Originally posted by Shrike
There's a very large difference between the plutonium powerpacks they use in space probes (which are extremely safe and have very low energy emissions) and a nuclear thermal rocket, which basically pours reaction mass through a nuclear reactor to generate thrust.
They're efficient, with even the most basic types having double the ISP of conventional rockets, but there's a certain justification in being leery over the technology. If one blows up from a malfunction it'll be a big ****ing mess.
For the record, I support the use of NTRs, but then again I don't live right next to where they'd be launched . . .
It's only natural if you don't live near the launching area.
In space, none of this would matter so much. OK, we're all thinking with fission power here, right? Fusion would be much safer (when feasible) correct? In that case, I would be for NTRs.