Author Topic: Time Machine - Possible?  (Read 3763 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline achtung

  • Friendly Neighborhood Mirror Guy
  • 210
  • ****in' Ace
    • Freespacemods.net
Time Machine - Possible?
YouTube - Excerpt from documentary

Ronald Mallett's Site

It may be old news but what are your opinions?

I think it's very interesting, if it's possible.
FreeSpaceMods.net | FatHax | ??????
In the wise words of Charles de Gaulle, "China is a big country, inhabited by many Chinese."

Formerly known as Swantz

 

Offline Herra Tohtori

  • The Academic
  • 211
  • Bad command or file name
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
Light, bending space enough to make it actually swirl around? :wtf:

I don't claim to have the necessary understanding of general theory of relativity when it comes to field equations, but I always thought that relative energy didn't have actual effect on space-time curvature*, and since photons are nothing but relative energy I kinda have my doubts on this interpretation... since the photons have no possible rest stage, they can be considered as pure kinetic energy in the same regard that when objects with a rest mass go faster and faster, they do not collapse into black holes no matter how fast they go.

Although I'm not sure how a continuous beam of light would affect space-time, since it could be viewed as a bar of static energy density... but on the other hand it's still made of photons.

It kinda boils down to the question whether photons just move according to space's curvature along the geodetic straight line, or do they in their part affect the space-time. My intuition would be to say no, they don't affect the curvature of space and time and they just go along, but intuiton is worth nothing in physics. It'd be interesting to see other opinions of that guy's interpretations, but I can't really bother to go and search for them.

The idea about achieving seemingly faster than light movement while moving at sublight speeds in local space-time sounds very plausible - in fact the universe is kinda doing it all the time, that's the reason why the night sky is not as bright as sun - but in that case it's the expansion of the universe which at some point starts making distance between objects and us faster than light can travel, which creates an event horizon of kinds. But interpreting how it would affect time for the object/photon sent into twirling space is a whole another can of worm(hole)s in itself.

For example, if we take an observation point A on geostationary orbit around a black hole, and assume that they send a photon on an interesting trajectory around the black hole, into the swirling space so that it will eventually return to point A, it still won't return to point A before it was sent. It still travels the only path it can at velocity c. The fact that the space around the black hole is so twisted that even catholic priests would be strained by it (into several kilometres long molecular spaghetti threads before being overheated into plasma) doesn't really change the fact that time doesn't go backwards, it only goes forward - although it can stop like it does in event horizon of black holes, from the outside that is.

Even if you take an observation point B opposite to point A and send a photon from A to B so that it travels through swirling time-space close to the event horizon... it will still be the fastest way to contact B from A's location. The fact that the photon's relative velocity in regard to both A and B during it's trip is something else than c due to the fact that the space-time in between moves to some direction doesn't really affect the observers one way or another.

At least that's my interpretation of the matter...


So what gives? I think that probably the only way to time travel is some kind of stasis system which either stops or slows entropia changes in a system, or truly stops or slows the flow of time by stretching time-space. This would cause the effect of traveling to the future, although it would be impossible to get back.

Perhaps the hypothetically most intriguing while physically even remotely plausible time travel method is a combination of a wormhole and a stasis field. The other end of the wormhole would be put into a true stasis field, which would slow the time flow on that end, while the other end would remain put at arbitrary location in normal time flow. This would after some time create a time difference between the ends of the wormhole while being connected to each other, so hypothetically it would then be possible to move from one end to the other.

It would then even be possible to travel from the future into the time when the wormhole was created. But seeing how getting anything of any importance through a wormhole (not to mention making a stable wormhole in the first place) is purely academic question, even this possibility kinda loses it's appeal. :blah:


*actually my vague understanding is that relative energy does affect the energy tensor calculations, but in some point of co-ordinate transformations the relative forms of energy will drop out of the equations when it comes to calculationg mass interactions like gravity, or somesuch smart stuff. Don't ask more, I can't answer... :p
There are three things that last forever: Abort, Retry, Fail - and the greatest of these is Fail.

  

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
I must admit, I find the concept of moving around in time very difficult to accept, I can deal with the idea of a difference in progression of Local Time and Perceptive time etc, so the idea that someone who travelled near the speed of light experience less 'time' than someone on a planet-surface, but to get to the point where you are actually going backwards in it? I know it can be done in theory, but personally I have a feeling Time Travel will be one of those things that happens in theory, but takes more energy than the Universe contains to achieve it or something.

It's kind of like Transporter Beams in Star Trek, with people's 'code' being loaded onto a computer and re-assembled on the pad, in theory it's possible, in practice, with current or even forseeable technologies, it'd take millions of years to transmit the complete information on a single human being, since you would have to record the position, speed etc of every single neuron in the brain.

 

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
IMHO, I think it's impossible for once simple reason.

Time & space are connected, right? Moving trough space you are aslo moving trough time...allways forward.

Since there is no negative speed, you can only go forward in time, at a specific pace.
Thus instant "jumps" are not possible, the transitions are gradual.
Traveling BACK in time is flat-out impossible.

