Author Topic: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)  (Read 20431 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Deepblue

  • Corporate Shill
  • 210
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
1. They're only showing it once.
2. Your right, it is an advertisement. But again it demonstrates elements that will be in the game, hence the excitement. Like I said, I don't expect you to get it. For the majority of people, it's simply a reminder that Halo 3 is coming. For the Halo fan base, it means a LOT more.
3. Instead of griping about posting game-related content in the "Games and Gaming" forum why don't you go elsewhere?
« Last Edit: December 05, 2006, 04:54:02 pm by Deepblue »

 

Offline Deepblue

  • Corporate Shill
  • 210
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
Quote
The kids are CG... or the image has been edited in a bizarre way.
Polar Express style imaging? or pure CG.

The official word:

"They lit it like that so that the transition to the second half wouldn't be too jarring, but it's amazing how many people have decided those kids are CG. Somebody said they got Polar Expressed."

 

Offline Ghostavo

  • 210
  • Let it be glue!
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
Not that I don't trust you or anything, but mind giving a link? I'm curious where you got that, I searched both Bungie and DigitalDomain's site and found nothing.
"Closing the Box" - a campaign in the making :nervous:

Shrike is a dirty dirty admin, he's the destroyer of souls... oh god, let it be glue...

 

Offline Deepblue

  • Corporate Shill
  • 210
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5024554&postcount=600

Stinkles = Frankie - Bungie's community guy - regularly posts.

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
1. They're only showing it once.
2. Your right, it is an advertisement. But again it demonstrates elements that will be in the game, hence the excitement. Like I said, I don't expect you to get it. For the majority of people, it's simply a reminder that Halo 3 is coming. For the Halo fan base, it means a LOT more.
3. Instead of griping about posting game-related content in the "Games and Gaming" forum why don't you go elsewhere?

1/And it's been completely hidden since then.....what's your point, caller?

2/So should I post the next CGI trailer for a Brothers In Arms, etc, game and cite it as some wonderful thing?  Are we to expect a new thread every time a tiny piece of news comes out (if you can call an advert 'news')?  Christ, I'm glad we didn't use that procedure for Stalker or something.

3/I don't want to encourage this trend of not just putting CGI as game ads, but more importantly also of putting it up here for no good reason beyond advertising the advert.  It's a game advert, fine.  But it doesn't show the game, or game-playing (commonly shortened to 'gaming').  I'd rather not have this forum clogged up with new threads for every new advert released, thankyouverymuch.  Moreso, since when is negative comment to be removed from games and gaming - is this for all games, or is it only Halo criticism you wish removed? (gee, let me think)

Ah, neoGaf.  I thought I recognised your name on a Red Steel thread there... with the only comments being to say how much better the Halo music was.  Hmm.  Odd, that.

 

Offline Deepblue

  • Corporate Shill
  • 210
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
 :wtf: Is there not a link to the vid in the first post?

Are you always such a cynic?

But enough with the personal attacks. I reiterate, if the subject matter of this thread does not interest you, and your sole purpose in posting is to troll, why not leave?

P.S. I also cited Total Annihilation as something with better music.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2006, 11:31:44 pm by Deepblue »

 

Offline bloated

  • 27
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
Quote
For the Halo fan base, it means a LOT more.
3. Instead of griping about posting game-related content in the "Games and Gaming" forum why don't you go elsewhere?
I'm not picking sides or anything but let's all get some perspective here for just a moment.

1 I've read all the Halo books, I bought my Xbox solely to play Halo and Halo 2 and I will likely be buying my Xbox 360 when Halo 3 comes out only to play Halo 3 so I suspect that I could be considered by some to be a member of the Halo Fanbase and to be solidly honest the advertisement was worthless.

it didn't show any in game footage so it had nothing to offer in the way of actual changes made in the game beyond the silly shield grenade...... and possibly a return of the MA5B assault rifle which would be a welcome addition but I wouldn't count on it given it was abandoned in Halo 2.

as a side note the inclusion of the Shield grenade in the video could be an example of some savvy test marketing with Bungie or MS employee's monitoring the forums to see how it was recieved.

as for the comment "if you plan on being negative then leave" let's just forget it was ever mentioned.

 
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
if you got in on the beta you'd have most of your answers, and, gee, they're looking for beta testers...


I'm just surprised no one commented

 

Offline Deepblue

  • Corporate Shill
  • 210
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
But will the X-button function be part of the beta? I'd think it would have to be for them to effectively beta the game.

