[Scooby_Doo]

technically "int main ()" is incorrect plus your missing a "\n" after "c++" 

and some people will complain about using "using namespace std"

for the loops:

#include <iostream>

int main (int argc, char *[] args)
{
     while (true)
     {
          std::cout << "**** basic\n" ;
          std::cout << "use C++\n" ;
     }

     return 0 ;
}



Or how about

Start:
     print "**** C++"
     print "Use QuickBasic"
     goto Start

[Mathwiz6]

Print "WTF is wrong with Python?"
Print "Response appreciated"
if input = useless argument:
      Argue back
      If argument = blocked:
             Argue harder
else:
      print "example of nested loops in python "

WTF is wrong with Python?
Response appreciated

[Scooby_Doo]

LOL

 I'll let the perl experts handle the umteen million different ways to do that LOL

[Hippo]

your missing a "\n" after "c++" 

I dont need that if its not looping though

[ZylonBane]

The Perl code for this would be trivial--

while() {
   print "**** C++\nUse Perl\n";
}

[Mathwiz6]

Print "**** BASIC"
Print "Use Python"


Press enter to run this baby.

Short and sweet.

[ZylonBane]

Loop it!

[Herra Tohtori]

And Java is even funnier...  

Code: [Select]

public class ScrewBasic {

 public static void main(String arguments) {

  System.out.println("***** BASIC.\nUse Java instead.\nAs you can see, it's easy and fun!");

 }
}


Now you have to save this as ScrewBasic.java, compile it in the directory with command "javac ScrewBasic.java", then run it with "java ScrewBasic"... Isn't that easy? Ands... comprehensive? ...Or?


Another one, that utilizes object-oriented programming possibilities of Java!

Code: [Select]

public class ScrewBasic {

 public String toString() {

   String string = "***** BASIC.\nUse Java instead.\nAs you can see, it's easy and fun!";
   return string;
 }


 public static void main(String arguments) {

  System.out.println(this.toString());

 }
}


 

[Mathwiz6]

z = 0

While z < 1000:
      Print "**** BASIC"
      Print "Python ownz j00"
      z += 1

[Kamikaze]

Code: [Select]

let rec main () =
  print_endline "**** any language without tail-recursion optimization!";
  main ();;

main ()


[Flipside]

#F000 DATA "USE ASSEMBLER"
#F00D LDX #00
#F010 LRX #F000
#F013 CALL #xxxx - Wherever the Firmware Screenwrite routine is
#F016 INC X
#F018 CPX #0C
#F01A JNE #F010
#F01D LDA #0D
#F01F CALL #xxxx
#F021 JMP #F00D

And I'm not even certain the LRX (Load Relative X) was a valid command now...

[Scooby_Doo]

your missing a "\n" after "c++" 

I dont need that if its not looping though

ACtually you do otherwise you'll get something like this:

**** basic use c++**** basic use C++**** basic

How about :
"**** basic$"       db     basic
"use assembly$" db     asem

mov bx, basic
mov ax, 10
int 21h

mov bx, asem
mov ax, 10
int 21h


not that i remember assembly much anymore.

[Scooby_Doo]

or how about

program basic ; begin      while true do           begin                writeln ('**** basic') ;                writeln ('use pascal') ;           end ; end.

[Ghostavo]

your missing a "\n" after "c++" 

I dont need that if its not looping though

ACtually you do otherwise you'll get something like this:

**** basic use c++**** basic use C++**** basic

[Flipside]

How about :
"**** basic$"       db     basic
"use assembly$" db     asem

mov bx, basic
mov ax, 10
int 21h

mov bx, asem
mov ax, 10
int 21h


not that i remember assembly much anymore.

Heh, you can tell why the Intel Processors won out over 6502 Mostech actually had the faster chip, but it was such anightmare to code for it that not nearly as many Assembly games got written for it, and in those days, if you wanted an action game to run at any decent speed, it HAD to be in assembly. Z80 was easier, but I remember almost none of that now.

[Hippo]

your missing a "\n" after "c++" 

I dont need that if its not looping though

ACtually you do otherwise you'll get something like this:

**** basic use c++**** basic use C++**** basic

[Goober5000]

Code: [Select]

( every-time
   ( true )
   ( send-message
      "#Command"
      "High"
      "use FRED"
   )
)
I win!

[Hippo]

* Hippo spams shift-r so that those messages never go through

[Kamikaze]

Yay for one-liners!

Code: [Select]

puts "**** non-interpreted languages!\n" until false


[ZylonBane]

Heh, you can tell why the Intel Processors won out over 6502 Mostech actually had the faster chip, but it was such anightmare to code for it that not nearly as many Assembly games got written for it

What the hell? The 6502 was the dominant CPU in the 8-bit era by a huge margin. It only lost popularity when 8-bit CPUs in general were superceded by 16/32-bit CPUs.