Author Topic: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer  (Read 6492 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
JUST Because of its totally emerged beam cannon. :ick: :ick:

If GTVA could develop a good battle strategy,such as post many small battle groups consist of bomber,fighter and light class cruiser to cover the bomber to take the turret down.Sathanas is only a huge target……

Also because all beam at the forward,Sathanas must always change its shipbow to focus the fire power on the cruiser direction with its poor maneuverability
 :no: :no: :no:

What i want to say is Sathanas is really limited if it facing a mass battle

If the colossus can hold its fire opening in a high rate with a long time, I believe that colossus is able to defeat serval Destoryers at the same time,eg:the SD Ravana,while the Sathanas would be decimated :yes: :yes:
« Last Edit: March 08, 2008, 04:10:35 am by Zalardis »

 

Offline Snail

  • SC 5
  • 214
  • Posts: ☂
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
If you attack it from the back, it will turn around. :P

 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
The Sathanas is a microcosm of the Shivan war machine in a lot of ways. Recall that there is essentially no purpose to a defensive Shivan warship: they have nothing to defend. It is designed to make full use of their main advantages: superior subspace technologies and devestating, rapid-fire beam cannon. The Sathanas is blitzkrieg and manuver warfare on a vast scale. It will not be attacked. It will do the attacking. It cannot be pinned down: its many engine systems and superior subspace drive ensure it will be difficult to stop or keep up with, and its massive firepower ensures that you cannot block its way out for long or trap it in an engagement with another craft.

Yet when all else fails, as it did in A Monster In The Mist, it can have real difficulty dealing with a single inconveniently placed opponent not a twentith of its size.
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

 

Offline Snail

  • SC 5
  • 214
  • Posts: ☂
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
Theoretically, you could destroy a Sath through good tactics or deployment of forces. However, in practice, the Shivans are more than likely going to summon a few Demons or Ravanas to take out your taskforce.


Sathanas jugs may be a bad juggernaut on its own, but in the actual battlefield, filled with hundreds of thousands of Shivan fighters, bombers, and a multitude of support warships, there is no sure way of taking one down.

 
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
Sathanas jugs may be a bad juggernaut on its own, but in the actual battlefield, filled with hundreds of thousands of Shivan fighters, bombers, and a multitude of support warships, there is no sure way of taking one down.

Unless you sneek up on one...
let's say a few wings of stealth fighters armed with Trebuchets to disarm the monster (concentrating on AAA and Flak), and once that's done, a conventional Ursa/Boanerges/Sekhmet raid against the main beams.
As soon as the beams are down, the Phoenicia could hold it back* :p

*I cannot guarantee that the Sath won't launch 250 Nahemas and Seraphims, with endless fighter escort to pwn the Hecate.
'Teeth of the Tiger' - campaign in the making
Story, Ships, Weapons, Project Leader.

 
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
ppor hecate...  :(
Sig nuked! New one coming soon!

 
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
:( Yeah...
(The following is for the Universe, not the game)
I think that some Infyrnos, fired into its fighterbay (Damn, that hole is huge, make it at least 20) could incapacitate it.

Or you could take a risk and fly into it yourself. How far would you get? Think Death Star II :drevil:
The only problem will be the hundreds of fighters on your tail. Maximize your rear shields.

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
And the thousands of Shivans with integral plasma weapons inside.

 

Offline Woolie Wool

  • 211
  • Fire main batteries
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
The weapons used in fighter-to-fighter combat in FS are tac-nuke grade according to FS1. The Shivan equivalent of small arms wouldn't do **** to a fighter.
16:46   Quanto   ****, a mosquito somehow managed to bite the side of my palm
16:46   Quanto   it itches like hell
16:46   Woolie   !8ball does Quanto have malaria
16:46   BotenAnna   Woolie: The outlook is good.
16:47   Quanto   D:

"did they use anesthetic when they removed your sense of humor or did you have to weep and struggle like a tiny baby"
--General Battuta

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
You're probably right. It would, however, be really cool.

 

Offline Snail

  • SC 5
  • 214
  • Posts: ☂
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
The weapons used in fighter-to-fighter combat in FS are tac-nuke grade according to FS1. The Shivan equivalent of small arms wouldn't do **** to a fighter.

Maybe they have nukes inside too. :P

 
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
Maybe they have nukes inside too. :P
Nah... I don't think the innards of the ship would be that strong.

Perhaps someone could try and make a model of the inside of a ship. Start off with a Moloch and go to larger ships as you gain experience.
I would do it myself, but it's probably too complicated for a first try at modelling.

EDIT: Colonol Dekker's title looks like a good place to start gathering inspiration.
« Last Edit: March 08, 2008, 01:37:07 pm by FreeSpaceFreak »

 

Offline Snail

  • SC 5
  • 214
  • Posts: ☂
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
Derek Smart wanted to do that.

 

Offline Colonol Dekker

  • HLP is my mistress
  • 213
  • Aken Tigh Dekker- you've probably heard me
    • My old squad sub-domain
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
?? Huh? I can't see it on this cWap browser. What's it say?
Campaigns I've added my distinctiveness to-
- Blue Planet: Battle Captains
-Battle of Neptune
-Between the Ashes 2
-Blue planet: Age of Aquarius
-FOTG?
-Inferno R1
-Ribos: The aftermath / -Retreat from Deneb
-Sol: A History
-TBP EACW teaser
-Earth Brakiri war
-TBP Fortune Hunters (I think?)
-TBP Relic
-Trancsend (Possibly?)
-Uncharted Territory
-Vassagos Dirge
-War Machine
(Others lost to the mists of time and no discernible audit trail)

Your friendly Orestes tactical controller.

