Author Topic: CNN Youtube Debate  (Read 5146 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BloodEagle

  • 210
  • Bleeding Paradox!
    • Steam
Is anyone else watching this? Because it's funny as Hell.

:EDIT:

One of them actually managed to jump from a question involving taxes to an answer involving Hitler. Y-e-e-e-e-a-ah.

:EDIT:

From lead paint, to tanks and missiles.  :eek2:
« Last Edit: November 28, 2007, 07:51:33 pm by BloodEagle »

 

Offline Kosh

  • A year behind what's funny
  • 210
Link?
"The reason for this is that the original Fortran got so convoluted and extensive (10's of millions of lines of code) that no-one can actually figure out how it works, there's a massive project going on to decode the original Fortran and write a more modern system, but until then, the UK communication network is actually relying heavily on 35 year old Fortran that nobody understands." - Flipside

Brain I/O error
Replace and press any key

 

Offline BloodEagle

  • 210
  • Bleeding Paradox!
    • Steam
It's on CNN. Maybe it's online as well....

Go to http://www.cnn.com and it's in the upper-right corner.

 

Offline Mefustae

  • 210
  • Chevron locked...
Link?
I think he means a CNN debate about YouTube, rather than a debate about CNN on YouTube.

 

Offline achtung

  • Friendly Neighborhood Mirror Guy
  • 210
  • ****in' Ace
    • Freespacemods.net
BAHAHAHAHAHA

This is great.  Guliani even got booed during the gun rights debate.

This is probably the only time I've heard the words "God", "Jesus", and "Bible" repeated so much I think I'm watching some Christian channel.
FreeSpaceMods.net | FatHax | ??????
In the wise words of Charles de Gaulle, "China is a big country, inhabited by many Chinese."

Formerly known as Swantz

 
Gee who would have guessed that the youtube debate would be a bad idea....

 
Gee who would have guessed that the youtube CNN debate would be a bad idea....

QFT either way...

    |[===---(-         
    ||
 =(||==)_
    ||_____|
 =(||==)
    ||                   
    |[===---(-                             

"Take my love. Take my land. Take me where I cannot stand. I don't care, I'm still free. You can't take the sky from me. Take me out to the black, tell them I ain't comin' back. Burn the land boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me. There's no place I can be since I've found Serenity. But you can't take the sky from me." - Ballad of Serenity

 
 :lol:   @ Yankees vs Red Sox question.
"You need to believe in things that aren't true. How else can they become?" -DEATH, Discworld

 

Offline Kosh

  • A year behind what's funny
  • 210
BAHAHAHAHAHA

This is great.  Guliani even got booed during the gun rights debate.

This is probably the only time I've heard the words "God", "Jesus", and "Bible" repeated so much I think I'm watching some Christian channel.


How anyone can even think about voting for Romney is just amazing, this guy never gives a straight answer about anything. I know all of them are like that to some degree, but he is absolutly the worst. For example, his answer to the waterboarding question: "I will not give a difinate answer about this, when I am president I will get advice from others, blah, blah" He has no opinions about anything.......
"The reason for this is that the original Fortran got so convoluted and extensive (10's of millions of lines of code) that no-one can actually figure out how it works, there's a massive project going on to decode the original Fortran and write a more modern system, but until then, the UK communication network is actually relying heavily on 35 year old Fortran that nobody understands." - Flipside

Brain I/O error
Replace and press any key

  

Offline achtung

  • Friendly Neighborhood Mirror Guy
  • 210
  • ****in' Ace
    • Freespacemods.net
BAHAHAHAHAHA

This is great.  Guliani even got booed during the gun rights debate.

This is probably the only time I've heard the words "God", "Jesus", and "Bible" repeated so much I think I'm watching some Christian channel.


How anyone can even think about voting for Romney is just amazing, this guy never gives a straight answer about anything. I know all of them are like that to some degree, but he is absolutly the worst. For example, his answer to the waterboarding question: "I will not give a difinate answer about this, when I am president I will get advice from others, blah, blah" He has no opinions about anything.......

Isn't that called plausible deniability?
FreeSpaceMods.net | FatHax | ??????
In the wise words of Charles de Gaulle, "China is a big country, inhabited by many Chinese."

Formerly known as Swantz

 
Plausible deniability.....
Here's a question for you: Is Hillary Clinton for or against the War in Iraq?
Answer: That depends on who is asking the question.

Its true though - Romney is a very weak debater.  Way too wishy-washy.  But that's guff that I have will all of the Republican candidates (unless you count Mr. Ron Paul... but um.... he's Ron Paul....).  None of them have the guts to say it like it is.

But then again, alot of those questions are rigged (surprise surprise its CNN)- designed to make the candidate look bad whichever answer they give.  These mass-appeal debates are therefore, for the most part, completely pointless anyways.  Its not about what a candidate wants to do as policy - its about how they can avoid all the laid traps of public speaking.

