Author Topic: Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor  (Read 4269 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Carl

  • Render artist
  • 211
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/
"Gunnery control, fry that ****er!" - nuclear1

 

Offline neo_hermes

  • MmmmmmNode!
  • 28
  • What the hell are you lookin at?
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
yay :)
Hell has no fury like an0n...
killing threads is...well, what i do best.

 

Offline Mefustae

  • 210
  • Chevron locked...
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
Hmmmm, American aircraft suddenly all but impervious to incoming missiles...I'm not sure why, but I just don't really feel comfortable with US Aircraft - the most powerful in the world - suddenly becoming nigh-on invincible to standard weaponry...

  

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
I'm scared of anyone getting a technological edge that removes the balance of fear (of defeat).  Of course, the Us has been picking 'easy' wars of late, so I'm not sure it'd make that much difference it'd make.

 

Offline Kosh

  • A year behind what's funny
  • 210
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
Quote
Originally posted by Mefustae
Hmmmm, American aircraft suddenly all but impervious to incoming missiles...I'm not sure why, but I just don't really feel comfortable with US Aircraft - the most powerful in the world - suddenly becoming nigh-on invincible to standard weaponry...



The new designs are pretty close. They have stealth technology so you can't use radar (and IR if it happens to be one of the stealth bombers, not sure about the fighters), and they are painted black so they are almost impossible to spot visually at night. Those add up to something pretty close to invincibility unless someone figures out how to crack stealth tech.
"The reason for this is that the original Fortran got so convoluted and extensive (10's of millions of lines of code) that no-one can actually figure out how it works, there's a massive project going on to decode the original Fortran and write a more modern system, but until then, the UK communication network is actually relying heavily on 35 year old Fortran that nobody understands." - Flipside

Brain I/O error
Replace and press any key

 

Offline Fragrag

  • 26
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
Wow, sleek, sounds cool and deadly, I don't care if I get killed by one of those, well, actually, I would, seeing as I die and all. But at least I would die like those many pilots in Freespace. Which is not good at all. Disregard what I say
"On this day...my pants are filled....with joy" -Singh, doing the pants game
My blog, with 'gorillarape' in the url, who wouldn't visit it?!

 
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
You know how they shot down that stealth bomber in yugoslavia? That  bomber was flying the same route 3 times in a row. On the third time, three people with cellphones, and one with a RPG is needed. One person hears the plane pass, class the third. Second person hears the plane pass, calls the third. Third does some rough calculation, then times, and tells the RPG guy to fire straight upwards. Bam.

I doubt this thing is cheap enough to find widespread use. Also, unless they pack at least two, there will be a blind angle.
just another newbie without any modding, FREDding or real programming experience

you haven't learned masochism until you've tried to read a Microsoft help file.  -- Goober5000
I've got 2 drug-addict syblings and one alcoholic whore. And I'm a ****ing sociopath --an0n
You cannot defeat Windows through strength alone. Only patience, a lot of good luck, and a sledgehammer will do the job. --StratComm

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
I read the serbs got that stealth by using heavy AAAf to create a corridor of least resistance, and suckered it into a hittable position.  I believe it was an SA-6 or SA-7 SAM that hit it.

 

Offline DeepSpace9er

  • Bakha bombers rule
  • 28
  • Avoid the beam and you wont get hit
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
Quote
Those add up to something pretty close to invincibility unless someone figures out how to crack stealth tech.


I think the Russians were developing this radar that pulses in all directions so rapidly that it is able to detect stealth signatures, and identify them. Thats what i heard, i havent looked it up.

 

Offline Mefustae

  • 210
  • Chevron locked...
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
I'm not exactly intamately informed upon the Russian's current status Militarily and Economically; but I know for damn sure that they wouldn't be developing something like that right now...let alone make it known on the internet :p...

 

Offline DaBrain

  • Screensniper
  • 212
    • Shadows of Lylat board
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
Invincible?

Don't make me laugh. Just add some mirrors to the missile's armor and the laser has no chance anymore. ;7

Laser = light

Light = can be reflected be a mirror

Simple logics. :lol:

Maybe the missle could even reflect the laser back to the fighter.. :eek:


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
(Joking)
--------------------------------------------------
SoL is looking for a sound effect artist
Please PM me in case you want to apply
---------------------------------
Shadows of Lylat - A Freespace 2 total conversion
(hosted by Game-Warden)
----------------------------------

 

Offline vyper

  • 210
  • The Sexy Scotsman
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
Quote
Originally posted by DeepSpace9er


I think the Russians were developing this radar that pulses in all directions so rapidly that it is able to detect stealth signatures, and identify them. Thats what i heard, i havent looked it up.


I don't have the link, but Glasgow uni  cracked stealth radar quite some time ago.
"But you live, you learn.  Unless you die.  Then you're ****ed." - aldo14

 
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
Quote
Originally posted by vyper


I don't have the link, but Glasgow uni  cracked stealth radar quite some time ago.



linkage.

 
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
Umm...yay. Our tax dollars at work. Some of this new tech is damn scary. I'd rather have a free education. :no:

 
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
America doesn't have free education? o.O

EDIT: Hmm...you probably meant college and university. :P
Boo for not being able to delete your own posts. >O

This is not a signature.
You did not see this.
It was all a dream.
You will not tell anyone about this.

Now go and read this signature again.

So, you actually bothered to scroll down, eh? If you're that bored, you might as well take a look at the links above.

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
Quote
Originally posted by DaBrain
Invincible?

Don't make me laugh. Just add some mirrors to the missile's armor and the laser has no chance anymore. ;7

Laser = light

Light = can be reflected be a mirror

Simple logics. :lol:

Maybe the missle could even reflect the laser back to the fighter.. :eek:


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
(Joking)


/*gives laser the ability to fire at any range within a very wide spectrum, includeing those redaly absobed by mirrors.*/
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
This reminds me of that Airforce General from Zero Hour :D

 

Offline Stealth

  • Braiiins...
  • 211
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
Quote
Originally posted by kasperl
You know how they shot down that stealth bomber in yugoslavia? That  bomber was flying the same route 3 times in a row. On the third time, three people with cellphones, and one with a RPG is needed. One person hears the plane pass, class the third. Second person hears the plane pass, calls the third. Third does some rough calculation, then times, and tells the RPG guy to fire straight upwards. Bam.



i'm sure it's SLIGHTLY more complicated than that.  a second timing off, plus one variable not laid down correctly, and it wouldn't work

 

Offline Carl

  • Render artist
  • 211
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
Quote
Originally posted by DaBrain
Invincible?

Don't make me laugh. Just add some mirrors to the missile's armor and the laser has no chance anymore. ;7

Laser = light

Light = can be reflected be a mirror

Simple logics. :lol:

Maybe the missle could even reflect the laser back to the fighter.. :eek:


the laser would melt the mirror.
"Gunnery control, fry that ****er!" - nuclear1

 

Offline Ashrak

  • Not Banned
  • 210
    • Imagination Designs
Pentagon creates ML-16 predecessor
Quote
Originally posted by RangerKarl
This reminds me of that Airforce General from Zero Hour :D



:nod:


king raptors for the win
I hate My signature!