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
:wtf: Is there not a link to the vid in the first post?

Are you always such a cynic?

But enough with the personal attacks. I reiterate, if the subject matter of this thread does not interest you, and your sole purpose in posting is to troll, why not leave?

P.S. I also cited Total Annihilation as something with better music.

Since when did honest-if-perhaps-vitriolic (vitriol increasing with quantity, y'see) criticism become trolling?  If you don't want any criticism of putting up a Halo cgi advert as the best thing since sliced bread, find a bungie forum or something.

On the subject of the Red Steel music thingy - and I really hate having to go back and do this (albeit do you even own said game?  Isn't it trolling by your definition to criticise a game?);

Quote
I must have been spoiled by Marty, because I don't think that's anything special.

It's quality sure, but it lacks that extra something. It doesn't stick with you like say, the Halo theme and the many variations thereof do.

I still don't find it "amazing," but hey, whatever suits you.

amazing what you find when you go through a random link to see feedback for a game......

But will the X-button function be part of the beta? I'd think it would have to be for them to effectively beta the game.

Of course it'll be there - it can't be a beta if you can't actually test the whole thing.

 

Offline Roanoke

  • 210
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
Why reinstate the Assault Rifle ? Using that thing was just plain torture. The Battlefield Rifle was much better, though they wouldn't let you carry anywhere near enough ammo.

 

Offline Turnsky

  • FOXFIRE Artisté
  • 211
  • huh?.. Who?.. hey you kids, git off me lawn!
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
Why reinstate the Assault Rifle ? Using that thing was just plain torture. The Battlefield Rifle was much better, though they wouldn't let you carry anywhere near enough ammo.

they said it's not quite the same assault rifle of old... they're really candid about its capabilities.
   //Warning\\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
do not torment the sleep deprived artist, he may be vicious when cornered,
in case of emergency, administer caffeine to the artist,
he will become docile after that,
and less likely to stab you in the eye with a mechanical pencil
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Offline Maxwell

  • 25
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
With real guns, an assault rifle and a battle rifle are two different beasts. Currently the big guns don't have much favor with military planners. They've been all but phased out these days except for a few roles.

What I'm thinking is that the battle rifle might have been the newer weapon here. Harder to come by for anyone operating in deep space and cutoff from the normal supply line. Everything you have in halo 1 came from reach or the pillar of autumns hold (lord knows when was the last time they resupplied from earth).
Halo2 is on earth some time later, where the standards may have been changing.

This second video, to me, seems like its taking place on reach. I wonder why he'd be there since we left him on earth... but if he is there then thats the weapon and ammo you'd have available.

If the last place he gets supplies between halo2 and 3 is from there, he would still have it on earth when the Africa cutscene is taking place.

Just a guess.

 

Offline bloated

  • 27
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
the battle rifle was way way over powered in the 2nd halo on a level equivalent to that stupid scoped pistol, I liked the battle rifle but more ammo less damage would have been better.

Halo while an excellent game could easily be made better simply by making some weapons more specific, IE elites have shields making the battle rifle almost worthless but against jackals devastating, and against Elites a standard assault rifle is more effective.... Bungie should seriously look into it.

as for the MA5B I absolutely loved that weapon, huge clip fast firing rate and devastating up close truly a beautiful weapon uber fun to use.

on legendary I'd run straight at an Elite spraying a full clip into him as I side stepped and just as the clip emptied give him a whack to the back of the head ....... "flawless victory".

additionally I felt the MA5B was more indicative of the reality that the Covenant were supposed to be 300 years more advanced giving them a bit of an edge in regards to their shields...... if terrans are 300 years behind in technology it seems kinda stupid that a simple machine gun will slice through their body armor faster than it doese against generic body armor available today.

and I can't say enough bad about that stupid pistol in the first Halo I used it a few times and felt like I was cheating it was so overpowered.  after that I simply dropped it and used the "inferior" covenant weapons that were only 300 years more advanced.

balance was a real problem in Halo and Halo 2 especially in multi player where tanks were taken out by sniper rifles.  hopefully it will be addressed in Halo 3 a little better.

 

Offline Deepblue

  • Corporate Shill
  • 210
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
The idea that the Covenant weapons were less powerful is absolutely incorrect. You just can't use them like you use human weapons.

I'll take a plasma rifle over an assualt rifle any day.

