Author Topic: so they didnt blow up the shuttle again  (Read 2382 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
so they didnt blow up the shuttle again
Quote
Originally posted by Turnsky


besides, there's enough radiation in space as it is, it's not like a little itty bitty nuclear engine would do much harm, seeing as there's the largest nuclear furnace locally sitting in the heart of our system...

these people don't think, seriously. :doubt:


I would imagine the concern would be possible fallout from any sort of accident close enough to the earth for debris to enter the atmosphere.  I'm not sure about dispersion rates and how concentrated it'd be (i.e. how lethal), but I'd imagine high-altitude fallout could spread quite a distance.

That and the paranoia your enemy might decide to take their little nuclear rocket and aim it at you with a timer on it.

 
so they didnt blow up the shuttle again
Quote
Originally posted by Shrike
There's a very large difference between the plutonium powerpacks they use in space probes (which are extremely safe and have very low energy emissions) and a nuclear thermal rocket, which basically pours reaction mass through a nuclear reactor to generate thrust.

They're efficient, with even the most basic types having double the ISP of conventional rockets, but there's a certain justification in being leery over the technology.  If one blows up from a malfunction it'll be a big ****ing mess.

For the record, I support the use of NTRs, but then again I don't live right next to where they'd be launched . . .

It's only natural if you don't live near the launching area.

In space, none of this would matter so much. OK, we're all thinking with fission power here, right? Fusion would be much safer (when feasible) correct? In that case, I would be for NTRs.

  

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
so they didnt blow up the shuttle again
nuclear rockets are definately the way to go, its just the problem that you have to go through the atmosphere to get into space. you could probibly launch an un-fueled reactor and use railguns to launch the nuclear material into orbit to be retrieved and installed into the nuclear engine. the alternative is to set up space mining to retreave usefuill isotopes from the moon/asteroids. the catch 22 is that in order to set up space mining infrastructures you will probibly need nuclear engines. i figure ion engines could be used in the interim. ion engines cant reach escape velocity but they make orbital transfers a hell of alot more effietient.
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline Turnsky

  • FOXFIRE Artisté
  • 211
  • huh?.. Who?.. hey you kids, git off me lawn!
so they didnt blow up the shuttle again
well, once one moves past the earth's orbit, the prospect of using a nuclear fired engine system becomes more hopeful
   //Warning\\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
do not torment the sleep deprived artist, he may be vicious when cornered,
in case of emergency, administer caffeine to the artist,
he will become docile after that,
and less likely to stab you in the eye with a mechanical pencil
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------