Your post doesn't change a lot since what I say comes from Scientists who simply said that many of the restrictions applied to hunting are unfair,that hunting isn't responsable of drammatci reduction of birds,ecc
You may not now this,but some Ambientalists(not Animalists)have started a period ofcollaboration with hunter association, saying that they both have knowledge of things most of the humanity ignore.
what the **** are you trying to say
seriously
OK, I state this one more time.
YOU make a claim.
I question that claim.
YOU are to prove your claim.
DO THIS. Shuddup about weird words you make up and stop using association fallacy (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy) and
give
me
the
source
Since you are trying to base your argument around it (argument seems to be fallacious too but whatever).
You can stay sat in a office 24 hours per day,you can pass your life in a city,but this doesn't allow you to say things far lightyears from the truth(it isn't referenced to someone in particular).
you so silly, you italian, italians always wrong

Do you know what ad homimen means? Are you seriously suggesting that because someone does not live in wherever you happen to live then he cannot talk about something you are talking about? Seriously, is this what you are saying? Instead of trying to engage in factual discussion we should use person's COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT IRL CREDENTIALS to judge the merit of their posts?
Get the hell out of HLP discussions and never come back.