibious, non-marine (salt water, you'd still need to Ark freshwater ones) animal on the Earth today.

By Creationist logic, all those animals have always existed. And the only way they could still be around, thanks to there being no evolution, is if Noah physically saved them by bringing them aboard the Ark.

Now, double the volume of all those animals and I'm betting it's at least an order of magnitude greater than the maximum possible volume of the Ark, not accounting for required food, fresh water and waste.

Since there is no evolution, the measurements stated for Noah's Ark must be wrong. So the Bible is wrong. This is a direct contradiction of their morale foundation from which they take the high ground.

So even going by their own beliefs it doesn't make a ****ing lick of sense.

You know, it has been calculated before, and it turns out that the ark is something like 3 times (don't quote me on that, i forgot the exact number, but it was something like that) bigger than it needs to be to fit all the animals.

[Bobboau]

yeah, you know there are a lot of diferent animals right?
I mean think about all the hundreds of mice species in south american that all lookexacly the same but they have like one more bone in there tail or something,

[an0n]

The reason the volume is thought to be sufficient is because people don't count things like insects.

And , if you go by the exact wording of the Bible, it should be two of every animal. Which means two blue whales, two killer whales, two whale sharks..........

[Shrike]

Yeah, but those float.

Or maybe they had those bathtub blue whales, you know, add water and they grow.  Like Sea Monkeys, except 200 tons.

[Knight Templar]

Originally posted by an0n
The reason the volume is thought to be sufficient is because people don't count things like insects.

And , if you go by the exact wording of the Bible, it should be two of every animal. Which means two blue whales, two killer whales, two whale sharks..........

Well, not to mention that all that purified rain water would kill salt water animals methinks.

[Stealth]

if it was purified, and it was rainwater, then how come the oceans are still salty?  cause raining for what was it, 40 days and 40 nights?  that's enough to dilute all the oceans...


BUUUUT it didn't.  

remember, think before you post.

[an0n]

If it did rain enough to flood the Earth, then that rain had to come from somewhere.

The only place it coulda come from is if there was a massive evapouration prior to the flood. Which would mean massively increased salinity if the sea. Which would mean the death of every sea-bound creature.

[Setekh]

Originally posted by an0n
Everything in the Bible is taken as being 100% true. No metaphors. No synonyms. All word-for-word accurate, God's honest truth.

Man, you been fed some pretty big lies wherever you heard that. I'll talk to you about it later, though.

[phreak]

i doubt thats what an0n thinks, but some people do over in the US.

pretty scary if you run into those sorry ****s.

[an0n]

Personally I think all religion is utter trash.

And when I'm in my 'dont care' mood, I'm willing to accept the principle of faith, but the methodology behind all the current religions still seems like pure bull****.