P.S.  (another huuuuge surprise here.... /sarcasm) Hillary plants question in Republican debate: http://www.townhall.com/blog/g/d91f3cba-6a87-4686-92ce-70a16edc311b
« Last Edit: November 28, 2007, 11:13:04 pm by Hazaanko »

 

Offline Kosh

  • A year behind what's funny
  • 210
Quote
But then again, alot of those questions are rigged (surprise surprise its CNN)- designed to make the candidate look bad whichever answer they give.

Not really, a lot of these questions are about issues that matter to a lot of people (decaying infrastructure being one of them, and Guilliani's answer was sensible). 

On the other hand in the Fox debate, most of the questions were either rediculous, or just generic softball questions. They spent the first 10 minutes talking about who was more conservative, 40 minutes on hillary bashing, and then only 10 minutes talking about actual issues and their proposed solutions.
"The reason for this is that the original Fortran got so convoluted and extensive (10's of millions of lines of code) that no-one can actually figure out how it works, there's a massive project going on to decode the original Fortran and write a more modern system, but until then, the UK communication network is actually relying heavily on 35 year old Fortran that nobody understands." - Flipside

Brain I/O error
Replace and press any key

 
Quote
But then again, alot of those questions are rigged (surprise surprise its CNN)- designed to make the candidate look bad whichever answer they give.

Not really, a lot of these questions are about issues that matter to a lot of people (decaying infrastructure being one of them, and Guilliani's answer was sensible). 

On the other hand in the Fox debate, most of the questions were either rediculous, or just generic softball questions. They spent the first 10 minutes talking about who was more conservative, 40 minutes on hillary bashing, and then only 10 minutes talking about actual issues and their proposed solutions.

Welcome to the world of diversity of opinion.  The exact same and/or worse could be said for the Democrat debates in the "MSM."  ALL generic softball questions.  Oh lets see... what was one of them... oh yeah: "Hillary, what is your favorite type of flower?"

AWESOME... totally awesome.  I'll choose a candidate based upon how they answer questions like that.

Right.... like the non-Fox debates are any better...

 

Offline Mefustae

  • 210
  • Chevron locked...
Right.... like the non-Fox debates are any better...
Not really, but just remember: Fox is Fox. They're inherently at a rung below the others. Most continuous news channels are pretty damn crappy, but Fox just has an extra layer of bull**** smeared all over it.

 

Offline Kosh

  • A year behind what's funny
  • 210
Not really, but just remember: Fox is Fox. They're inherently at a rung below the others. Most continuous news channels are pretty damn crappy, but Fox just has an extra layer of bull**** smeared all over it.

QFT
"The reason for this is that the original Fortran got so convoluted and extensive (10's of millions of lines of code) that no-one can actually figure out how it works, there's a massive project going on to decode the original Fortran and write a more modern system, but until then, the UK communication network is actually relying heavily on 35 year old Fortran that nobody understands." - Flipside

Brain I/O error
Replace and press any key

 

I struggle to find any reason to dislike Ron Paul, he seems to make a lot of sence and seems like a very different kind of politician. He may be on the Republican side but doesnt resemble much about what what I dislike about them as far as I can see. When asked if he would run independantly he said that costs too much money.

 

Offline achtung

  • Friendly Neighborhood Mirror Guy
  • 210
  • ****in' Ace
    • Freespacemods.net

I struggle to find any reason to dislike Ron Paul, he seems to make a lot of sence and seems like a very different kind of politician. He may be on the Republican side but doesnt resemble much about what what I dislike about them as far as I can see. When asked if he would run independantly he said that costs too much money.

Ever heard the phrase "Too good to be true"?
FreeSpaceMods.net | FatHax | ??????
In the wise words of Charles de Gaulle, "China is a big country, inhabited by many Chinese."

Formerly known as Swantz

 
Ever heard the phrase "Too good to be true"?

Yea, but if you're going to vote for someone he seems like the best there. Ive seen videos of him from years ago and he's been saying the same things consistently for years. He seems honest and genuine not something i can say for anyone else there which just seem like slimey politicians. He seems to want to give real answers to questions rather than just dodge them like the rest.

 

Offline achtung

  • Friendly Neighborhood Mirror Guy
  • 210
  • ****in' Ace
    • Freespacemods.net
Ever heard the phrase "Too good to be true"?

Yea, but if you're going to vote for someone he seems like the best there. Ive seen videos of him from years ago and he's been saying the same things consistently for years. He seems honest and genuine not something i can say for anyone else there which just seem like slimey politicians. He seems to want to give real answers to questions rather than just dodge them like the rest.

I promise saying "let the states decide" isn't dodging the issue.   :rolleyes:
FreeSpaceMods.net | FatHax | ??????
In the wise words of Charles de Gaulle, "China is a big country, inhabited by many Chinese."

Formerly known as Swantz

 

Offline DeepSpace9er

  • Bakha bombers rule
  • 28
  • Avoid the beam and you wont get hit
Hell a good amount of those questions were plants by Edwards or Clinton supporters asking questions designed to make the candidates look like buffoons through the typical cliches of what CNN thinks of Republicans in general.