At least that's how  Isee it. :blah:
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
I don't know if it's possible and to be honest i don't want to know it. It would cause too much trouble if you could travel through time.
Possible: Maybe
Good: I don't  think so
Lead me, follow me, or get the hell out of my way!!

 

Offline Hellstryker

  • waffles
  • 210
    • Skype
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
I've got to agree with steel on that one >_> However i do not think time travel backwards would be posible as herra stated

 
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
        I don't think that backwards time travel is possible, for most of the reasons Herra Tohtori has posted (darn you for taking those ideas straight from my head.... yeah right). Perhaps travel to the future is possible, or the total perspective stopping of time, but the energy required to go back in time doesn't exist in the past. It's like a teleporter. Theoretically, you can't teleport for the simple fact that the required elements/energy does not exist in the area you want to teleport to, it only exists where you are at a certain point in time. Perhaps it is possible to stop time, but that's a different theory altogether.

    |[===---(-         
    ||
 =(||==)_
    ||_____|
 =(||==)
    ||                   
    |[===---(-                             

"Take my love. Take my land. Take me where I cannot stand. I don't care, I'm still free. You can't take the sky from me. Take me out to the black, tell them I ain't comin' back. Burn the land boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me. There's no place I can be since I've found Serenity. But you can't take the sky from me." - Ballad of Serenity

 

Offline achtung

  • Friendly Neighborhood Mirror Guy
  • 210
  • ****in' Ace
    • Freespacemods.net
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
This man is proposing travel to the future, not back.

He's proposing travel forward until the machine is deactivated in the future, or back, to when it was first activated.

Not before it was activated, or after it's deactivated.

He's not proposing sending people either, only communications or small particles.
FreeSpaceMods.net | FatHax | ??????
In the wise words of Charles de Gaulle, "China is a big country, inhabited by many Chinese."

Formerly known as Swantz

 
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
This man is proposing travel to the future, not back.


Wrong. Listen to it again. This physicist says that time travel backwards is only possible while the portal is open

Quote from: Swantz

He's proposing travel forward until the machine is deactivated in the future, or back, to when it was first activated.

Not before it was activated, or after it's deactivated.

Wrong again. See above argument.

Quote from: Swantz

He's not proposing sending people either, only communications or small particles.

Wrong yet again. He said information could be sent to the past. Which form of passing information is conjecture.

    |[===---(-         
    ||
 =(||==)_
    ||_____|
 =(||==)
    ||                   
    |[===---(-                             

"Take my love. Take my land. Take me where I cannot stand. I don't care, I'm still free. You can't take the sky from me. Take me out to the black, tell them I ain't comin' back. Burn the land boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me. There's no place I can be since I've found Serenity. But you can't take the sky from me." - Ballad of Serenity

 

Offline achtung

  • Friendly Neighborhood Mirror Guy
  • 210
  • ****in' Ace
    • Freespacemods.net
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
This man is proposing travel to the future, not back.


Wrong. Listen to it again. This physicist says that time travel backwards is only possible while the portal is open

Quote from: Swantz

He's proposing travel forward until the machine is deactivated in the future, or back, to when it was first activated.

Not before it was activated, or after it's deactivated.

Wrong again. See above argument.

Quote from: Swantz

He's not proposing sending people either, only communications or small particles.

Wrong yet again. He said information could be sent to the past. Which form of passing information is conjecture.

The second quote explains the first in those terms.  You can only travel within the time period in which the machine is active.  You can go back to the instant it is activated, or the moment before it's deactivated.  You can not go to any other period.  When I say the machine is activated, I mean the portal is open, when I say it's deactivated, I mean the portal is closed.

He mentions something about receiving particles of future experiments in the YouTube video.

I don't think you took the time to read what I said very well.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2007, 09:13:15 pm by Swantz »
FreeSpaceMods.net | FatHax | ??????
In the wise words of Charles de Gaulle, "China is a big country, inhabited by many Chinese."

Formerly known as Swantz

 

Offline Stealth

  • Braiiins...
  • 211
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
i'm pretty sure anything that makes its debut on YouTube.........

 

Offline Roanoke

  • 210
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
I know it can be done in theory, but personally I have a feeling Time Travel will be one of those things that happens in theory, but takes more energy than the Universe contains to achieve it or something.

bit more than a delorean can muster then ?  :p

 

Offline colecampbell666

  • I See Dead Pictures
  • 212
  • Evolution and ascension.
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
 :lol: I have to agree with Steel. What if you went back in time, and accidentally killed your parents?


I read somewhere that if you could take to ends of a black hole, twist the thing around, and go in one end, you'd come out the other end either forward or back in time.
Gettin' back to dodgin' lasers.

