[Flipside]

I didn't like T3 because of the whole 'can't change the future' thing. Both because I don't believe in fate anyway, and secondly, if changing the Future was impossible, how come this was the third Terminator that Skynet had sent back to do exactly that? And the Terminator that figured this out was of a make so old that they were obsolete. And, of course, if the future is immutable why did Connor bother sending back a Terminator to protect himself? If the future is unchangeable then the simple fact that Connor is alive proves that the attempt can never succeed.

It wasn't a bad movie as such, but it still left a sour taste in my mouth after the first two.

Personally, I think I'd prefer a series based on the resistance after the War to another film, do away with the whole 'Terminators are people too' crud and turn them back into the T1 mindless killing machine mode.

[Roanoke]

i wanna see Rock as the terminator. he has the muscles and mean look to be one success full robot....i think

No, no he wouldn't. That would just about destroy what little credability the film has.

T1 rocked.

T2 was a decent sequel.

T3 suck serious ass.

T4 ? My god no. Please.

[Nuclear1]

i wanna see Rock as the terminator. he has the muscles and mean look to be one success full robot....i think

No, no he wouldn't. That would just about destroy what little credability the film has.

I don't know. The Mummy Returns proved that he can play a decent bad guy (albeit not the primary villain) without having to say much, and that's all what Ah-nold's character in the first movie was all about, right?

[an0n]

The third one had that premise too...

Yeah, except he CHANGED THE ****ING DATE OF JUDGEMENT DAY.

[Sandwich]

T1 rocked.

T2 was a decent sequel.

T3 suck serious ass.

T4 ? My god no. Please.

You seriously think T1 is better than T2?

[Nuclear1]

The third one had that premise too...

Yeah, except he CHANGED THE ****ING DATE OF JUDGEMENT DAY.

Didn't they do that exact same thing in T2 by blowing up Cyberdine? "You didn't stop Judgment Day--you merely postponed it."

[Ulala]

I thought it was "no fate but what we make" and not "no fate but what we already made and oh crap that fate is no matter what effing happens or what we do to stop it the world is going to see judgement day."

T1 was great, T2 is my favorite, T3 was a slap in my face. It'll take a miracle for T4 to regain any of the respect the first films brought to the series.

[TrashMan]

Catwoman and Terminator 3 screenwriters John Brancato and Michael Ferris completed a draft (or 80 page treatment depending on who you talk to) in 2004. David C. Wilson (Supernova) was brought on to do a total re-write based on their story.

ICK!!! Teh Horror!

but you know what I hate about the Terminator series?
The charachters are theying to change the future and the battle with the high-tech killer robots is allways wihtout witnesses (or proof).
If they really wanted to change the future by T2 and especially by T3 they should have acted smarter.
Just burst into a studio during a popular show and let Arnie cut his arm off. That way the whole world would find out in a very short while insted of of 2-3 dorks fighting alone..geez.

[Ulala]

Possible for government cover-up? *shrugs*

[Sheepy]

I liked them ...

[BlackDove]

I actually think Orlando Bloom would be a much better Terminator that Schwartz.

He is a girly man physically, but he did manage to pull off Legolas quite well (as much as I hated those ****ing LOTR retarded movies), and I'm sure if they made his skull and guts of metal, he'd manage to act it out pretty good. And because he doesn't look like he's popping stereoids five times a day, he could have quite a range regarding how he could act the merciless robot killer.

I'd pay to see that.

[Mefustae]

T1 rocked.

T2 was a decent sequel.

T3 suck serious ass.

T4 ? My god no. Please.

You seriously think T1 is better than T2?

What? It was actually better, but only in the capacity that it somehow took the laughable premise of "cyborgs from the future" and made it ****ing awesome.

Better than T2 in terms of quality? Probably not. Better in terms of respect, ****ing A.

[Kosh]

With T3, they should have made it take place after Judgement Day and made a half assed attempt to say why it happened anyway. That would have made it reasonably consistent with the first and second ones.


I think the guy who wrote this stuff (http://www.goingfaster.com/term2029/skynet.html) should have been the one to write T3.

[Nuke]

you have to remember that t-4 will be a post apocalyptic future movie. the nukes already done flew. such movies tend to fail. only the govenator can save the film.

[Grug]

*crosses fingers and hopes for a Fallout-esk type story...*

[Colonol Dekker]

It better be, I wanna see WAR, WAR, WAR !!

[DeepSpace9er]

You know hollywood is desperate when the numbers at the end of the titles pass 4.

[Nuke]

the terminator series was complete after t2. but t3 opened up old wounds and now they have to tend to them. unfortunately their robot got elected govenor and now theyre gonna kill the series by using a different droid.

[Dark Hunter]

Hollywood have been complete morons for the past year......

In that time, I have seen perhaps three good films. There was a time, long ago, when there seemed to be a good movie every month.... 


When series reach a 4, hell even a 3, with few exceptions it is time for them to die.

[Kosh]

Then again Disney made how many sequels to Air Bud?