[Flipside]

US can do better....

http://baltimorechronicle.com/2007/011907Parry.shtml

US attorney General Alberto Gonzales actually had the audacity to argue before a Congressional committee that the US Constitution doesn't explicitly bestow habeas corpus rights on US citizens. In his view it merely says when the so-called Great Writ can be suspended, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the rights are granted.

Pinched from Warpstorm btw

[Unknown Target]

I saw that. He's not going to have a job after this one

[Flipside]

LOL I certainly hope so, he might as well have said 'Hey, I preferred it when the British were in charge, let's have another civil war!'.

[Blue Lion]

Just because it says you can remove it, doesn't mean you had it, right?

[redmenace]

It doesn't explicetly, but yes it is clearly implied.

[Mr. Vega]

Is there any chance that intentional subversion of civil rights can be considered treason in US law?

[Ford Prefect]

To quote Stephen Colbert roughly, "It's as if they're holding these truths to be self-evident."

[Rictor]

“You may be treading on your interdiction of violating common sense,” Specter said."

Translated that means: "You don't know what the **** you're talking about newb".

[Janos]

Is there any chance that intentional subversion of civil rights can be considered treason in US law?

No.