 

Offline Jeff Vader

  • The Back of the Hero!
  • 212
  • Bwahaha
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
Well one thing that we learned from Douglas Adams is that you can't mess time up or change the course of actions. No matter what you do, including but not limited to killing important political figures or becoming your own grandfather, everything that happened, happens or is going to happen, was going to do that in any case. If you traveld back in time, it just means that further ahead in the time-line your future self has already done it so you're just repeating that. Everything will get right eventually, so don't worry.
23:40 < achillion > EveningTea: ass
23:40 < achillion > wait no
23:40 < achillion > evilbagel: ass
23:40 < EveningTea > ?
23:40 < achillion > 2-letter tab complete failure

14:08 < achillion > there's too much talk of butts and dongs in here
14:08 < achillion > the level of discourse has really plummeted
14:08 < achillion > Let's talk about politics instead
14:08 <@The_E > butts and dongs are part of #hard-light's brand now
14:08 <@The_E > well
14:08 <@The_E > EvilBagel's brand, at least

01:06 < T-Rog > welp
01:07 < T-Rog > I've got to take some very strong antibiotics
01:07 < achillion > penis infection?
01:08 < T-Rog > Chlamydia
01:08 < achillion > O.o
01:09 < achillion > well
01:09 < achillion > I guess that happens
01:09 < T-Rog > at least it's curable
01:09 < achillion > yeah
01:10 < T-Rog > I take it you weren't actually expecting it to be a penis infection
01:10 < achillion > I was not

14:04 < achillion > Sometimes the way to simplify is to just have a habit and not think about it too much
14:05 < achillion > until stuff explodes
14:05 < achillion > then you start thinking about it

22:16 < T-Rog > I don't know how my gf would feel about Jewish conspiracy porn

15:41 <-INFO > EveningTea [[email protected]] has joined #hard-light
15:47 < EvilBagel> butt
15:51 < Achillion> yes
15:53 <-INFO > EveningTea [[email protected]] has quit [Quit: http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client]

18:53 < Achillion> Dicks are fun

21:41 < MatthTheGeek> you can't spell assassin without two asses

20:05 < sigtau> i'm mining titcoins from now on

00:31 < oldlaptop> Drunken antisocial educated freezing hicks with good Internet == Finland stereotype

11:46 <-INFO > Kobrar [[email protected]] has joined #hard-light
11:50 < achtung> Surely you've heard of DVDA
11:50 < achtung> Double Vaginal Double ANal
11:51 < Kobrar> ...
11:51 <-INFO > Kobrar [[email protected]] has left #hard-light []

 

Offline redsniper

  • 211
  • Aim for the Top!
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
^^ The real trouble with time travel is the grammar. :D
"Think about nice things not unhappy things.
The future makes happy, if you make it yourself.
No war; think about happy things."   -WouterSmitssm

Hard Light Productions:
"...this conversation is pointlessly confrontational."

 
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
Just no.

    |[===---(-         
    ||
 =(||==)_
    ||_____|
 =(||==)
    ||                   
    |[===---(-                             

"Take my love. Take my land. Take me where I cannot stand. I don't care, I'm still free. You can't take the sky from me. Take me out to the black, tell them I ain't comin' back. Burn the land boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me. There's no place I can be since I've found Serenity. But you can't take the sky from me." - Ballad of Serenity

 

Offline WeatherOp

  • 29
  • I forged the ban hammer. What about that?
    • http://www.geocities.com/weather_op/pageone.html?1113100476773
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
:lol: I have to agree with Steel. What if you went back in time, and accidentally killed your parents?


I read somewhere that if you could take to ends of a black hole, twist the thing around, and go in one end, you'd come out the other end either forward or back in time.

Now just thinking if you could do that. That is only the linear way of looking at it. If you go back in time and kill your parents, you never were.

But if you think about it, if you went back in time and killed your parents by something you did, you'd never be, but then you never being will mean you never went back in time to kill them in the first place, so they'd still be alive and so would you. :p
Decent Blacksmith, Master procrastinator.

PHD in the field of Almost Finishing Projects.

 

Offline Asuko

  • 27
  • Angel in conflict
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
In my opinion, I don't think you would be capable of creating a Grandfather Paradox. Maybe you'd spontaneously combust if you did something like that  :lol:
This sig is equal to -i.

Free Vasudans! Clicky here!!

Care to kill a flame war™?

"Is it just me or are the squirrels getting more and more waterlogged?" - Tyr

"THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU!" -Me
"Are you trying to exorcise my Rubik's cube?" -Tyrian

"Life's an adventure*plunge*" -Tyrian
"You call plunging a toilet an adventure?" -Me

 

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
Nah....the universe would implode. :lol:
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 

Offline Flaser

  • 210
  • man/fish warsie
Re: Time Machine - Possible?
1. Poul Anderson's version: the equations that describe something can have infinite breaks in it. In other words, you travel back you kill your grandparents. Your future self is never born it never exists, but the guy sent back in time without any whatsoever origin still exists.

2. There's a galactic cenzorship law that prevents paradoxons from forming.

3. Multiverse - each time the timeline is altered, the universe branches off with different result on different branches.
"I was going to become a speed dealer. If one stupid fairytale turns out to be total nonsense, what does the young man do? If you answered, “Wake up and face reality,” you don’t remember what it was like being a young man. You just go to the next entry in the catalogue of lies you can use to destroy your life." - John Dolan