To review the laws of the legislative branch while checking the balance of power, and to provide a set of principles on which a democratic state (with bigger fish to fry) shall be governed. Respectively, of course.
Why are they independent?
To avoid being bullied around by the Executive and Legislative branches into reviewing legislation in their favor, though some could argue courtstacking has this same effect. Or to not have judges as legislators as well (I'm looking at
you, Westminster parliamentary systems).
Oh, and kudos to Goob for mentioning the Bill of Rights.
I mean our charter of rights and freedoms...its not there as far as I can remember.
Actually, you guys do:
Section 26
The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights or freedoms that exist in Canada.
Since the Charter is included in the Constitution, I guess it would mean something.
I mean our charter of rights and freedoms...its not there as far as I can remember. I don't know the American one nearly as well. Still...we have more rights and freedoms than you guys do these days.
I didn't realize that the American one has those lines at all. Somewhat encouraging if anyone paid attention to them.
I'm sure they'll be amended out soon.
Over my and any other fairly educated American's dead body.