Well, I see no direct harm from homosexuality, nor do I despise or hate homosexuals, but the simple fact is that it simply isn't normal....
It's not what a human is design to do, it's not what he's supposed to do and it most certanily isn't a lyfestyle choice.
Suffice to say I think it's better for children to grow up in a normal family (normal enviroment) than in a homosexual one.
The sad thing is that there are usually more kids needing adoption than willing families ..can one afford to be picky then?
Define 'normal', though?
I mean, every behaviour can be termed as minority in some community or the other. Monogamy, for example, is really only 'normal' within a modern, Western Christian context. Homosexuality and bisexuality occurs in Bonobos as mentioned earlier, and also in other (non-primate, too) species.
The concept of the human body being 'designed' for heterosexuality is rather odd, though, because the whole 'design' concept is obviously a misnomer. As is 'supposed' to do. We are designed to mate and reproduce. Whilst homosexuality seems to run contrary to that, it does not impinge the capacity for reproduction, and as we can see through historical prevelance, it certainly does not prevent it from occuring. More so, if it is not a 'lyfestyle choice' (sic), then how can it be - to paraphrase - against nature? Clearly if it
is genetic and common (depending on which statistics you choose, as common as being left handed), then it is very much natural even if the cause of selection is odd.
Even then, (arguably) nature abhors normality; normalcy entails staticness, inability to adapt, lack of diversity. The 'isn't normal' arguement I always find to be a very odd one; particularly considering we are a species that doesn't even have a type specimen for a skeleton, let along a definition of what a 'normal' human psyche is.