 

Offline Maxwell

  • 25
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
If I understand the story right, the covenant just had better stuff from the outset, not that they developed faster or sooner.
They don't seem to own anything they did not steal from another race.  Which means while they possess some advanced kit, they might not know the full details of how it works or adapting it to stop odd ballistic weapons.
Its a similar problem for humans who, despite having much covenant junk lying around to study, have not adapted it into our standard arms.
Both sets of weapons seem pretty lethal, just different.

 

Offline bloated

  • 27
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
Quote
The idea that the Covenant weapons were less powerful is absolutely incorrect.
give me a break.

first the Covenant didn't get any answer to the human sniper rifle or even a scoped pistol until Halo 2 both weapons were vastly superior to anything the Covenant had as demonstrated by the Covenant when they couldn't even return fire at range..... 4 shots dropped an elite 1 headshot on a grunt and 1 backshot on a brute easily done with the sniper rifle...... 10-12 shots dropped an elite 1-2 headshots on a grunt and 1 backshot on a brute easily done with the scope on the pistol all the while they were either totally inaccurate or couldn't return fire at all...... and the game allowed the player to hold 120 rounds of pistol ammo to boot!!!!

the Covenant weapons lacked range, their was a lag time involved in their shots making them easily avoidable even at medium range, pick any Covenant weapon in Halo 1 and you would lose against any terran save the MA5B which would be relatively equal at short to medium range, yes without a doubt the Elite plasma rifle was pretty good at medium and up close but medium to long all of their weapons were worthless.

and for fun let's talk about the Covenant tank or the Covenant gun emplacements..... both virtually worthless peices of garbage that was compared to the human tank by any measure.... slow rate of fire, slow rate of speed for the tank easily avoidable, as for the gun emplacement 1 headshot with the sniper rifle dropped the gunner and it's fire was inaccurate and apparently they can't see far with it both easy to take down by tank, jeep and for the gun amplacement with the sniper rifle, the pistol and or a plasma rifle.

Covenant banshees were kinda good but you never saw the Banshee pilots using the 2ndary weapon in Halo 1 that was saved for the gamer.

let's examine Halo 2.

pistol bacame as pathetic as it always should have been, the sniper and assault rifle were as devastating again especially at range and the only answer was the Covenant sniper rifle which was prone to overheating and ammo shortages and because Bungie wanted to embrace the idea of dual weilding weapons the Plasma rifle was weakened and offered up in 2 variants, one had a slow firing rate the other less accurate and prone to overheating...... also the human rocket launcher in both Halo 1 and 2 was superior to the covenant equivalent although the covenant carried more ammo but less accurate and less punch.

I liked Halo and preferred it over Halo 2 because by simply dropping the stupid over-powered pistol at least I didn't feel like I was cheating and the game required some skill on legendary level.
Quote
If I understand the story right, the covenant just had better stuff from the outset, not that they developed faster or sooner.
you don't understand right, according to the storyline the Covenant are 300 years more advanced.

both sets of weapons are neat in their own way and personally I liked the plasma rifle in Halo 1 but that's only because I'm an up close brawler so the MA5B and Plasma rifle suited my style......but in Halo 1 the human sniper rifle the shoulder mounted rocket launcher and scoped pistol were vastly superior to anything the covenant had as was the tank without question.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2006, 11:59:40 pm by bloated »

 

Offline Kaboodles

  • 26
  • Kill the meat. Save the metal.
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
See, there's this thing called game balance.  It would really kinda suck to play a game which was impossible to win.  Covenant weapons were more powerful against shields, but weaker against armor/flesh.  I mean, if all of their weapons were vastly superior to our own, then there really wouldn't be any reason to keep your assault rifle or pistol.

Anyways, the covenant did use the fuel rod gun in their banshees.   I can personally attest to this, as I distinctly remember getting blasted out of my hog while looking for lifeboats on Legendary.  That was annoying.

  

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
I thought the Halo (1) assault rifle was a bit weedy, myself; I'd drop it as soon as I got something like a Covvie pistol.  It was fairly useful against the wee Flood, though, from what I remember.

 

Offline Mefustae

  • 210
  • Chevron locked...
Re: Halo 3 Teaser (CG/live action)
It was fairly useful against the wee Flood, though, from what I remember.
Indeed. Assault Rifle & Shotty duo would mow through all things Flood like a hot knife through margarine.