Author Topic: A couple more ships (Read 7137 times)

Trivial Psychic · **Reply #20 on:** October 02, 2006, 11:23:21 pm

For some reason, when I see that ship, I hear "Yellow Submarine" by the Beatles, in my mind.

NGTM-1R · **Reply #21 on:** October 02, 2006, 11:37:34 pm

I have absolutely no friggin' clue what that is supposed to be.

Colonol Dekker · **Reply #22 on:** October 03, 2006, 05:35:20 am

I'm thinking WC2 + Morningstar'ish period in the game, But i may be wrong

Scooby_Doo · **Reply #23 on:** October 03, 2006, 06:18:18 am

Well if it's not blocky it's not part of wc3/4

I have most of the ship there, in large number of big blah boxes, I'm booleaning and cutting them together, then detailing them, piece by piece.

top view

think of the metal plating as sort of a "haven't gotten beyond this point really"

Extra hints:
btw, the side angled braces \__that form the \__== are new, their suppose to act as additional bracing. (if that gives any clues)
what you think is the bridge isn't the bridge

NGTM-1R · **Reply #24 on:** October 03, 2006, 11:01:24 am

The only thing that's making any sense to me at all is the Concordia, and I know it isn't.

Scooby_Doo · **Reply #25 on:** October 03, 2006, 04:55:53 pm

I haven't touched the concordia yet.

NGTM-1R · **Reply #26 on:** October 03, 2006, 09:27:04 pm

That's not the Waterloo...or at least it's not any Waterloo I've ever seen...

Scooby_Doo · **Reply #27 on:** October 04, 2006, 04:14:23 am

Well it's not canon, more homage

Scooby_Doo · **Reply #28 on:** October 05, 2006, 01:40:30 am

I still need to convert the ferret mk2 over to cob.. and now the Galaxy heavy bomber is ready to be painted...

Who wants to paint this for me?.............................................................. ..........................I didn't think so

It's 50meters long (isn't this one of the biggest bombers around including inferno?)
I thought the devestator was 50m so i based this off that scale... unforunatelly the devestator seems to be only 36m. Maybe a gunship armed with torps?

Scooby_Doo · **Reply #29 on:** October 05, 2006, 03:48:14 am

gevatter Lars · **Reply #30 on:** October 05, 2006, 01:17:49 pm

For most of it I like the new Waterloo design.
Some changes I would suggest is removing the lower outer fins so that you have just two pairs of fins.
Also somehow this reminds me of a klingon/romulan vessel with the PTC under it. Maybe you could change the design of it a little. While the rest of the ship is quite blocky the PTC is quite round. Maybe you could try a more "technical" style on it. Means make it a little bit more blocky and add some of the structurs you have on the upper part to "hold" the PTC.
I would also suggest to make the upper fins a little bit sleeker and give the hangar for the fighters their "cover" as the old version had it...I allways found that a good part of it.

Scooby_Doo · **Reply #31 on:** October 06, 2006, 03:49:58 am

Agreed on the front rounded area.... besides 3dsmax doesn't seem to want to shine it correctly. The wings come right off my Aurora cruiser.

How about a Sartha?

Too much smoothing, especially on the hull

Starman01 · **Reply #32 on:** October 08, 2006, 04:49:51 am

I really like the new waterloo design (except for the upper bridgepart that is). With a few more greeblings I would say you managed to WC3ish one of those awful WC2 designs

Colonol Dekker · **Reply #33 on:** October 09, 2006, 06:47:50 am

Awful WC2...................

How dare you, The concordia is a work of art...................Waterloo looks perfect, and as for the submarine of mystery i have no clue what its based off..

gevatter Lars · **Reply #34 on:** October 09, 2006, 12:50:18 pm

I also don't like the bloober look of WC2. It dosn't fit so well to the rest of the ships. WC2 designs where like someone invented the sphere and everyone had to use it on every ship.
Confedships are mostly ok, but the Kilrathis where all very round and that dosn't fit to the Kilarthi as I think of them...or their ship design.

Colonol Dekker · **Reply #35 on:** October 10, 2006, 05:53:32 am

WC3 Kilrathi are the best in every way, but give WC1-2 era ships wc3/4 textures and they look great as Scoob has shown.

gevatter Lars · **Reply #36 on:** October 10, 2006, 08:02:28 am

That might be true for the Confed ships of WC2 but the Kilrathis are just to round. The Waterloo as Scooby has build it is quite close to what I would imagne the ship when it was used in WC3...well with less details since the WC3 engine insnt that powerfull.

Colonol Dekker · **Reply #37 on:** October 10, 2006, 08:05:12 am

I concur most definately, as above the WC3/4 Cats are how cats should be, But WC2 ships are more human than giant space lego IMO. Although the Victory and Behemoth are teh secks.

*cough* scuse the noobism........

Scooby_Doo · **Reply #38 on:** October 10, 2006, 04:56:02 pm

Heres some more stuff that will eventually get done

Liberty pocket carrier (was a p2 destroyer/cruiser)

Raksa'Darg heavy destroyer

Karenen (p2 karenen) rechristened as a bomber

Enterprise fleet carrier (Axem's triton model part) (UV'ed and ready to be painted)

I've finally got Lar's Gladius uv mapped.

I still need to release Lar's Ra'toth model, I think it's ready to go, just let me double check.

Colonol Dekker · **Reply #39 on:** October 11, 2006, 06:43:39 am

Quality stuff. The liberty brings back memories of Ser whatsisname and nipping about getting smacked by the bloody military

News:

Author Topic: A couple more ships (Read 7137 times)

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships

Re: A couple more ships