Originally posted by karajorma
It's incorrect. The last supervolcanic erruption actually did come quite close to wiping us out but it was because the world got too cold not too warm.
It's basically the same thing that causes a nuclear winter. Clouds of soot block out the sun and everything gets colder as a result.
Yeah, the Toba supervolcano 74,000 years ago in Sumatra. It's believed it wiped out all but a few thousand people; it's believed to have caused between 3-4C cooling. Apparently, Toba was IE7 on the 0-8 eruption scale. Yellowstones last eruption, 2.1 million years ago is classed as an IE8 - ten times that of Toba.
Scary stuff, especially as it's been calculated Yellowstone erupts in 600,000 year cycles and thus could be 'due' (in a geological timescale, which could mean decades, centuries or longer from now). Assuming the cycle is a constant one.
Originally posted by karajorma
Then he's missing a rather major part of the equation there. Global dimming is the main reason why we haven't seen much sharper temperature rises.
Global dimming is relatively new as a term but the science behind it is pretty old. We've known for ages that particulate matter could block out the sun and make the world colder. It's simply that no one had realised how big an effect this was still having now.
Just an example of global dimmings effects, IIRc the trails of air traffic have a measurable affect. When all air traffic was grounded at 9/11 - the only time this experiment could be carried out - and air contrails dissappeared, the average cold/hot variation in temperature in the US rose by 1.1C. (I've read 5 degrees in heavy air traffic regions, but that didn't have F/C given)
Global dimming is, I think, something that has been neglected in media and educational coverage; I only read of (the details of) it fairly recently. From what I know, the rate of increase in global temperature is
less than expected from the rise in greenhouse gases - global dimming is the explanation, and it means we (well, some people) probably have been underestimating the problem significantly.