[Kazan]

Please remove the bible reference from my title - you know damn well i'm an Anti-theist atheist and that having a bible verse as my title would be offensive to me.

It's a good thing that I talked to sandwich before posting because I thought it was a pro-circ verse at first from the poor translation and therefore a passive-aggressive attack on my position and I was significantly more angered than I am now.

[Turambar]

dude wtf

why'd they put it there?

[Ford Prefect]

Well, if that's how it's going to be, I think it's only fair that whoever did this should have section 125 of The Gay Science under their name.

[NGTM-1R]

Tough ****, son?

It is their forum, and you do use it at their sufferance.

[Admiral Nelson]

Beware of dog.

[vyper]

Interesting, they're quoting a religious line supporting you... I am intrigued.

[Kazan]

Tough ****, son?

It is their forum, and you do use it at their sufferance.

nobody asked your opinion pissant

[achtung]

Wow, someone takes way too much offense to simple ****.  I wouldn't really care if I was given an anti-theist or pro-theist title.

[Kazan]

well you're not an antitheist who (rightly) credits religion with the mutilation of his body, the supression of his rights and the supression of freedom being given a patently religious title

[Deepblue]

Yeah, I'd take that title over what I have now...

[achtung]

1Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe.

 2Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.

 3For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.

4Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:

 5Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee; 

lol!

[aldo_14]

<< Is amused.

[Kazan]

"the circumcision" was a way to refer to jews

[redmenace]

Tough ****, son?

It is their forum, and you do use it at their sufferance.

nobody asked your opinion pissant

Maybe if you wouldn't go around acting as such, the admins wouldn't see fit to make a laughing stock out of you.

And don't think that your political convictions don't ever infringe on the rights of others.

[Kazan]

Maybe if you wouldn't go around acting as such, the admins wouldn't see fit to make a laughing stock out of you.

**** you asswipe, just because I hold to my convictions and I can DEFEND them doesn't make me a laughing stock, except perhaps in the minds of weakminded fools who couldn't argue their way out of a wet paper bag

And don't think that your political convictions don't ever infringe on the rights of others.

oh puh-leeze... point out one political view I hold that infringes on a protected exercise of a anyones rights


oh.. that's right - YOU CAN'T!

[Blue Lion]

This is pretty fun to watch

[Ford Prefect]

**** you asswipe, just because I hold to my convictions and I can DEFEND them doesn't make me a laughing stock, except perhaps in the minds of weakminded fools who couldn't argue their way out of a wet paper bag

I tried to argue my way out of a wet paper bag once, but it cornered me with deductive reasoning and then invoked the Categorical Imperative. I was forced to concede. It was humiliating.

Anyway, where was I? Oh yeah, don't judge until you've tried it.

[achtung]

oh puh-leeze... point out one political view I hold that infringes on a protected exercise of a anyones rights


oh.. that's right - YOU CAN'T!

You argue with anyone that doesn't agree with you to the point of stupidity, and try to force an opinion on them.  An example actually being the circumcision thread you started.

[Kazan]

**** you asswipe, just because I hold to my convictions and I can DEFEND them doesn't make me a laughing stock, except perhaps in the minds of weakminded fools who couldn't argue their way out of a wet paper bag

I tried to argue my way out of a wet paper bag once, but it cornered me with deductive reasoning and then invoked the Categorical Imperative. I was forced to concede. It was humiliating.

Anyway, where was I? Oh yeah, don't judge until you've tried it.

lol

[Kazan]

oh puh-leeze... point out one political view I hold that infringes on a protected exercise of a anyones rights


oh.. that's right - YOU CAN'T!

You argue with anyone that doesn't agree with you to the point of stupidity, and try to force an opinion on them.  An example actually being the circumcision thread you started.

arguing with someone is not "forcing" an opinion on them, legislating it is.

and enforcing the protection of one right (bodily integrity) cannot infringe upon a protected exercise of another right since the exercise of that second right is violation the first right!

look up rights v license.