Secret bomb God.
That one time I got permabanned and got to read who was being bitxhy about me :p....
GO GO DEKKER RANGERSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
President of the Scooby Doo Model Appreciation Society
The only good Zod is a dead Zod
NEWGROUNDS COMEDY GOLD, UPDATED DAILY
http://badges.steamprofile.com/profile/default/steam/76561198011784807.png

 

Offline Polpolion

  • The sizzle, it thinks!
  • 211
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
I'm willing to bet that the Sathi has 5 times the fighter compliment that the collosus does, and if GTVA command was smart enough to send a massive bomber wave at the sath, then the shivans would be smart enough to sortie an intercept flight of say... 200 dragons.
« Last Edit: March 08, 2008, 05:08:17 pm by thesizzler »

 

Offline blowfish

  • 211
  • Join the cult of KILL MY ROUTER!!!!!!!!!!1
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
I'm willing to bet that the Sathi has 5 times the fighter compliment that the collosus does, and if GTVA command was smart enough to send a massive bomber wave at the sath, then the shivans would be smart enough to sortie an intercept flight of say... 200 dragans.

You'd think the Shivans could have come up with some more fighters in Bearbaiting.

 

Offline Polpolion

  • The sizzle, it thinks!
  • 211
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
I'm willing to bet that the Sathi has 5 times the fighter compliment that the collosus does, and if GTVA command was smart enough to send a massive bomber wave at the sath, then the shivans would be smart enough to sortie an intercept flight of say... 200 dragans.

You'd think the Shivans could have come up with some more fighters in Bearbaiting.

You'd also think the GTVA could've came up with more ships to escort their 20 year, several billion dollar, 30000 people investment, aka the Colossus.

 

Offline Jeff Vader

  • The Back of the Hero!
  • 212
  • Bwahaha
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
I'm willing to bet that the Sathi has 5 times the fighter compliment that the collosus does, and if GTVA command was smart enough to send a massive bomber wave at the sath, then the shivans would be smart enough to sortie an intercept flight of say... 200 dragans.

You'd think the Shivans could have come up with some more fighters in Bearbaiting.

You'd also think the GTVA could've came up with more ships to escort their 20 year, several billion dollar, 30000 people investment.
Or someone really trusts Alpha 1.
23:40 < achillion > EveningTea: ass
23:40 < achillion > wait no
23:40 < achillion > evilbagel: ass
23:40 < EveningTea > ?
23:40 < achillion > 2-letter tab complete failure

14:08 < achillion > there's too much talk of butts and dongs in here
14:08 < achillion > the level of discourse has really plummeted
14:08 < achillion > Let's talk about politics instead
14:08 <@The_E > butts and dongs are part of #hard-light's brand now
14:08 <@The_E > well
14:08 <@The_E > EvilBagel's brand, at least

01:06 < T-Rog > welp
01:07 < T-Rog > I've got to take some very strong antibiotics
01:07 < achillion > penis infection?
01:08 < T-Rog > Chlamydia
01:08 < achillion > O.o
01:09 < achillion > well
01:09 < achillion > I guess that happens
01:09 < T-Rog > at least it's curable
01:09 < achillion > yeah
01:10 < T-Rog > I take it you weren't actually expecting it to be a penis infection
01:10 < achillion > I was not

14:04 < achillion > Sometimes the way to simplify is to just have a habit and not think about it too much
14:05 < achillion > until stuff explodes
14:05 < achillion > then you start thinking about it

22:16 < T-Rog > I don't know how my gf would feel about Jewish conspiracy porn

15:41 <-INFO > EveningTea [[email protected]] has joined #hard-light
15:47 < EvilBagel> butt
15:51 < Achillion> yes
15:53 <-INFO > EveningTea [[email protected]] has quit [Quit: http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client]

18:53 < Achillion> Dicks are fun

21:41 < MatthTheGeek> you can't spell assassin without two asses

20:05 < sigtau> i'm mining titcoins from now on

00:31 < oldlaptop> Drunken antisocial educated freezing hicks with good Internet == Finland stereotype

11:46 <-INFO > Kobrar [[email protected]] has joined #hard-light
11:50 < achtung> Surely you've heard of DVDA
11:50 < achtung> Double Vaginal Double ANal
11:51 < Kobrar> ...
11:51 <-INFO > Kobrar [[email protected]] has left #hard-light []

 

Offline Polpolion

  • The sizzle, it thinks!
  • 211
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
I'm willing to bet that the Sathi has 5 times the fighter compliment that the collosus does, and if GTVA command was smart enough to send a massive bomber wave at the sath, then the shivans would be smart enough to sortie an intercept flight of say... 200 dragans.

You'd think the Shivans could have come up with some more fighters in Bearbaiting.

You'd also think the GTVA could've came up with more ships to escort their 20 year, several billion dollar, 30000 people investment.
Or someone really trusts Alpha 1.

Which is why neither the GTVA nor Shivans are smart enough to deploy escorts proportionate to a ship's importance.

 

Offline Kie99

  • 211
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
That's down to game engine limitations.
"You shot me in the bollocks, Tim"
"Like I said, no hard feelings"