Author Topic: You think the Iraq thing is bad  (Read 5374 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
You think the Iraq thing is bad
Quote
Originally posted by vyper
I think I saw that BP episode. That explains why John Leslie was forced to leave...


"Today children, we're going to tell you how to get money off the tabloids for claiming rape!"

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
You think the Iraq thing is bad
Get Down Blair! ;)

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
You think the Iraq thing is bad

  
You think the Iraq thing is bad
Quote
Originally posted by Zarax

3) Do you know what are the speeds playing when you talk about ICBMs?
If you make a ton of C4 exploding in the exact moment an ICBM passes it's not going to near hit it, as it's 8 times faster than the explosion propagation speed.


IIRC, the interceptor missile actually uses kinetic force to destroy the warhead, not an explosion. It rams the ICBM at about 15,000mph.

Thats if the whole system will work, or if it's really 'near operational,' of course.
Carpe Diem Poste Crastinus

"When life gives you lemons...
Blind people with them..."

"Yah, dude, penises rock." Turambar

FUKOOOOV!

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
You think the Iraq thing is bad
Quote
Originally posted by Jetmech Jr.


IIRC, the interceptor missile actually uses kinetic force to destroy the warhead, not an explosion. It rams the ICBM at about 15,000mph.

Thats if the whole system will work, or if it's really 'near operational,' of course.


I don't think that's correct - the odds of getting a direct hit would be absolutely astronomical.

 
You think the Iraq thing is bad
I got it from the Site a the beginning of the thread.
Carpe Diem Poste Crastinus

"When life gives you lemons...
Blind people with them..."

"Yah, dude, penises rock." Turambar

FUKOOOOV!

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
You think the Iraq thing is bad
Quote
Originally posted by Jetmech Jr.
I got it from the Site a the beginning of the thread.


Odd.  I distinctly remember seeing a documentary detailing how they had to use explosions for this.

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
You think the Iraq thing is bad
Didn't the US pull out a nuclear proliferation treaty in '92, though?

 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
You think the Iraq thing is bad
The interceptor explodes before the nuke reaches it, throwing a cone of shrapnel in the way of the reentry vehicle. RVs aren't all that tough, actually (they use the same kinda ceramic stuff as is on the space shuttle, and can get damaged by a large raindrop). Also, direct-contact kills aren't that difficult if you have the processing horsepower to direct the missile well enough. Apparently the Navy's Aegis system is fairly good at it using SM2-IVs.

Also, I would point out that a Russian submarine captain (of a Delta IV SSBN) was quoted a few years ago as saying that the targeting packages on his missiles have not changed. It's kinda like a default setting, I suppose, but just because the Cold War ended was not apparently enough to get folks to point their missiles in some other direction.
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

 

Offline Rictor

  • Murdered by Brazilian Psychopath
  • 29
You think the Iraq thing is bad
Quote
Originally posted by aldo_14
Didn't the US pull out a nuclear proliferation treaty in '92, though?


erm, not that I know of, though they recently pulled out of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missle Treaty, as well as violating 8 major international agreements, including the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

dunno, maybe I'm wrong, all the names get so confusing sometimes.