Author Topic: Report concludes no WMD in Iraq  (Read 1680 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline IPAndrews

  • Disgruntled Customer
  • 212
  • This site stole my work
Report concludes no WMD in Iraq
No WMD? What about Iraq's desolator troops? You know, the ones who go into enemy territory and poison the land with radioactive contamination. I'd call those a WMD.
Be warned: This site's admins stole 100s of hours of my work. They will do it to you.

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Report concludes no WMD in Iraq
Quote
Originally posted by Rictor
which you doubt?


All.  I would find it odd if Iraq did destroy all its WMD, but I can't see any nation (i.e. Syria) accepting them, and in the absence of any known / proven terrorist links, it actually seems as likely they destroyed them as anything else.

Possibly Saddam was paranoid someone would use WMD on him in a coup or something, I don't know.  Maybe they destroyed them and never told him.  Maybe they couldn't afford to keep them (with the inevitable US action if they used them), but wanted to preserve pride.  I don't know... but it's becoming obvious to me that UNMOVIC should have been left to finish their job rather than have a war.

  

Offline Turnsky

  • FOXFIRE Artisté
  • 211
  • huh?.. Who?.. hey you kids, git off me lawn!
Report concludes no WMD in Iraq
only one thing to say to that...


"DUH!"
   //Warning\\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
do not torment the sleep deprived artist, he may be vicious when cornered,
in case of emergency, administer caffeine to the artist,
he will become docile after that,
and less likely to stab you in the eye with a mechanical pencil
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------