Thank you all for your responses to my tinyesque query.
While I appreciate the effort(s) and the time that has gone into making PCS2 a fine piece of coded instructions, I believe it's time for a verbose response
a la Selectah:
Mate, are you even fully reading these responses?
Yes, I am. I am literate and I possess the mental faculties required to both internalize and ameliorate the denotative semiosis of the replies.
PCS2 is better than Aurora.
What "better" means in any given context is subjective and thus governed by both value theory and the pragmatic maxim. When stating "PCS2 is
better than Aurora", you -- dear Vasudan Admiral -- are not presenting any meter by which to judge this subjective "betterness". What I am left with is simply an axiom: "[the presented instant] is better [by arbitrary evaluation] than [any other instant]". This, I gather you agree, does not help me. At all.
When I've tried to use PCS2 on my current rig, the performance of the software is slow to the point of being non-functional for the purposes I employed it for; mainly writing down the data of the given model. Nothing more, nothing less.
Is it the 3d render window that is slow?
Slower than GWB's brain.
Is it that all the buttons respond slowly?
Those are just fine.
Does it happen even before a model is loaded?
Nope.
If not, what model are you loading that causes it?
Any and all.
What you're currently doing - by using Aurora and completely ignoring PCS2, means 1) no-one gets the problem fixed,
I quite sincerely believe I must be in the absolute minority in the FS community demographics. I'm using (subjectively) old gear -- what with 266 MHz CPU's, 8 MB Voodoo cards from the 90's, etc, etc -- and I'm of the opinion that hardware limitations should dictate the functionality, not software needs. Et cetera. Meaning, of course, if it doesn't work on a (say) 800 MHz rig w/ 16 MB of GFX RAM, it's no longer interesting to me.
I am a luddite, I am. Pertinacious. Stubborn. Mulish. Hardheaded. Obstinate.
2) you yourself don't get the power and features of PCS2 and
I seemingly have no need for all the functionality imbedded into that fine piece of code.
3) you're indirectly insulting PCS2 by implying that it's not worth the small effort it would take to give a proper bug report.
While I can appreciate your stance, suffice it to say that you and I have remarkedly different concepts regarding insults.
It's silly!
I hear you.
Sorry to sound like this, but I do feel quite strongly about this kinda thing with open source stuff
Noted. I do not for a second doubt your veracity.
please post something more descriptive here or in Mantis so the issue can be addressed?
The issue is probably one of having a not-up-to-speed rig (see above).
If I recall correctly, I only asked for a file. That's all I did. How that can be construed as insulting a community, is beyond me.
It doesn't take much and could end up benefiting everyone.
I understand your point of view. However, please do not doubt
my veracity when I for the record state that solving any and all of my "problems" would hardly do the community any good. I sincerely believe those efforts are better focused elsewhere. The community has done -- and continue to do -- a brilliant job with the FreeSpaceOpen project. The on-going efforts to bring all players, within or outside the community, the absolutely finest SciFi simulation experience is an endeavour worthy of applause and recognition, and is yet another testament to human perseverance. You are the best of the best, the
creme de la creme. Keep up the brilliant work.
In humble admiration,
~Selectah