Author Topic: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow  (Read 80451 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
Gotcha, I always triangulate anyway because some programs can be stroppy about symmetry when triangulating, so you have to 'intervene' a little bit. For example, Lightwave works by vertex, it always triangulates clockwise, regardless of what side of the axis it is on. This means that on a model that is symmetrical if you have a 4-sided non-flat poly, on both sides, they will both be divided diagonally left-right, which means they are no longer symmetrical, and look rather odd.

 

Offline Water

  • 210
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
Ok - so how long is this ship supposed to be?
« Last Edit: June 16, 2008, 07:26:12 am by Water »

 

Offline Vasudan Admiral

  • Member
  • 211
    • Twisted Infinities
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
Hmm, good question. From those pics I would say the 1000m one, but I usually base the specific length on window features if I can. IIRC, the bridge has a window recess that you could use, or maybe the rounded front 'observation deck' kinda thing. The Fenris windows are a good reference size - I'd consider them to be about 2m or so high.

I still don't much like the front TBH. It feels....out of sync with the overall shape somehow. I can't think of any shape that would work better though. :\
Get the 2014 Media VPs and report any bugs you find in them to the FSU Mantis so that we may squish them. || Blender to POF model conversion guide
Twisted Infinities

 

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • 213
  • /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
I think that it looks awesome in its 1km state.
(´・ω・`)
=============================================================

 
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
definately go with 1km

 

Offline Davin

  • 26
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
Definitely 1km, I can't wait to see this thing in game.

 

Offline Polpolion

  • The sizzle, it thinks!
  • 211
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
1000m frigate, totally.

  

Offline Water

  • 210
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
Looks like 1000m it is.

The model has been stable for six months, and with the exception of turrets I think the modeling part is complete.

On to Stage 2 - UV mapping. I've started the basic unwrap. Aiming for 2x20482

 

Offline blowfish

  • 211
  • Join the cult of KILL MY ROUTER!!!!!!!!!!1
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
Is all of the geometry stable?

EDIT: And don't forget about turrets!
« Last Edit: June 17, 2008, 09:16:04 pm by blowfish »

 

Offline Water

  • 210
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
Is all of the geometry stable?

EDIT: And don't forget about turrets!
The geometry of ver7b was pretty good. Very little needed to be fixed. I think someone may be working on some turrets.

 

Offline blowfish

  • 211
  • Join the cult of KILL MY ROUTER!!!!!!!!!!1
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
K.  Just wanted to make sure ;)

 
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
Make it GTFf Moscow then: it would be larger than the Iceni.

 

Offline Snail

  • SC 5
  • 214
  • Posts: ☂
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
Why GTFf?

 
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
That's the fanon designation for a frigate IIRC.

 

Offline Snail

  • SC 5
  • 214
  • Posts: ☂
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
Only in Derelict.

 

Offline colecampbell666

  • I See Dead Pictures
  • 212
  • Evolution and ascension.
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
Fg sounds better.

But Ff is the military designation.

I personally like the 500m version, but that's probably cause it looks sorta like a fighter from that angle. Or something from B5.
Gettin' back to dodgin' lasers.

 

Offline Topgun

  • 210
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
1000m and somebody uv it.

 

Offline colecampbell666

  • I See Dead Pictures
  • 212
  • Evolution and ascension.
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
Looks like 1000m it is.

The model has been stable for six months, and with the exception of turrets I think the modeling part is complete.

On to Stage 2 - UV mapping. I've started the basic unwrap. Aiming for 2x20482

Gettin' back to dodgin' lasers.

 

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • 213
  • /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
I would use Fg for frigate still...can't wait to see this thing done and ready to kick ass.
(´・ω・`)
=============================================================

 

Offline Rico

Re: Cumulative Modelling – the GTCv Moscow
I hope its textured similar to the Colossus and Sirona, the GTVA 'hybrid' vessels  :drevil:, damn beautiful model tho  ;7